Anonymous wrote:Ummmm, this is just wrong on all kinds of levels. Tell him you're pregnant, then move home. I doubt if he'd be interested in the child anyway since he's seemed to have moved on, but not telling him is just wrong and the child will want to know his/her father. Don't make a jacked up situation worse.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are courts in the habit of allowing men to demand paternity tests from mothers when child support isn't part of the equation?
Also, this is a work of fiction, but I credit OP for a more compelling storyline than the usual Hallmark Romance and Lifetime Mystery reject scripts that get posted here. for that I award you with a B+/A-
Yes. If the man has reason to believe he is the father, he can petition to have paternity established. A friend believed he was the father of a high school gf’s oldest based on appearance and dates. He had no idea because she never told him. There was another man in the picture that was the only dad the little girl knew. Turned out my friend was the bio dad.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^unless you want your child to inherit something![]()
His family has millions. I don't want anything from him. I come from nothing. I'd rather be safe and away from him.
Yes, you say that now... but millions come in handy, my dear. How about you move back home, and pay for a consultation with a lawyer as soon as you arrive. You have the option of declaring this baby's parentage on the birth certificate, in the hope that due to the distance, visits will be few and far between, and cordial, and that your child's college might be paid for (by the time he goes to college, it might be $80K a year). Or, you might decide that it's best to not declare the father on the certificate...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I cannot believe the number of people supporting this plan. OP describes an abusive, controlling man with a lot of money who wants this kid. Does anyone really think she could pull this off without consequences?
OP, eventually this man will find out. When he does, it won't be a matter of sharing custody. It won't matter where he lives. You will lose custody. He will go to court and accuse you of lying and essentially kidnapping his child. And a judge will give him custody and you will be flying back here a handful of times a year for supervised visitation, which is all you will get. Just imagine how you will feel if after 2, 4, 7, or 10 years that child is taken away from you.
You would be insane to consider this. Insane. And that's not even considering the ethical problems.
You have two realistic options:
1. Abort and go about your life. Try a sperm donor if you want a baby now.
2. Go home for a vacation. Call you BF, break up with him, and tell him you're staying where you are. You will either work out a cross-country visitation schedule or he'll sue for custody (he'll have to sue where you have moved) and you'll have to fight in court. He may win, he may not.
That's it. They may be two imperfect choices, but you need to choose the most palatable and follow through. Trying to hide the baby is a truly awful, terrible idea that will bring you a great deal of pain.
Best of luck to you.
I find it really difficult believe a judge would do this with a best interest of the child standard and particularly if the mother had documented ohysical abuse. The most likely outcome is visits for dad, gradually building up to allowing the father to take the child out of state for more extended period. No judge is going to send a child out of state with a man the child has never met before, unless the mom is in jail or incapacitated. It’s not a “which parent acted worse” standard— it’s the best interest of the child.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From what you have said, your child’s father has cheated on you and has been verbally abusive for a few weeks. What on gods earth makes you think this gives you the right to have your shared a child, never tell him, and strip him of all parental rights? you do not get to choose for your child not to know their other parent simply because he has wronged you. And his having been verbally abusive toward you does not change that in anyway. You simply do not have the right to do what you are seeking to do. You have the right unilaterally to have an abortion, which you are choosing not to do. If you have a child it is your collective, joint child. How can you possibly think that this is the right decision? if anything, it shows that you have incredibly bad judgment and I would hope that your child would at least have the benefits of the best parts of you and your former fiancé as parents. and you wouldn’t really have your child need to avoid any social media presence due to your ridiculous decision making? To have to always wonder who his or her dad is? If I were ever to condone someone taking a child away from the child’s other parent, it would only be two to immediate, physical risk to the child, and certainly not several weeks of rubble of abuse toward me combined with my being upset I was cheated on.Honestly, what is wrong with you that you are so self absorbed?
Did you miss the part about him kicking me physically kicking me off of a bed?
I was sitting straight up and he kicked me several times to shove me off the foot of the bed. Maybe in your home you're okay with being verbally and now physically abused but I'm not.
Anonymous wrote:I'm sorry you're in such a tough spot. All I have to add is that, in the experience of my sister in law in New York, the documented physical abuse didn't matter because it was against her and not the child. And I'm talking about bruise marks on her neck after he strangled her against a door. So take that into account. Best wishes regardless of what you decide.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I cannot believe the number of people supporting this plan. OP describes an abusive, controlling man with a lot of money who wants this kid. Does anyone really think she could pull this off without consequences?
OP, eventually this man will find out. When he does, it won't be a matter of sharing custody. It won't matter where he lives. You will lose custody. He will go to court and accuse you of lying and essentially kidnapping his child. And a judge will give him custody and you will be flying back here a handful of times a year for supervised visitation, which is all you will get. Just imagine how you will feel if after 2, 4, 7, or 10 years that child is taken away from you.
You would be insane to consider this. Insane. And that's not even considering the ethical problems.
You have two realistic options:
1. Abort and go about your life. Try a sperm donor if you want a baby now.
2. Go home for a vacation. Call you BF, break up with him, and tell him you're staying where you are. You will either work out a cross-country visitation schedule or he'll sue for custody (he'll have to sue where you have moved) and you'll have to fight in court. He may win, he may not.
That's it. They may be two imperfect choices, but you need to choose the most palatable and follow through. Trying to hide the baby is a truly awful, terrible idea that will bring you a great deal of pain.
Best of luck to you.
I find it really difficult believe a judge would do this with a best interest of the child standard and particularly if the mother had documented ohysical abuse. The most likely outcome is visits for dad, gradually building up to allowing the father to take the child out of state for more extended period. No judge is going to send a child out of state with a man the child has never met before, unless the mom is in jail or incapacitated. It’s not a “which parent acted worse” standard— it’s the best interest of the child.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My sister went through this. The ex was cheating on her, didn't want a relationship. She moved several states away, to my parents' hometown. She had every reason to think that he would be distant at that point, but he followed her. She intended to leave him off the birth certificate; he forced it.
They managed to stay out of court, but if he'd wanted it he could have gotten court-ordered overnight visits with their child and she would have been stuck pumping for that purpose.
Judges really, really do not look kindly on what you are planning to do here, OP. This is 100% a bet on whether he will follow you.
You should have an abortion. Do not be an idiot about this.
This is exactly right. Also, and I haven't read all the posts, so someone probably (I hope!) raised this already, this is horribly unfair to the child - stripping him or her of any possibility to know and have a relationship with the father. You may think he's an ass, who abused you - and I'm sure you're right. But you obviously don't care about him in this scenario. But it's a terrible thing to do to a child, and you apparently don't care about that either. All you care about is what you want.
You're a moderately terrible person, OP.