Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The comments were horrible, Chrissy sucks and her actions and language are indefensible, but can Courtney Stodden just go away? I hate when people bring up stuff that happened 10+ years ago just because they want to be back in the news again. It's just a waste of everyone's time.

Agree.

Courtney was a very troubled, exploited teenager then and didn't have the ability to bring it up back then. Now Chrissy is complaining about being attacked on the internet and it's obviously going to piss off Courtney.

Objection overruled.

Courtney wants to be famous. She has always wanted to be famous. What’s the best and easiest way to get in name in the media. By harping on something that happened 10 yrs ago but someone who is now famous.

Truth.

Chrissy was already famous 10 years ago.

She really wasn’t. She wasn’t nowhere as popular as she is now.

Why is this relevant at all? Chrissy is the mother to a daughter now, maybe she can finally see how gross her past behavior was. Courtney is the victim and her timing and motives don't matter given how horribly she was treated.

It’s relevant bc Courtney has been trying to get her name out there for years. Actually, I just looked Courtney up again and the pronouns are they/them. They have wanted to be famous and in the media. So They has been trying to get Chrissy canceled so they can have the media circulating. They motives are quite clear.

Good. Then it couldn't happen to a trashier person. She's doing everyone a favor by exposing how disgusting Chrissy is.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone keeps asking why CT went after people.
Because she was insecure and drunk and spent her time in an industry that is mean and superficial.

But this is true of tons of people who don’t encourage others to take their lives.

Actually Twitter was a dumpster fire. People keep getting canceled for their past tweets.

I’ve been on Twitter since it first became popular. I don’t recall ever seeing many tweets encouraging others to kill themselves. And the nastiest tweets are almost always from anonymous randos. This has never been normal or acceptable behavior even on Twitter.

I think Teigan felt empowered to be nasty because she was young and beautiful and starting to get positive attention in the industry, and she had probably observed that being “the hot girl” often affords some women a lot of leeway in their behavior. I sometimes wonder if women who do stuff like this are testing their powers. Like if you can tell some child on Twitter to kill herself and no one says anything, that’s how you know you’re really pretty and popular.

I remember this dynamic from when I was younger. Sometimes the pretty, mean girls would get this gleam in their eye, like “I wonder if anyone is going to call me on this because I know I’m being terrible!” And then if no one did, or even better, if someone called them out and people rushed to her defense: triumph.

It is a really, really upsetting dynamic and as someone who has been bullied in a similar way, it feels absolutely devastating. Because it’s not just whatever the mean girl is saying about you. It’s all the people standing around agreeing, or at least not intervening. It’s essentially being shamed and shunned and you feel completely powerless and it can absolutely make you contemplate suicide. I started self-harming when it happened to me.

It’s really harmful behavior. Teigan should hold herself accountable, especially knowing what she knows now about mental health (and having experienced online bullying herself).

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:*laughs in Alison Roman*

As she should. I was disappointed and offended by Roman’s comments. She paid a high price for those comments and essentially torpedoed her career. I felt badly for Teigen at the time, a producer of Roman’s show. Teigen seemed genuinely stung and understandably so. But what a hypocrite, wow. History of bullying and harassing women. No, thank you.

roman’s comments were totally overblown - cancel culture at its worst. but in teigen’s defense, she actually didn’t join the cancellation attempts. but anyway last laugh is on tiegen because her recipes suck, but alison roman’s are genuinely really good. roman’s cancellation was part of a broader wave of cancellations within the food media world and of course hers was more bitter and vicious because it’s always easier to go after a young, successful liberal white woman for saying something wrong than it is to address actual issues. her cancellation was about social media mobs and jealousy.

Absolutely not. Her food is bland and boring like her.

All of the recipes of hers I’ve made have been really good. I cook and read recipes a lot so I know what I’m talking about. But thanks for confirming that this is about attacking her personally and not about the bona fides of the situation. Alison Roman losing her job because of some snarky musings vs Teigan’s vicious harassment of a vulnerable teen are completely different scales.

Let's not get into Alison Roman. As an Indian woman, I find her appropriation of ethnic food into random "stews" pretty gross (and the recipes suck, too)

anyone can make a chickpea stew. basic ingredients aren’t “appropriation” - if that were true we couldn’t use tomatoes, potatoes, or black pepper in the US. but yeah sure, Alison Roman publishing a stew recipe with garbanzo beans and coconut milk is totally the same as online bullying of teenage girl and telling her to kill herself.

I wasn't comparing the two!!!

ok well I look forward to your movement to cancel every restaurant in the US with potatoes or tomatoes on the menu.

and you better cancel all the Indian dishes with potatoes too ...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:*laughs in Alison Roman*

As she should. I was disappointed and offended by Roman’s comments. She paid a high price for those comments and essentially torpedoed her career. I felt badly for Teigen at the time, a producer of Roman’s show. Teigen seemed genuinely stung and understandably so. But what a hypocrite, wow. History of bullying and harassing women. No, thank you.

roman’s comments were totally overblown - cancel culture at its worst. but in teigen’s defense, she actually didn’t join the cancellation attempts. but anyway last laugh is on tiegen because her recipes suck, but alison roman’s are genuinely really good. roman’s cancellation was part of a broader wave of cancellations within the food media world and of course hers was more bitter and vicious because it’s always easier to go after a young, successful liberal white woman for saying something wrong than it is to address actual issues. her cancellation was about social media mobs and jealousy.

Absolutely not. Her food is bland and boring like her.

All of the recipes of hers I’ve made have been really good. I cook and read recipes a lot so I know what I’m talking about. But thanks for confirming that this is about attacking her personally and not about the bona fides of the situation. Alison Roman losing her job because of some snarky musings vs Teigan’s vicious harassment of a vulnerable teen are completely different scales.

Let's not get into Alison Roman. As an Indian woman, I find her appropriation of ethnic food into random "stews" pretty gross (and the recipes suck, too)

anyone can make a chickpea stew. basic ingredients aren’t “appropriation” - if that were true we couldn’t use tomatoes, potatoes, or black pepper in the US. but yeah sure, Alison Roman publishing a stew recipe with garbanzo beans and coconut milk is totally the same as online bullying of teenage girl and telling her to kill herself.

I wasn't comparing the two!!!

ok well I look forward to your movement to cancel every restaurant in the US with potatoes or tomatoes on the menu.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:*laughs in Alison Roman*

As she should. I was disappointed and offended by Roman’s comments. She paid a high price for those comments and essentially torpedoed her career. I felt badly for Teigen at the time, a producer of Roman’s show. Teigen seemed genuinely stung and understandably so. But what a hypocrite, wow. History of bullying and harassing women. No, thank you.

roman’s comments were totally overblown - cancel culture at its worst. but in teigen’s defense, she actually didn’t join the cancellation attempts. but anyway last laugh is on tiegen because her recipes suck, but alison roman’s are genuinely really good. roman’s cancellation was part of a broader wave of cancellations within the food media world and of course hers was more bitter and vicious because it’s always easier to go after a young, successful liberal white woman for saying something wrong than it is to address actual issues. her cancellation was about social media mobs and jealousy.

Absolutely not. Her food is bland and boring like her.

All of the recipes of hers I’ve made have been really good. I cook and read recipes a lot so I know what I’m talking about. But thanks for confirming that this is about attacking her personally and not about the bona fides of the situation. Alison Roman losing her job because of some snarky musings vs Teigan’s vicious harassment of a vulnerable teen are completely different scales.

Let's not get into Alison Roman. As an Indian woman, I find her appropriation of ethnic food into random "stews" pretty gross (and the recipes suck, too)

anyone can make a chickpea stew. basic ingredients aren’t “appropriation” - if that were true we couldn’t use tomatoes, potatoes, or black pepper in the US. but yeah sure, Alison Roman publishing a stew recipe with garbanzo beans and coconut milk is totally the same as online bullying of teenage girl and telling her to kill herself.

and btw, the stew has like 16,000 5-star reviews on the NYTimes websites. She’s a good recipe writer. That’s in fact why people attack her, because social media hates successful young women or young women who attract attention at all.

Bland people like bland food. Is this a foreign concept to you?

Plenty of successful young women. She wasn’t original or interesting.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The comments were horrible, Chrissy sucks and her actions and language are indefensible, but can Courtney Stodden just go away? I hate when people bring up stuff that happened 10+ years ago just because they want to be back in the news again. It's just a waste of everyone's time.

Agree.

Courtney was a very troubled, exploited teenager then and didn't have the ability to bring it up back then. Now Chrissy is complaining about being attacked on the internet and it's obviously going to piss off Courtney.

Objection overruled.

I remember when Courtney was all over the media and people were pretty ruthless. She was on Jezebel quite a lot and I just did a search and saw she was talking about bullying back then, including someone telling her to kill herself, it may have been Chrissy, though I wouldn't be surprised if there were others.
https://jezebel.com/courtney-stodden-is-worlds-weirdest-anti-bullying-advoc-5865051

There were definitely others. However, randos won’t give her the boost in the media she wants.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The comments were horrible, Chrissy sucks and her actions and language are indefensible, but can Courtney Stodden just go away? I hate when people bring up stuff that happened 10+ years ago just because they want to be back in the news again. It's just a waste of everyone's time.

Agree.

Courtney was a very troubled, exploited teenager then and didn't have the ability to bring it up back then. Now Chrissy is complaining about being attacked on the internet and it's obviously going to piss off Courtney.

Objection overruled.

Yeah, no. Agree that Courtney needs to be cancelled too. All of them.

+1

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The comments were horrible, Chrissy sucks and her actions and language are indefensible, but can Courtney Stodden just go away? I hate when people bring up stuff that happened 10+ years ago just because they want to be back in the news again. It's just a waste of everyone's time.

Agree.

Courtney was a very troubled, exploited teenager then and didn't have the ability to bring it up back then. Now Chrissy is complaining about being attacked on the internet and it's obviously going to piss off Courtney.

Objection overruled.

I remember when Courtney was all over the media and people were pretty ruthless. She was on Jezebel quite a lot and I just did a search and saw she was talking about bullying back then, including someone telling her to kill herself, it may have been Chrissy, though I wouldn't be surprised if there were others.
https://jezebel.com/courtney-stodden-is-worlds-weirdest-anti-bullying-advoc-5865051

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The comments were horrible, Chrissy sucks and her actions and language are indefensible, but can Courtney Stodden just go away? I hate when people bring up stuff that happened 10+ years ago just because they want to be back in the news again. It's just a waste of everyone's time.

Agree.

Courtney was a very troubled, exploited teenager then and didn't have the ability to bring it up back then. Now Chrissy is complaining about being attacked on the internet and it's obviously going to piss off Courtney.

Objection overruled.

Courtney wants to be famous. She has always wanted to be famous. What’s the best and easiest way to get in name in the media. By harping on something that happened 10 yrs ago but someone who is now famous.

Truth.

Chrissy was already famous 10 years ago.

She really wasn’t. She wasn’t nowhere as popular as she is now.

Why is this relevant at all? Chrissy is the mother to a daughter now, maybe she can finally see how gross her past behavior was. Courtney is the victim and her timing and motives don't matter given how horribly she was treated.

It’s relevant bc Courtney has been trying to get her name out there for years. Actually, I just looked Courtney up again and the pronouns are they/them. They have wanted to be famous and in the media. So They has been trying to get Chrissy canceled so they can have the media circulating. They motives are quite clear.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone keeps asking why CT went after people.
Because she was insecure and drunk and spent her time in an industry that is mean and superficial.

But this is true of tons of people who don’t encourage others to take their lives.

Actually Twitter was a dumpster fire. People keep getting canceled for their past tweets.

I’ve been on Twitter since it first became popular. I don’t recall ever seeing many tweets encouraging others to kill themselves. And the nastiest tweets are almost always from anonymous randos. This has never been normal or acceptable behavior even on Twitter.

Then you weren’t following anyone or actually active. Twitter was a known dumpster fire from the beginning. The difference was no one was doing searches for old tweets.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:*laughs in Alison Roman*

As she should. I was disappointed and offended by Roman’s comments. She paid a high price for those comments and essentially torpedoed her career. I felt badly for Teigen at the time, a producer of Roman’s show. Teigen seemed genuinely stung and understandably so. But what a hypocrite, wow. History of bullying and harassing women. No, thank you.

roman’s comments were totally overblown - cancel culture at its worst. but in teigen’s defense, she actually didn’t join the cancellation attempts. but anyway last laugh is on tiegen because her recipes suck, but alison roman’s are genuinely really good. roman’s cancellation was part of a broader wave of cancellations within the food media world and of course hers was more bitter and vicious because it’s always easier to go after a young, successful liberal white woman for saying something wrong than it is to address actual issues. her cancellation was about social media mobs and jealousy.

Absolutely not. Her food is bland and boring like her.

All of the recipes of hers I’ve made have been really good. I cook and read recipes a lot so I know what I’m talking about. But thanks for confirming that this is about attacking her personally and not about the bona fides of the situation. Alison Roman losing her job because of some snarky musings vs Teigan’s vicious harassment of a vulnerable teen are completely different scales.

Let's not get into Alison Roman. As an Indian woman, I find her appropriation of ethnic food into random "stews" pretty gross (and the recipes suck, too)

anyone can make a chickpea stew. basic ingredients aren’t “appropriation” - if that were true we couldn’t use tomatoes, potatoes, or black pepper in the US. but yeah sure, Alison Roman publishing a stew recipe with garbanzo beans and coconut milk is totally the same as online bullying of teenage girl and telling her to kill herself.

and btw, the stew has like 16,000 5-star reviews on the NYTimes websites. She’s a good recipe writer. That’s in fact why people attack her, because social media hates successful young women or young women who attract attention at all.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:*laughs in Alison Roman*

As she should. I was disappointed and offended by Roman’s comments. She paid a high price for those comments and essentially torpedoed her career. I felt badly for Teigen at the time, a producer of Roman’s show. Teigen seemed genuinely stung and understandably so. But what a hypocrite, wow. History of bullying and harassing women. No, thank you.

roman’s comments were totally overblown - cancel culture at its worst. but in teigen’s defense, she actually didn’t join the cancellation attempts. but anyway last laugh is on tiegen because her recipes suck, but alison roman’s are genuinely really good. roman’s cancellation was part of a broader wave of cancellations within the food media world and of course hers was more bitter and vicious because it’s always easier to go after a young, successful liberal white woman for saying something wrong than it is to address actual issues. her cancellation was about social media mobs and jealousy.

Absolutely not. Her food is bland and boring like her.

All of the recipes of hers I’ve made have been really good. I cook and read recipes a lot so I know what I’m talking about. But thanks for confirming that this is about attacking her personally and not about the bona fides of the situation. Alison Roman losing her job because of some snarky musings vs Teigan’s vicious harassment of a vulnerable teen are completely different scales.

Let's not get into Alison Roman. As an Indian woman, I find her appropriation of ethnic food into random "stews" pretty gross (and the recipes suck, too)

anyone can make a chickpea stew. basic ingredients aren’t “appropriation” - if that were true we couldn’t use tomatoes, potatoes, or black pepper in the US. but yeah sure, Alison Roman publishing a stew recipe with garbanzo beans and coconut milk is totally the same as online bullying of teenage girl and telling her to kill herself.

I wasn't comparing the two!!!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The comments were horrible, Chrissy sucks and her actions and language are indefensible, but can Courtney Stodden just go away? I hate when people bring up stuff that happened 10+ years ago just because they want to be back in the news again. It's just a waste of everyone's time.

Agree.

Courtney was a very troubled, exploited teenager then and didn't have the ability to bring it up back then. Now Chrissy is complaining about being attacked on the internet and it's obviously going to piss off Courtney.

Objection overruled.

Yeah, no. Agree that Courtney needs to be cancelled too. All of them.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:*laughs in Alison Roman*

As she should. I was disappointed and offended by Roman’s comments. She paid a high price for those comments and essentially torpedoed her career. I felt badly for Teigen at the time, a producer of Roman’s show. Teigen seemed genuinely stung and understandably so. But what a hypocrite, wow. History of bullying and harassing women. No, thank you.

roman’s comments were totally overblown - cancel culture at its worst. but in teigen’s defense, she actually didn’t join the cancellation attempts. but anyway last laugh is on tiegen because her recipes suck, but alison roman’s are genuinely really good. roman’s cancellation was part of a broader wave of cancellations within the food media world and of course hers was more bitter and vicious because it’s always easier to go after a young, successful liberal white woman for saying something wrong than it is to address actual issues. her cancellation was about social media mobs and jealousy.

Absolutely not. Her food is bland and boring like her.

All of the recipes of hers I’ve made have been really good. I cook and read recipes a lot so I know what I’m talking about. But thanks for confirming that this is about attacking her personally and not about the bona fides of the situation. Alison Roman losing her job because of some snarky musings vs Teigan’s vicious harassment of a vulnerable teen are completely different scales.

Let's not get into Alison Roman. As an Indian woman, I find her appropriation of ethnic food into random "stews" pretty gross (and the recipes suck, too)

anyone can make a chickpea stew. basic ingredients aren’t “appropriation” - if that were true we couldn’t use tomatoes, potatoes, or black pepper in the US. but yeah sure, Alison Roman publishing a stew recipe with garbanzo beans and coconut milk is totally the same as online bullying of teenage girl and telling her to kill herself.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:*laughs in Alison Roman*

As she should. I was disappointed and offended by Roman’s comments. She paid a high price for those comments and essentially torpedoed her career. I felt badly for Teigen at the time, a producer of Roman’s show. Teigen seemed genuinely stung and understandably so. But what a hypocrite, wow. History of bullying and harassing women. No, thank you.

roman’s comments were totally overblown - cancel culture at its worst. but in teigen’s defense, she actually didn’t join the cancellation attempts. but anyway last laugh is on tiegen because her recipes suck, but alison roman’s are genuinely really good. roman’s cancellation was part of a broader wave of cancellations within the food media world and of course hers was more bitter and vicious because it’s always easier to go after a young, successful liberal white woman for saying something wrong than it is to address actual issues. her cancellation was about social media mobs and jealousy.

Absolutely not. Her food is bland and boring like her.

All of the recipes of hers I’ve made have been really good. I cook and read recipes a lot so I know what I’m talking about. But thanks for confirming that this is about attacking her personally and not about the bona fides of the situation. Alison Roman losing her job because of some snarky musings vs Teigan’s vicious harassment of a vulnerable teen are completely different scales.

Let's not get into Alison Roman. As an Indian woman, I find her appropriation of ethnic food into random "stews" pretty gross (and the recipes suck, too)