Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:CT’s Gold Coast - Greenwich, Darien, Westport, New Canaan
Grew up in Westport. You can add Southport. Redding, Ridgefield, Madison, Weston ....
But not nicer than the Chicago suburbs....
No sorry, but CT beats any midwestern town by far
Why? I'm from Westport and think north shore suburbs of chicago are very similar but more charming and shorter/cheaper commutes into the city.
I'm not from either but have spent time in both and have to say those north shore Chicago suburbs are more charming.
I think Westport is lovely and so is Newton, Mass and so are Carmel, CA and LaJolla (although not really “suburbs”)....but the BEST suburb in All of America is the North Shore of Chicago.
So, no, sadly, CT does not “beat any midwestern town by far.” Not Winnetka.
oh PLEASE. Completely disagree. The Gold Coast of CT is one of the wealthiest places IN THE WORLD. Look it up. CT has an "off the mayflower" feel that can't be replicated by anything else. It's not just a money thing. The history, the abundance of private schools and clubs, the nautical feel, the generations of wall streeters that have made their homes there....sigh..you have to get it.
North shore became affluent AFTER WORLD WAR II for heavens sake....
Anonymous wrote:La Jolla is essentially a San Diego suburb.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The problem with the Midwest is that it takes soooo long to get anywhere. Even from Chicago, what is there...Lake Michigan? So many more options within 2-4 hrs in your average east coast town. That’s why I’d always pick an east coast suburb...of course California is paradise too
First Lake Michigan is awesome. I would take Lake Michigan over the Long Island Sound. And even though I am a native NYer, I actually prefer Chicago as a city. That said, it is true that when I lived in Chicago I felt that there were not as many different things within driving distance for a day or weekend trip than when I lived in the northeast. But in terms of the attributes of the town/suburb itself, the Chicago suburbs are tough to beat.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:CT’s Gold Coast - Greenwich, Darien, Westport, New Canaan
Grew up in Westport. You can add Southport. Redding, Ridgefield, Madison, Weston ....
But not nicer than the Chicago suburbs....
No sorry, but CT beats any midwestern town by far
Why? I'm from Westport and think north shore suburbs of chicago are very similar but more charming and shorter/cheaper commutes into the city.
I'm not from either but have spent time in both and have to say those north shore Chicago suburbs are more charming.
I think Westport is lovely and so is Newton, Mass and so are Carmel, CA and LaJolla (although not really “suburbs”)....but the BEST suburb in All of America is the North Shore of Chicago.
So, no, sadly, CT does not “beat any midwestern town by far.” Not Winnetka.
oh PLEASE. Completely disagree. The Gold Coast of CT is one of the wealthiest places IN THE WORLD. Look it up. CT has an "off the mayflower" feel that can't be replicated by anything else. It's not just a money thing. The history, the abundance of private schools and clubs, the nautical feel, the generations of wall streeters that have made their homes there....sigh..you have to get it.
North shore became affluent AFTER WORLD WAR II for heavens sake....
Anonymous wrote:La Jolla, Scottsdale and Bethesda
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:La Jolla, CA.
Germantown, Columbus OH
Highland Park, Dallas
Pacific Palisades, CA
There is no Germantown outside of Columbus. German Village is a neighborhood in Columbus.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The problem with the Midwest is that it takes soooo long to get anywhere. Even from Chicago, what is there...Lake Michigan? So many more options within 2-4 hrs in your average east coast town. That’s why I’d always pick an east coast suburb...of course California is paradise too
First Lake Michigan is awesome. I would take Lake Michigan over the Long Island Sound. And even though I am a native NYer, I actually prefer Chicago as a city. That said, it is true that when I lived in Chicago I felt that there were not as many different things within driving distance for a day or weekend trip than when I lived in the northeast. But in terms of the attributes of the town/suburb itself, the Chicago suburbs are tough to beat.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kailua, outside of Honolulu.
Most of my family lives in Honolulu (gosh I like typing that word) but if I ever move back it will be to Kailua. Bike-able everywhere.
Born and raised in Honolulu. Kailua is pretty, but the architecture is very hit-or-miss. If you want nice homes and the water, Diamond Head or Portlock are much nicer than Kailua.
I am not thinking about rich or impressive. I love the vibe of Kailua. Portlock is nasty rich, no vibe. Not bike-able or walk-able to anything. My church (Unity) is on Diamond Head, and my nieces went to La Pietra Hawaii School for Girls on Diamond Head, but I don't find them particularly charming in an "i want to live there" way.
I lived in Waikiki (The Wailana) and Hawaii Kai for 5 years. All in, I love Waikiki the most. But it's not a suburb.
Anonymous wrote:The problem with the Midwest is that it takes soooo long to get anywhere. Even from Chicago, what is there...Lake Michigan? So many more options within 2-4 hrs in your average east coast town. That’s why I’d always pick an east coast suburb...of course California is paradise too