Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Side deals are not just "noise". They have to be disclosed as part of the plea agreement. If it happened, and wasn't disclosed, that is a big problem.

No original 302. Tricked him into the interview by telling him he didn't need counsel at it. Extorted him to plead guilty.

This is the third time the judge has had to tell original counsel to give everything to his current counsel. The judge already ordered original counsel to appear before the DC Ethics Counsel because of all this.

DOJ withholds exculpatory evidence. It goes on and on.

This whole thing stinks.

But it didn't happen, ergo not a problem.

They didn't "trick him" into an interview. His elocution and the statements from the agents confirm that.

The judge's orders with respect to the original counsel have NOTHING to do with what you think it does.

You are taking a bunch of barely related facts and trying to concoct a big conspiracy against Misha Flynn.

The email from the Covington lawyer clearly said that there was a side deal. It said there was a lawyer's agreement not to prosecute Flynn's son. That was NOT disclosed in the plea agreement.

We'll see what the judge says.

That's the opposite of what the emails clearly say. Maybe they were written in code? Code that only you know.

That's the opposite of what the emails clearly say. Maybe they were written in code? Code that only you know.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Side deals are not just "noise". They have to be disclosed as part of the plea agreement. If it happened, and wasn't disclosed, that is a big problem.

No original 302. Tricked him into the interview by telling him he didn't need counsel at it. Extorted him to plead guilty.

This is the third time the judge has had to tell original counsel to give everything to his current counsel. The judge already ordered original counsel to appear before the DC Ethics Counsel because of all this.

DOJ withholds exculpatory evidence. It goes on and on.

This whole thing stinks.

But it didn't happen, ergo not a problem.

They didn't "trick him" into an interview. His elocution and the statements from the agents confirm that.

The judge's orders with respect to the original counsel have NOTHING to do with what you think it does.

You are taking a bunch of barely related facts and trying to concoct a big conspiracy against Misha Flynn.

The email from the Covington lawyer clearly said that there was a side deal. It said there was a lawyer's agreement not to prosecute Flynn's son. That was NOT disclosed in the plea agreement.

We'll see what the judge says.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Side deals are not just "noise". They have to be disclosed as part of the plea agreement. If it happened, and wasn't disclosed, that is a big problem.

No original 302. Tricked him into the interview by telling him he didn't need counsel at it. Extorted him to plead guilty.

This is the third time the judge has had to tell original counsel to give everything to his current counsel. The judge already ordered original counsel to appear before the DC Ethics Counsel because of all this.

DOJ withholds exculpatory evidence. It goes on and on.

This whole thing stinks.

But it didn't happen, ergo not a problem.

They didn't "trick him" into an interview. His elocution and the statements from the agents confirm that.

The judge's orders with respect to the original counsel have NOTHING to do with what you think it does.

You are taking a bunch of barely related facts and trying to concoct a big conspiracy against Misha Flynn.

But it didn't happen, ergo not a problem.

Anonymous wrote:
Side deals are not just "noise". They have to be disclosed as part of the plea agreement. If it happened, and wasn't disclosed, that is a big problem.

No original 302. Tricked him into the interview by telling him he didn't need counsel at it. Extorted him to plead guilty.

This is the third time the judge has had to tell original counsel to give everything to his current counsel. The judge already ordered original counsel to appear before the DC Ethics Counsel because of all this.

DOJ withholds exculpatory evidence. It goes on and on.

This whole thing stinks.

Anonymous wrote:

He also told his lie to Pence and to the public. It's possible that he was truthful to the FBI but they wrote his words falsely, while saying that he was convincing.

That scenario is all pretty convoluted and you're giving Flynn and the FBI way too much credit. The reality is that Flynn is a kook and a liar. And has no honor.

Doesn't matter. He was framed.

Talked to a retired career fed prosecutor yesterday. He said that it is almost impossible to reverse a guilty plea--BUT that if there was proof of a "side deal" which was not stated in the plea, then all bets are off. But, he also said, that if a jury were to become involved it would be very hard to get a "guilty" verdict if he pled based on protecting his son.

However, there has been a tweet of emails among the Covington lawyers indicating that there was a side deal. If that is true, Sullivan will likely dismiss.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

He also told his lie to Pence and to the public. It's possible that he was truthful to the FBI but they wrote his words falsely, while saying that he was convincing.

That scenario is all pretty convoluted and you're giving Flynn and the FBI way too much credit. The reality is that Flynn is a kook and a liar. And has no honor.

Doesn't matter. He was framed.

Talked to a retired career fed prosecutor yesterday. He said that it is almost impossible to reverse a guilty plea--BUT that if there was proof of a "side deal" which was not stated in the plea, then all bets are off. But, he also said, that if a jury were to become involved it would be very hard to get a "guilty" verdict if he pled based on protecting his son.

However, there has been a tweet of emails among the Covington lawyers indicating that there was a side deal. If that is true, Sullivan will likely dismiss.

Oh jeez.

He lied. And did other stuff so took the plea deal. Side deals, etc. are just noise. And your retired prosecutor friend has lost the plot.

Anonymous wrote:

He also told his lie to Pence and to the public. It's possible that he was truthful to the FBI but they wrote his words falsely, while saying that he was convincing.

That scenario is all pretty convoluted and you're giving Flynn and the FBI way too much credit. The reality is that Flynn is a kook and a liar. And has no honor.

Doesn't matter. He was framed.

Talked to a retired career fed prosecutor yesterday. He said that it is almost impossible to reverse a guilty plea--BUT that if there was proof of a "side deal" which was not stated in the plea, then all bets are off. But, he also said, that if a jury were to become involved it would be very hard to get a "guilty" verdict if he pled based on protecting his son.

However, there has been a tweet of emails among the Covington lawyers indicating that there was a side deal. If that is true, Sullivan will likely dismiss.

He also told his lie to Pence and to the public. It's possible that he was truthful to the FBI but they wrote his words falsely, while saying that he was convincing.

That scenario is all pretty convoluted and you're giving Flynn and the FBI way too much credit. The reality is that Flynn is a kook and a liar. And has no honor.

Anonymous wrote:Flynn, not once, but twice, before two different judges, affirmed his perjury.

Sorry, not framed.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:General Flynn was framed.

How's the weather in Moscow?

Old, tired, and terribly uncreative.

You mean you aren't a Russian troll? You really believe what you wrote?