Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Would you be happy if it were a “promise” ring instead of an “engagement” ring? Since the timeline is so distressing to you? It’s obviously not distressing your brother. If it does, that’s for him to discuss with her.
It is distressing him, according to my mother. And I believe her. She was concerned when he called her and told her they couldn’t marry in May, the date his fiancé had set, unexpectedly. He said that, and said it was due to “a lot of problems” according to mom, who has liked every one of his romantic partners. I don’t want to stress him, but I don’t want my mom to be stressed over this total bullshit. This woman hasn’t been straight that she requires a very long engagement in order to retain housing and school arrangements. She’s encouraging her daughter to call my mom (have met twice) “grandma” and has dropped suggestions that she wants to get pregnant - when she can’t cohabitate with my brother. It’s all manipulative, and all the snark in the world here doesn’t change that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And the reason I’m venting here is because it’s safe and anon enough, and because while of course she should design her own life, I’ve never met anyone like her, who would seemingly gladly ask a partner to accomplish things that she must know can’t be done without some form or fraud (eg, the tuition - if they marry of course the aid would changed).
I’m confused by you, OP. If as you say she has no intention of marrying soon - which you’re angry about because she has a “precious” ring and your brother isn’t allowed to give her a ring unless marriage is imminent I guess - then the child’s FA will not be affected.
I think your brother knows exactly what the timeline is, and just hasn’t shared it with you because you’re judgmental as hell and he doesn’t want to deal with it.
She didn’t tell him. That I know. For the rest, GFY.
Now you show your true colors.
Anonymous wrote:Would you be happy if it were a “promise” ring instead of an “engagement” ring? Since the timeline is so distressing to you? It’s obviously not distressing your brother. If it does, that’s for him to discuss with her.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And the reason I’m venting here is because it’s safe and anon enough, and because while of course she should design her own life, I’ve never met anyone like her, who would seemingly gladly ask a partner to accomplish things that she must know can’t be done without some form or fraud (eg, the tuition - if they marry of course the aid would changed).
I’m confused by you, OP. If as you say she has no intention of marrying soon - which you’re angry about because she has a “precious” ring and your brother isn’t allowed to give her a ring unless marriage is imminent I guess - then the child’s FA will not be affected.
I think your brother knows exactly what the timeline is, and just hasn’t shared it with you because you’re judgmental as hell and he doesn’t want to deal with it.
She didn’t tell him. That I know. For the rest, GFY.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And the reason I’m venting here is because it’s safe and anon enough, and because while of course she should design her own life, I’ve never met anyone like her, who would seemingly gladly ask a partner to accomplish things that she must know can’t be done without some form or fraud (eg, the tuition - if they marry of course the aid would changed).
I’m confused by you, OP. If as you say she has no intention of marrying soon - which you’re angry about because she has a “precious” ring and your brother isn’t allowed to give her a ring unless marriage is imminent I guess - then the child’s FA will not be affected.
I think your brother knows exactly what the timeline is, and just hasn’t shared it with you because you’re judgmental as hell and he doesn’t want to deal with it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And the reason I’m venting here is because it’s safe and anon enough, and because while of course she should design her own life, I’ve never met anyone like her, who would seemingly gladly ask a partner to accomplish things that she must know can’t be done without some form or fraud (eg, the tuition - if they marry of course the aid would changed).
I’m confused by you, OP. If as you say she has no intention of marrying soon - which you’re angry about because she has a “precious” ring and your brother isn’t allowed to give her a ring unless marriage is imminent I guess - then the child’s FA will not be affected.
I think your brother knows exactly what the timeline is, and just hasn’t shared it with you because you’re judgmental as hell and he doesn’t want to deal with it.
Anonymous wrote:Is your potential SIL ... the NYC serial grifter?? https://www.thecut.com/article/kate-gladstone-roommate-west-village-nyc.html
The grifter has a daughter that age.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, you are missing some core facts. A 16 year lease on an apartment isn’t a thing.
I think I caught that they are in NYC. In NYC, rent-controlled apartments are frequently passed down from parents to children. Keeping it isn’t crazy at all. Maybe OP doesn’t understand this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You PPs are totally and completely insane. The circumstances are as I put them. She’s a user and a liar; I know the rule is to pile on OP, but that changes nothing.
I think what you’re not getting is that NONE of the circumstances that are apparently so triggering to you amount to anything. That is why people think you sound insane. So far we have:
- goes grocery shopping a lot and wants certain brands
- lets 11 year old child stay up late
- never married child’s father; complains about father
- takes ubers
- lets daughter have bedroom in rent controlled apartment
- gets daughter financial aid for private school
- does not want to lose rent controlled apartment
You forgot accepts engagement ring while making it impossible to marry because she can’t afford to live in an apartment with her husband. This is not normal, dear. People who want love and peace in their lives aren’t having one party not plan to cohabitate while accepting a ring.
Anonymous wrote:And the reason I’m venting here is because it’s safe and anon enough, and because while of course she should design her own life, I’ve never met anyone like her, who would seemingly gladly ask a partner to accomplish things that she must know can’t be done without some form or fraud (eg, the tuition - if they marry of course the aid would changed).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, you are missing some core facts. A 16 year lease on an apartment isn’t a thing.
I think I caught that they are in NYC. In NYC, rent-controlled apartments are frequently passed down from parents to children. Keeping it isn’t crazy at all. Maybe OP doesn’t understand this.
If this is the case, OP and her family are really off-base criticizing the SIL. Preserving that kind of deal plus private tuition is really important. They can get married when the kid graduates. In the meantime, it makes ZERO sense to get married soon. SIL would be crazy to do so. Absolutely crazy.