Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just can't understand how people think our rights weren't taken away.
It's one thing to agree with it, and to willingly be a subject to the state. But to deny that you're rights were ever taken away is a whole different level.
Some of our most fundamental American liberties: the right to worship, and the right to assemble, were taken from us.
And as we come out of this, we all need to be VERY concerned about the precedent that has set.
That's like saying that your freedom of speech is taken away because you're not allowed to shout "Fire!" in a crowded theater just for funsies.
Freedoms have always been limited where they cause harm to other people. Your right to swing your arm ends where my face begins.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just can't understand how people think our rights weren't taken away.
It's one thing to agree with it, and to willingly be a subject to the state. But to deny that you're rights were ever taken away is a whole different level.
Some of our most fundamental American liberties: the right to worship, and the right to assemble, were taken from us.
And as we come out of this, we all need to be VERY concerned about the precedent that has set.
You couldn’t worship?
You could.
Actually, churches are open in MoCo and many met outside.
Anonymous wrote:I just can't understand how people think our rights weren't taken away.
It's one thing to agree with it, and to willingly be a subject to the state. But to deny that you're rights were ever taken away is a whole different level.
Some of our most fundamental American liberties: the right to worship, and the right to assemble, were taken from us.
And as we come out of this, we all need to be VERY concerned about the precedent that has set.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just can't understand how people think our rights weren't taken away.
It's one thing to agree with it, and to willingly be a subject to the state. But to deny that you're rights were ever taken away is a whole different level.
Some of our most fundamental American liberties: the right to worship, and the right to assemble, were taken from us.
And as we come out of this, we all need to be VERY concerned about the precedent that has set.
You couldn’t worship?
You could.
For some religions communal celebration is fundamental. Private prayer is fine, but it is not the heart of the matter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just can't understand how people think our rights weren't taken away.
It's one thing to agree with it, and to willingly be a subject to the state. But to deny that you're rights were ever taken away is a whole different level.
Some of our most fundamental American liberties: the right to worship, and the right to assemble, were taken from us.
And as we come out of this, we all need to be VERY concerned about the precedent that has set.
You couldn’t worship?
You could.
Actually, churches are open in MoCo and many met outside.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just can't understand how people think our rights weren't taken away.
It's one thing to agree with it, and to willingly be a subject to the state. But to deny that you're rights were ever taken away is a whole different level.
Some of our most fundamental American liberties: the right to worship, and the right to assemble, were taken from us.
And as we come out of this, we all need to be VERY concerned about the precedent that has set.
You couldn’t worship?
You could.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just can't understand how people think our rights weren't taken away.
It's one thing to agree with it, and to willingly be a subject to the state. But to deny that you're rights were ever taken away is a whole different level.
Some of our most fundamental American liberties: the right to worship, and the right to assemble, were taken from us.
And as we come out of this, we all need to be VERY concerned about the precedent that has set.
You couldn’t worship?
You could.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Elrich - Missing the point that in a free society, the government should be least restrictive as possible, not the most. Rates are back to October and only headed downward with vaccines, but restrictions have not gone back to October levels.
Yes, but during a pandemic when individuals cannot take personal responsibility, we need the government to step in.
We obviously feel differently. But I think you're wrong. You may disagree with my risk threshold. But its still wrong to impose your risk threshold on me against my will
But then you are imposing your risk on other people.
In some ways, yes, every action anyone does may have an impact on anyone else in the community. Nothing we do happens in a vacuum.
But the difference between the two is that when I exercise my rights, you still have a choice in how you want to mitigate the risk and how you want to live according to your own personal risk threshold.
In the reverse, I have no choice, and your risk threshold is imposed on me.
There's a difference. If I was a saying 'yes, you must go to a gym. you must go to a restaurant. and you prohibited from wearing a mask', then that would be the opposite end of this spectrum.
DP. You don't even realize how self-centered your views are. You are rationalizing your less reponsible decisions by talking about risk mitigating - do you realize that the more risks YOU take, the more careful someone else has to be?
For example, if you insist on going somewhere without a mask, that means that the person who is higher-risk and takes things seriously won't be able to go out at all. Many people would just like to go for a masked walk in the park or go to their socially distant farmers market, but if you insist on going out unmasked and bringing your crowds stomping around everywhere and breathing all over the place, then you spoil it for the people who want to go out in public responsibly.
Anonymous wrote:I just can't understand how people think our rights weren't taken away.
It's one thing to agree with it, and to willingly be a subject to the state. But to deny that you're rights were ever taken away is a whole different level.
Some of our most fundamental American liberties: the right to worship, and the right to assemble, were taken from us.
And as we come out of this, we all need to be VERY concerned about the precedent that has set.