Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“ Parent to a recent Northwestern grad here, and yes, that's certainly one of the key selling points of the university, and something Gwynne Shotwell talked about in her commencement speech last week: She knew she wanted to be an engineer but didn't want to be surrounded by other engineers her entire time in college. If you're a high-performing student interested in any of Northwestern's "spiked" fields that it's really good at (engineering, certain humanities/STEM fields, theater, journalism, film, music) but also know you don't want to be at just an engineering school or a conservatory or what-have-you, Northwestern's the place. I don't think there's another school in the country that does that as well as NU does.”
Michigan does it with most of the above majors and some not listed; like fine arts, architecture, and a dedicated undergraduate business school among many others.
DP and I say this with all the respect to Michigan, but I think there's a notable difference in size, intimacy, and avg. student caliber between those two schools.
Really? There is a difference in size and intimacy? Gee, who would have thought that? The average student difference is not that great, especially in STEM fields. It was mentioned that NU does “other” things better than any other school in the country. My point was Michigan does that as well, except it has an even greater breadth and depth than NU or almost all privates can offer. There really is no other university in the country that combines so many areas of academic excellence.
Berkeley and UCLA instantly come to mind.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“ Parent to a recent Northwestern grad here, and yes, that's certainly one of the key selling points of the university, and something Gwynne Shotwell talked about in her commencement speech last week: She knew she wanted to be an engineer but didn't want to be surrounded by other engineers her entire time in college. If you're a high-performing student interested in any of Northwestern's "spiked" fields that it's really good at (engineering, certain humanities/STEM fields, theater, journalism, film, music) but also know you don't want to be at just an engineering school or a conservatory or what-have-you, Northwestern's the place. I don't think there's another school in the country that does that as well as NU does.”
Michigan does it with most of the above majors and some not listed; like fine arts, architecture, and a dedicated undergraduate business school among many others.
DP and I say this with all the respect to Michigan, but I think there's a notable difference in size, intimacy, and avg. student caliber between those two schools.
Really? There is a difference in size and intimacy? Gee, who would have thought that? The average student difference is not that great, especially in STEM fields. It was mentioned that NU does “other” things better than any other school in the country. My point was Michigan does that as well, except it has an even greater breadth and depth than NU or almost all privates can offer. There really is no other university in the country that combines so many areas of academic excellence.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“ Parent to a recent Northwestern grad here, and yes, that's certainly one of the key selling points of the university, and something Gwynne Shotwell talked about in her commencement speech last week: She knew she wanted to be an engineer but didn't want to be surrounded by other engineers her entire time in college. If you're a high-performing student interested in any of Northwestern's "spiked" fields that it's really good at (engineering, certain humanities/STEM fields, theater, journalism, film, music) but also know you don't want to be at just an engineering school or a conservatory or what-have-you, Northwestern's the place. I don't think there's another school in the country that does that as well as NU does.”
Michigan does it with most of the above majors and some not listed; like fine arts, architecture, and a dedicated undergraduate business school among many others.
DP and I say this with all the respect to Michigan, but I think there's a notable difference in size, intimacy, and avg. student caliber between those two schools.
Anonymous wrote:“ Parent to a recent Northwestern grad here, and yes, that's certainly one of the key selling points of the university, and something Gwynne Shotwell talked about in her commencement speech last week: She knew she wanted to be an engineer but didn't want to be surrounded by other engineers her entire time in college. If you're a high-performing student interested in any of Northwestern's "spiked" fields that it's really good at (engineering, certain humanities/STEM fields, theater, journalism, film, music) but also know you don't want to be at just an engineering school or a conservatory or what-have-you, Northwestern's the place. I don't think there's another school in the country that does that as well as NU does.”
Michigan does it with most of the above majors and some not listed; like fine arts, architecture, and a dedicated undergraduate business school among many others.
Anonymous wrote:I went to NU and had a really good time there. If you like to dabble on other activities it's a good school to do stuff like music and theater while taking a variety of classes. Plus the football games are free to all students. Evanston can be a little bubble but you can also get into Chicago easily. I did a STEM degree and having a break by doing music helped keep me from stressing myself out all the time.
However, the price has more than doubled since I graduated 10ish years ago. They were by far the most generous with financial aid than other schools I got into at the time, so there's that. I got a pretty generous grant from them when no one else offered anything. But it's just crazy how much the cost has gone up in such a short time.
Anonymous wrote:The Most Popular Colleges at the Top 50 Prep Schools in the U.S.
Anonymous wrote:This is the 5th time this week that this list has been posted (4 separate threads as well as this comment on an existing thread). It was ambiguous at first (could have been a not very bright UChicago booster posting), but at this point it seems more likely that it’s being done by the UChicago basher(s?) who want to keep bumping these threads up and enabling the slugfest to go another round. Regardless, its tiresome; can we stop?
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/981088.page
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/981089.page
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/981312.page
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/quote/135/20251283.page
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/981685.page
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UChicago as an institution has many achievements (and the marketing department to boot) but is grossly overhyped generally, and its alumni tend to be terribly insecure about their place in the world. I've had good experiences with Northwestern alumni.
They were just being polite.
Pardon? You think trolling anonymous internet boards aggressively touting the school and spamming DCUM with ranking lists that favor UCHicago is "being polite"? You think loudly proclaiming that "UChicago is the new Harvard" and insulting anyone who might disagree with you is polite behavior?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UChicago as an institution has many achievements (and the marketing department to boot) but is grossly overhyped generally, and its alumni tend to be terribly insecure about their place in the world. I've had good experiences with Northwestern alumni.
They were just being polite.
Pardon? You think trolling anonymous internet boards aggressively touting the school and spamming DCUM with ranking lists that favor UCHicago is "being polite"? You think loudly proclaiming that "UChicago is the new Harvard" and insulting anyone who might disagree with you is polite behavior?