Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Prosecutor John Durham, appointed 5 months ago to investigate the origins of the Russia probe, has not requested interviews with any of the FBI or DOJ officials who were involved in opening it. So what exactly are Durham and Barr looking at?
https://www.politico.com/amp/news/2019/10/05/justice-department-russia-probe-028545?__twitter_impression=true

An actual witch hunt. Fortunately, both the Aussies and Italians told them where to stick it. Not sure if the UK will do the same, we'll see. If they want the "dirt" from Mifsud, they should go to Moscow.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This ends with Barr indicted by a federal grand jury in 2021 when he is out of office.

You wish. America has reached its breaking point because of people like you. We'll come out of every nook and cranny to keep the likes of you out of office. Have a great day.

Anonymous wrote:This ends with Barr indicted by a federal grand jury in 2021 when he is out of office.

Anonymous wrote:This ends with Barr indicted by a federal grand jury in 2021 when he is out of office.

Anonymous wrote:Prosecutor John Durham, appointed 5 months ago to investigate the origins of the Russia probe, has not requested interviews with any of the FBI or DOJ officials who were involved in opening it. So what exactly are Durham and Barr looking at?
https://www.politico.com/amp/news/2019/10/05/justice-department-russia-probe-028545?__twitter_impression=true

Anonymous wrote:Prosecutor John Durham, appointed 5 months ago to investigate the origins of the Russia probe, has not requested interviews with any of the FBI or DOJ officials who were involved in opening it. So what exactly are Durham and Barr looking at?
https://www.politico.com/amp/news/2019/10/05/justice-department-russia-probe-028545?__twitter_impression=true

Anonymous wrote:They are literally working with the Russians to gather "evidence" to prove that the Russians didn't attack us.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People, this was put out there to move your interest away from the real problem: Trump threatening to withhold military aid unless Ukraine helped him make dirt about his political opponent -- bad conduct.

All of that is unrelated to the Justice department conspiracy-theory probe into the origins of Russiagate. That investigation may be stupid and waste of money, but it probably isn't illegal.

Keep your eye on the ball and don't let them whip you up about the side-show. They really, really want to roll Ukraine into that, and it isn't the same thing at all.

Actually, that thing about the "dirt" was entirely fabricated by Adam Schiff in his opening statement to DNI Maguire's testimony. Later on during the hearing, Schiff claimed he wasn't "lying," it was simply his version of a "parody."

Yet the MSM are using Schiff's "lie/parody" of "digging up dirt" supposedly requested by Trump as the prevailing meme. And so are you.

Parodies are for clowns. Schiff is a clown. Are you?

And, let's not forget that Nancy Pelosi then went on 60 Minutes and accused Trump of trying to get Ukraine to "create" information.

It is no surprise that the Democrats are making statements that simply are not true.

Given that there was no investigation that involved Hunter Biden and no evidence of any wrongdoing, the only way there was going to be "dirt" is if it were manufactured.

LOL, so that's where you're getting the "make shit up" accusation? First, we've been told there was an investigation and it turned up nothing on Hunter. So was there not an investigation? Trump saying, "look into what actually happened with Burisma and Hunter Biden" means "make some shit up?" Please.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People, this was put out there to move your interest away from the real problem: Trump threatening to withhold military aid unless Ukraine helped him make dirt about his political opponent -- bad conduct.

All of that is unrelated to the Justice department conspiracy-theory probe into the origins of Russiagate. That investigation may be stupid and waste of money, but it probably isn't illegal.

Keep your eye on the ball and don't let them whip you up about the side-show. They really, really want to roll Ukraine into that, and it isn't the same thing at all.

Actually, that thing about the "dirt" was entirely fabricated by Adam Schiff in his opening statement to DNI Maguire's testimony. Later on during the hearing, Schiff claimed he wasn't "lying," it was simply his version of a "parody."

Yet the MSM are using Schiff's "lie/parody" of "digging up dirt" supposedly requested by Trump as the prevailing meme. And so are you.

Parodies are for clowns. Schiff is a clown. Are you?

And, let's not forget that Nancy Pelosi then went on 60 Minutes and accused Trump of trying to get Ukraine to "create" information.

It is no surprise that the Democrats are making statements that simply are not true.

Given that there was no investigation that involved Hunter Biden and no evidence of any wrongdoing, the only way there was going to be "dirt" is if it were manufactured.

Anonymous wrote:Barr and Pompeo are literally working with the Russians to manufacture fear, uncertainty and doubt on the Mueller investigation by acquiring and relying on the testimony of Simona Morganta's former boss, Josef Mifsud in the case. I am sure he is going to (falsely) claim he was a western intelligence officer primed to give Papadopolous false information.

I am not even sure why it would matter...Papadopolous still blabbed about it to the Aussie diplomat, which pushed the US IC into an investigation.