Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m being serious. He’s always seemed so lovely. (And I can’t vote in a GA race so who cares.). But many NFL players have shady pasts so I was wondering whether he had anything obviously wrong.
He comes across as mentally challenged..
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m being serious. He’s always seemed so lovely. (And I can’t vote in a GA race so who cares.). But many NFL players have shady pasts so I was wondering whether he had anything obviously wrong.
He comes across as mentally challenged..
Well, he's not--unless you have a bias against NFL players.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m being serious. He’s always seemed so lovely. (And I can’t vote in a GA race so who cares.). But many NFL players have shady pasts so I was wondering whether he had anything obviously wrong.
He comes across as mentally challenged..
Anonymous wrote:I’m being serious. He’s always seemed so lovely. (And I can’t vote in a GA race so who cares.). But many NFL players have shady pasts so I was wondering whether he had anything obviously wrong.
Anonymous wrote:He's also a political novice. I'd prefer someone with more government experience.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A question about Herschel Walker... If he gets elected, how exactly does that work? I mean, given he has multiple personality disorder...
https://www.startribune.com/herschel-walker-reveals-he-suffers-from-multiple-personality-disorder/16686526/
When he is voting on a bill, how would we know it's the Herschel Walker personality who was elected and not some other personality casting the vote? After all, if it's a different personality, wouldn't that actually be a vote being cast by some other random person other than Herschel Walker, who wasn't elected?
This is a shitty question, especially considering how progressives and liberals push hard to destigmatize mental illness. I guess it’s all right to stigmatize mental illness and being open about conditions when the person is Republican?
+1 This question was especially insensitive due to the way it was worded and the demeaning, sarcastic intent behind it. Disgusting.
You do realize that we are talking about Multiple Personality Disorder not depression? That PP was not being sarcastic. That is how MPD works. Each alter is a separate persona that acts independently of the other personas.
MPD is and always has been a dubious diagnosis. Many psychiatrists believe it doesn’t even exist. Regardless, the idea that a person who seeks treatment for MPD should be forever barred from participating in politics is hateful and cruel.
But if they use it as an excuse for why they can’t be held responsible for beating their spouse should most definitely bar someone from participating in politics.
This is a stupid line of thinking. The domestic violence, not the alleged diagnosis, is the problem here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A question about Herschel Walker... If he gets elected, how exactly does that work? I mean, given he has multiple personality disorder...
https://www.startribune.com/herschel-walker-reveals-he-suffers-from-multiple-personality-disorder/16686526/
When he is voting on a bill, how would we know it's the Herschel Walker personality who was elected and not some other personality casting the vote? After all, if it's a different personality, wouldn't that actually be a vote being cast by some other random person other than Herschel Walker, who wasn't elected?
This is a shitty question, especially considering how progressives and liberals push hard to destigmatize mental illness. I guess it’s all right to stigmatize mental illness and being open about conditions when the person is Republican?
+1 This question was especially insensitive due to the way it was worded and the demeaning, sarcastic intent behind it. Disgusting.
You do realize that we are talking about Multiple Personality Disorder not depression? That PP was not being sarcastic. That is how MPD works. Each alter is a separate persona that acts independently of the other personas.
MPD is and always has been a dubious diagnosis. Many psychiatrists believe it doesn’t even exist. Regardless, the idea that a person who seeks treatment for MPD should be forever barred from participating in politics is hateful and cruel.
But if they use it as an excuse for why they can’t be held responsible for beating their spouse should most definitely bar someone from participating in politics.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A question about Herschel Walker... If he gets elected, how exactly does that work? I mean, given he has multiple personality disorder...
https://www.startribune.com/herschel-walker-reveals-he-suffers-from-multiple-personality-disorder/16686526/
When he is voting on a bill, how would we know it's the Herschel Walker personality who was elected and not some other personality casting the vote? After all, if it's a different personality, wouldn't that actually be a vote being cast by some other random person other than Herschel Walker, who wasn't elected?
This is a shitty question, especially considering how progressives and liberals push hard to destigmatize mental illness. I guess it’s all right to stigmatize mental illness and being open about conditions when the person is Republican?
+1 This question was especially insensitive due to the way it was worded and the demeaning, sarcastic intent behind it. Disgusting.
You do realize that we are talking about Multiple Personality Disorder not depression? That PP was not being sarcastic. That is how MPD works. Each alter is a separate persona that acts independently of the other personas.
MPD is and always has been a dubious diagnosis. Many psychiatrists believe it doesn’t even exist. Regardless, the idea that a person who seeks treatment for MPD should be forever barred from participating in politics is hateful and cruel.
But if they use it as an excuse for why they can’t be held responsible for beating their spouse should most definitely bar someone from participating in politics.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A question about Herschel Walker... If he gets elected, how exactly does that work? I mean, given he has multiple personality disorder...
https://www.startribune.com/herschel-walker-reveals-he-suffers-from-multiple-personality-disorder/16686526/
When he is voting on a bill, how would we know it's the Herschel Walker personality who was elected and not some other personality casting the vote? After all, if it's a different personality, wouldn't that actually be a vote being cast by some other random person other than Herschel Walker, who wasn't elected?
This is a shitty question, especially considering how progressives and liberals push hard to destigmatize mental illness. I guess it’s all right to stigmatize mental illness and being open about conditions when the person is Republican?
+1 This question was especially insensitive due to the way it was worded and the demeaning, sarcastic intent behind it. Disgusting.
You do realize that we are talking about Multiple Personality Disorder not depression? That PP was not being sarcastic. That is how MPD works. Each alter is a separate persona that acts independently of the other personas.
MPD is and always has been a dubious diagnosis. Many psychiatrists believe it doesn’t even exist. Regardless, the idea that a person who seeks treatment for MPD should be forever barred from participating in politics is hateful and cruel.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A question about Herschel Walker... If he gets elected, how exactly does that work? I mean, given he has multiple personality disorder...
https://www.startribune.com/herschel-walker-reveals-he-suffers-from-multiple-personality-disorder/16686526/
When he is voting on a bill, how would we know it's the Herschel Walker personality who was elected and not some other personality casting the vote? After all, if it's a different personality, wouldn't that actually be a vote being cast by some other random person other than Herschel Walker, who wasn't elected?
This is a shitty question, especially considering how progressives and liberals push hard to destigmatize mental illness. I guess it’s all right to stigmatize mental illness and being open about conditions when the person is Republican?
+1 This question was especially insensitive due to the way it was worded and the demeaning, sarcastic intent behind it. Disgusting.
You do realize that we are talking about Multiple Personality Disorder not depression? That PP was not being sarcastic. That is how MPD works. Each alter is a separate persona that acts independently of the other personas.
MPD is and always has been a dubious diagnosis. Many psychiatrists believe it doesn’t even exist. Regardless, the idea that a person who seeks treatment for MPD should be forever barred from participating in politics is hateful and cruel.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A question about Herschel Walker... If he gets elected, how exactly does that work? I mean, given he has multiple personality disorder...
https://www.startribune.com/herschel-walker-reveals-he-suffers-from-multiple-personality-disorder/16686526/
When he is voting on a bill, how would we know it's the Herschel Walker personality who was elected and not some other personality casting the vote? After all, if it's a different personality, wouldn't that actually be a vote being cast by some other random person other than Herschel Walker, who wasn't elected?
This is a shitty question, especially considering how progressives and liberals push hard to destigmatize mental illness. I guess it’s all right to stigmatize mental illness and being open about conditions when the person is Republican?
+1 This question was especially insensitive due to the way it was worded and the demeaning, sarcastic intent behind it. Disgusting.
You do realize that we are talking about Multiple Personality Disorder not depression? That PP was not being sarcastic. That is how MPD works. Each alter is a separate persona that acts independently of the other personas.
MPD is and always has been a dubious diagnosis. Many psychiatrists believe it doesn’t even exist. Regardless, the idea that a person who seeks treatment for MPD should be forever barred from participating in politics is hateful and cruel.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A question about Herschel Walker... If he gets elected, how exactly does that work? I mean, given he has multiple personality disorder...
https://www.startribune.com/herschel-walker-reveals-he-suffers-from-multiple-personality-disorder/16686526/
When he is voting on a bill, how would we know it's the Herschel Walker personality who was elected and not some other personality casting the vote? After all, if it's a different personality, wouldn't that actually be a vote being cast by some other random person other than Herschel Walker, who wasn't elected?
This is a shitty question, especially considering how progressives and liberals push hard to destigmatize mental illness. I guess it’s all right to stigmatize mental illness and being open about conditions when the person is Republican?
+1 This question was especially insensitive due to the way it was worded and the demeaning, sarcastic intent behind it. Disgusting.
You do realize that we are talking about Multiple Personality Disorder not depression? That PP was not being sarcastic. That is how MPD works. Each alter is a separate persona that acts independently of the other personas.