Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Or perhaps use of those phrases is just proof that SR taught critical thinking and the value of questioning authority. Your call, PP.
But sure, you can tell your friends at Congressional or BS all about the big bad liberals who graduate from SR and send their children there.
You're not really interested in having an objective discussion about this, are you?
Anonymous wrote:Or perhaps use of those phrases is just proof that SR taught critical thinking and the value of questioning authority. Your call, PP.
But sure, you can tell your friends at Congressional or BS all about the big bad liberals who graduate from SR and send their children there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Please don't use religion to support critical race theory. They aren't close to being the same thing. CRT is the exact opposite of "inclusivity." It's shrouded in buzzwords that sound good, but it divides people and teaches them that they're victims or that they're guilty based on the colour of their skin.
I bet you're a really nice person who is trying to do the right thing for everyone. But if you dug down into the details of what CRT is actually about, you might rethink your support of what SR is doing.
Did you know that in the 80s, some parents rioted because SR taught liberation theology?
The completely intellectually dishonest uproar about CRT (which, incidentally, has been a thing since WAY before BLM or Kendi, if you — I don’t know — went to college in the last 30 years) is just another flavor of the same streak of regressive conservatism that fed that uproar.
Anonymous wrote:Please don't use religion to support critical race theory. They aren't close to being the same thing. CRT is the exact opposite of "inclusivity." It's shrouded in buzzwords that sound good, but it divides people and teaches them that they're victims or that they're guilty based on the colour of their skin.
I bet you're a really nice person who is trying to do the right thing for everyone. But if you dug down into the details of what CRT is actually about, you might rethink your support of what SR is doing.
Anonymous wrote:For everyone here who is opposed to DEI/CRT, how exactly do you want SR and other schools to tackle our nation's historic and systemic racism? What will make you and your daughters "comfortable" in discussing racism and the role it has played in our nation's justice system, housing policies, insurance offerings, transportation systems, athletic opportunities, grocery locations, health care systems, academic opportunities, farming policies, and so on? is there a level of being "uncomfortable" that you can live with?
Any time our schools and other American institutions try to discuss race and discrimination there is always push back from people who are uncomfortable. There is push back almost every time, usually by white Americans, who claim that is is not appropriate, not the right time, not the right format, not seeing things from "all sides," etc. We just went through Colin Kapernick getting assailed for taking a non-violent stance to protest police brutality by kneeling at the national anthem. When other athletes started to join him, there was tremendous opposition, especially on the political right. And remember, when MLK was assassinated a majority of Americans thought he was too radical. So there never seems to be a right time, right format, right way to discuss racism in America.
So, what would you replace the DEI effort at Sr with?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Please don't use religion to support critical race theory. They aren't close to being the same thing. CRT is the exact opposite of "inclusivity." It's shrouded in buzzwords that sound good, but it divides people and teaches them that they're victims or that they're guilty based on the colour of their skin.
I bet you're a really nice person who is trying to do the right thing for everyone. But if you dug down into the details of what CRT is actually about, you might rethink your support of what SR is doing.
+1 DP here . . . I have worked in the D&I space for decades faced different forms of personal discrimination, have family members who have dedicated their lives to working towards inclusion, and unfortunately had an older child that faced discrimination comments from staff at a Sacred Heart School. However, posters are confusing wanting inclusion, embracing diversity, fighting racism as automatically meaning you should then support CRT as an approach. Agree with this poster - I assume that people come with good intentions, but dig deeper from different sources on CRT. And even after a deep dive, if you agree with the principles, realize that its still relatively new and how the messaging is delivered - particularly to young kids, is a big testing ground.
I personally think Jesus himself would be supportive of inclusivity as it brings more people into the christian community.
Anonymous wrote:Please don't use religion to support critical race theory. They aren't close to being the same thing. CRT is the exact opposite of "inclusivity." It's shrouded in buzzwords that sound good, but it divides people and teaches them that they're victims or that they're guilty based on the colour of their skin.
I bet you're a really nice person who is trying to do the right thing for everyone. But if you dug down into the details of what CRT is actually about, you might rethink your support of what SR is doing.
Anonymous wrote:Please don't use religion to support critical race theory. They aren't close to being the same thing. CRT is the exact opposite of "inclusivity." It's shrouded in buzzwords that sound good, but it divides people and teaches them that they're victims or that they're guilty based on the colour of their skin.
I bet you're a really nice person who is trying to do the right thing for everyone. But if you dug down into the details of what CRT is actually about, you might rethink your support of what SR is doing.
Anonymous wrote:I support DEI work in general. What I don't support is the Upper School requiring all students to sign up for an affinity club. It made students uncomfortable, and although it could have been encouraged, the ideas of freedom of choice (as in choice not to join) should have encouraged as well. If the school stays on this trajectory, our current middle school daughter will be applying to Visi. Because we chose not to apply to Holton or NCS for just this reason -- too liberal. SR used to be a nice balance but.....