Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think y’all are being needlessly tough on OP/her daughter.
The amount of energy it takes to be a top high school student at a top school (especially in an intense area like DCUM-land!) is immense. One’s entire identity is wrapped up in being a good student and striving for the best. The sum of a full school day, extracurriculars, homework, basic self care, etc. is more intense — and involves more competing priorities — than most other busy periods in ones life.
OP’s daughter probably realized she worked to the point of deteriorating her QOL. She has a right to be frustrated with the situation even if the outcome is objectively fantastic.
I disagree vehemently with this line of thinking. One of my kids was a top student, a true intellectual, had excellent test scores, and was heavily involved in extracurriculars. Still, she knew how college admissions worked and didn't talk of "dream" schools. Her college list was, I'll bet, a lot like the OP's: Brown, Wesleyan, Carleton, Grinnell, and William & Mary. Brown was a reach, obviously, and she didn't even blink when she didn't get in. She thought Wesleyan to be a match, it looked that way on paper, and it was her first choice -- but Wesleyan rejected her too, while accepting her best friend. Carleton, on the other hand, accepted my daughter and rejected the best friend, confirming that at this level it really is a crapshoot. In the end, my daughter ended up at Grinnell and absolutely loved it, and she certainly didn't mope and regret all of her hard work in high school. Unlike OP and her daughter, she realized how lucky and privileged she is, and she reacted like a grown up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s unfortunate that only certain viewpoints are tolerated on DCUM. Public free speech, indeed.
You seem confused about what free speech is (multiple levels of confusion)
Anonymous wrote:My daughter is one of the average kids at our “Big 5”. Thought she’d be recruited for sports but it hasn’t worked out. Her reach schools aren’t close to being on the same level as your safeties. I will never stand around with DC moms and be able to brag about her school acceptances. I would get pity, all that money for “those” schools....
But she is excited about going to college and thinks that she’ll be happy at all the schools we’ve looked at, she can’t wait to play her sport for a club or intramural team since she can’t get on the varsity team. She is excited to find her place no matter where she ends up. And get a roommate, meet kids from other places, figure out the tutoring services, and get Chik FIL A (so many CFAs!) And that makes me so proud of her.
Anonymous wrote:This thread seems to have touched a nerve. I think this year has opened the eyes of the privileged regarding what happens when the masses awaken. In the past, private school kids in metros knew they would apply to elite schools, and they expected great results. With test optional, smart kids across the country of varying or no levels of privilege applied to the same schools. With greater competition, it’s less clear, now and in the future, that the privileged will have the access they once enjoyed. Many are mourning the loss.
Anonymous wrote:I think y’all are being needlessly tough on OP/her daughter.
The amount of energy it takes to be a top high school student at a top school (especially in an intense area like DCUM-land!) is immense. One’s entire identity is wrapped up in being a good student and striving for the best. The sum of a full school day, extracurriculars, homework, basic self care, etc. is more intense — and involves more competing priorities — than most other busy periods in ones life.
OP’s daughter probably realized she worked to the point of deteriorating her QOL. She has a right to be frustrated with the situation even if the outcome is objectively fantastic.
Anonymous wrote:It’s unfortunate that only certain viewpoints are tolerated on DCUM. Public free speech, indeed.
Anonymous wrote:Exactly ^^. You should not tell her it was the year. It’s not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I went to a big three, a couple decades ago. I kind of understand what you mean about working so hard. I got up at 6:30 in the morning and frequently did not go to bed until 1 o’clock at night. I worked all the time. I did sports, orchestra, drama, choir. I did community service. I got good grades. I want up going to a top 15 small liberal arts college, but not Amherst or Yale etc. Ultimately the sleep deprivation and constant stress did not seem worth it. I could’ve just focused on my grades and done one or two extracurriculars I actually enjoyed and gone to a school that was almost as good as the one I went to. I got waitlisted at three Ivies but did not get off the waitlist. My take away was to not do very many extracurriculars in college.
OP here: I have read through all the posts (and my own, which are mangled by my poor late-night grammar), but I think this one really encapsulates how she feels, for better or for worse. If she had known that she was going to wind-up at a school of this level, she feels she would have weighted her priorities differently and enjoyed life a bit more. As it stands, she's put everything into schoolwork and extracurrculars, and hasn't exactly reaped the benefits of this hard work. For what it's worth, I'd be perfectly happy for her to go to William and Mary, especially compared to these SLACs I don't know much about. Also, her counselor did class these schools as safeties for her stats, and it seems this was accurate in regard to her results at these schools.
OP, your DD is still working with the wrong assumption. This cycle, had she "enjoyed life a little more" she probably wouldn't have W&M or her SLACs to choose from. Emphasising this part is how to turn her from being upset to being grateful. Having her understand that her hard work DID pay off, but this year doesn't buy as much as years before. But it did buy her something, and that "something" is really quite impressive.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think y’all are being needlessly tough on OP/her daughter.
The amount of energy it takes to be a top high school student at a top school (especially in an intense area like DCUM-land!) is immense. One’s entire identity is wrapped up in being a good student and striving for the best. The sum of a full school day, extracurriculars, homework, basic self care, etc. is more intense — and involves more competing priorities — than most other busy periods in ones life.
OP’s daughter probably realized she worked to the point of deteriorating her QOL. She has a right to be frustrated with the situation even if the outcome is objectively fantastic.
It is very unhealthy to have your “whole identity” wrapped up in one thing.
Those are the type of people who kill themselves when the one thing goes south.
Maybe this will teach healthy balance.
Anonymous wrote:I think y’all are being needlessly tough on OP/her daughter.
The amount of energy it takes to be a top high school student at a top school (especially in an intense area like DCUM-land!) is immense. One’s entire identity is wrapped up in being a good student and striving for the best. The sum of a full school day, extracurriculars, homework, basic self care, etc. is more intense — and involves more competing priorities — than most other busy periods in ones life.
OP’s daughter probably realized she worked to the point of deteriorating her QOL. She has a right to be frustrated with the situation even if the outcome is objectively fantastic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think y’all are being needlessly tough on OP/her daughter.
The amount of energy it takes to be a top high school student at a top school (especially in an intense area like DCUM-land!) is immense. One’s entire identity is wrapped up in being a good student and striving for the best. The sum of a full school day, extracurriculars, homework, basic self care, etc. is more intense — and involves more competing priorities — than most other busy periods in ones life.
OP’s daughter probably realized she worked to the point of deteriorating her QOL. She has a right to be frustrated with the situation even if the outcome is objectively fantastic.
I think one issue is that OP doesn't realize that coming from a "Big 5" doesn't carry the same weight it might have once. This country is full of kids in public schools in areas outside of major urban centers who also work really hard, do extracurriculars, sports, and so forth, and also have great grades and test scores. Elite colleges want more of these kids, have the funds to subsidize their educations, and are less and less interested in hot-housed private school kids. Basically, take away "top 5 private" and OP's kid looks just like thousands and thousands of other kids around the country; nothing special or standout. She sounds like a smart, hard-working kid, and is getting accepted into exactly the match schools that suit her level of achievement. The issue is she thought she was better than that, but she really isn't.
Anonymous wrote:I think y’all are being needlessly tough on OP/her daughter.
The amount of energy it takes to be a top high school student at a top school (especially in an intense area like DCUM-land!) is immense. One’s entire identity is wrapped up in being a good student and striving for the best. The sum of a full school day, extracurriculars, homework, basic self care, etc. is more intense — and involves more competing priorities — than most other busy periods in ones life.
OP’s daughter probably realized she worked to the point of deteriorating her QOL. She has a right to be frustrated with the situation even if the outcome is objectively fantastic.
Anonymous wrote:It’s unfortunate that only certain viewpoints are tolerated on DCUM. Public free speech, indeed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a rough point in the admission season. Let her mourn. I would try not to talk about the decisions yet to come. If the subject of college is going to be discussed, I'd be comparing the current excellent options, which would be her preference, looking at admitted student groups, housing options, etc.
Keep in mind (perhaps without discussing with her) that experts predict extensive waitlist use this year, so while it's hard to judge from where you sit now, a waitlist acceptance is possible, especially if you are full pay.
As has been explained above, the "safeties" she's fortunate to be accepted to were actually targets due to low acceptance rates. Move them to the target category.
You are not the only one to notice that this is a crazy year for college admission - it has been in the press, see e.g. Melissa Korn at WSJ - and there will be many a college counselor with unfortunate egg on their faces for inaccurate predictions.
This! Best piece of advice I ever picked up on DCUM was, when figuring out safeties vs. matches for my kid, if the acceptance rate is 30 percent or less, it’s not a safety. Even if your kid’s stats are over the 75th percentile for test scores and above the average GPA. Consider it a strong match, but not a safety.
Grinnell’s acceptance rate is 23 percent, Skidmore’s is 30. Even though W&M is in the upper 30s, everyone knows it’s harder for girls to get accepted.