Anonymous wrote:I think this can all be solved if dad says "you can move in if you promise to either a) re-enroll in school within 3 months, or b) get a job within 3 months". Bet you anything stepdaughter will no longer want to move in. And if she does move in and is actually motivated to get a job and a life, it's a win for everyone - she will make friends and/or have money and I'm guessing she will want to live someplace a little more fun and enjoyable than dad and stepmom's tiny house.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When this girl’s father married OP, she apparently lost a father.....
There are great stepmothers out there and lots of bad ones.
Just selfish people who mess up their kids for ever. I am not surprised that the 22 year old DD is not thriving. How can she? She is the kid from a broken home and her dad has moved on with a selfish witch!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a child of a failed marriage,so I do not expect her to have a bright future. Cautionary tale of what happens to the children of divorce, and why not to have kids with irresponsible people. These kids do not have the security of a roof over their head if something goes wrong!
This person is being discussed as if she is a burden on these people's life. I hope she does not have the misfortune to read this forum and self harm herself.
You think only "failed marriages" put limits on whether young adult children can live at home rent-free, without looking for a job, and without being in school? Really?
Biological parents in intact marriages want their biological children to succeed. They get their children the help and support needed - logistical, therapy, monetary, educational- to see that they launch. This is not common in broken families and 50% of American marriages end in divorce.
Some cultures do a better job of parenting than other cultures. In my personal experience, White parents tend to be more money minded and less willing to inconvenience themselves for their adult children and vice versa.
That's amazing. You literally don't believe that dysfunctional "intact" families exist. You believe that families -- so long as there is not divorce -- cannot be involved in abuse of children (including psychological), that there are not parents who drive their biological children to be like them at the expense of the children's mental health, that Bad Things Do Not Happen to kids unless their parents are divorced.
That's really quite amazing.
Not a previous PP, but you are being extreme. Of course abuse, neglect, and crappy parenting can happen in two biological parent households. But kids of divorced parents have a harder road no matter how you slice it. Even if their parents are average-good, it is still a harder road for them with less feelings of security, less assets for them, more turmoil Maybe they dislike a stepparent, or one/both parent is very engaged in dating and finding a mate they become selfish and neglectful, or don't get along with a step sibling, or one parent had more kids and is too busy with the younger ones to give older/young adult proper guidance...so many variables come up making their road harder.
Anonymous wrote:When this girl’s father married OP, she apparently lost a father.....
There are great stepmothers out there and lots of bad ones.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"Harder road" is not what PP claimed. She made it very black-and-white clear: Biological parents give support, non-biological do not.
I'm amazed at this, especially given the eloquent support just detailed in multiple posts by one stepmother above.
I'm not convinced that a woman who leaves a bad marriages and goes on to marry a stable, kind partner, isn't in a better position to support her children. Whatever problems there are, I don't think staying in an unhealthy and abusive relationship would have magically fixed them.
If you want to talk about trends, then do so. Don't phrase your claims as absolutes if they aren't. (Of course, that's less sexy and rhetorically powerful, but that's the breaks when you are honest.)
The OP if this thread does not want her non-biological step daughter to move in. Case closed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a child of a failed marriage,so I do not expect her to have a bright future. Cautionary tale of what happens to the children of divorce, and why not to have kids with irresponsible people. These kids do not have the security of a roof over their head if something goes wrong!
This person is being discussed as if she is a burden on these people's life. I hope she does not have the misfortune to read this forum and self harm herself.
You think only "failed marriages" put limits on whether young adult children can live at home rent-free, without looking for a job, and without being in school? Really?
Biological parents in intact marriages want their biological children to succeed. They get their children the help and support needed - logistical, therapy, monetary, educational- to see that they launch. This is not common in broken families and 50% of American marriages end in divorce.
Some cultures do a better job of parenting than other cultures. In my personal experience, White parents tend to be more money minded and less willing to inconvenience themselves for their adult children and vice versa.
My child is not my biological child. So, we don’t want her to succeed.
Anonymous wrote:"Harder road" is not what PP claimed. She made it very black-and-white clear: Biological parents give support, non-biological do not.
I'm amazed at this, especially given the eloquent support just detailed in multiple posts by one stepmother above.
I'm not convinced that a woman who leaves a bad marriages and goes on to marry a stable, kind partner, isn't in a better position to support her children. Whatever problems there are, I don't think staying in an unhealthy and abusive relationship would have magically fixed them.
If you want to talk about trends, then do so. Don't phrase your claims as absolutes if they aren't. (Of course, that's less sexy and rhetorically powerful, but that's the breaks when you are honest.)
Anonymous wrote:Right now I'm dating a divorced dad with a near-20-year-old who spends all day smoking weed in his bedroom.
Hope you're smart enough not to move in with the dad. Even if it's after the son has moved out, the son could want to move back in at any moment, and that would suck.
PPS: Just to be clear, I offer NO advice to his dad on what to do. Not my place.
If the kid moves out, and you decide to move in, better make it clear that the kid moving back in is a deal-breaker.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a child of a failed marriage,so I do not expect her to have a bright future. Cautionary tale of what happens to the children of divorce, and why not to have kids with irresponsible people. These kids do not have the security of a roof over their head if something goes wrong!
This person is being discussed as if she is a burden on these people's life. I hope she does not have the misfortune to read this forum and self harm herself.
You think only "failed marriages" put limits on whether young adult children can live at home rent-free, without looking for a job, and without being in school? Really?
Biological parents in intact marriages want their biological children to succeed. They get their children the help and support needed - logistical, therapy, monetary, educational- to see that they launch. This is not common in broken families and 50% of American marriages end in divorce.
Some cultures do a better job of parenting than other cultures. In my personal experience, White parents tend to be more money minded and less willing to inconvenience themselves for their adult children and vice versa.
Right now I'm dating a divorced dad with a near-20-year-old who spends all day smoking weed in his bedroom.
PPS: Just to be clear, I offer NO advice to his dad on what to do. Not my place.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a child of a failed marriage,so I do not expect her to have a bright future. Cautionary tale of what happens to the children of divorce, and why not to have kids with irresponsible people. These kids do not have the security of a roof over their head if something goes wrong!
This person is being discussed as if she is a burden on these people's life. I hope she does not have the misfortune to read this forum and self harm herself.
You think only "failed marriages" put limits on whether young adult children can live at home rent-free, without looking for a job, and without being in school? Really?
Biological parents in intact marriages want their biological children to succeed. They get their children the help and support needed - logistical, therapy, monetary, educational- to see that they launch. This is not common in broken families and 50% of American marriages end in divorce.
Some cultures do a better job of parenting than other cultures. In my personal experience, White parents tend to be more money minded and less willing to inconvenience themselves for their adult children and vice versa.
That's amazing. You literally don't believe that dysfunctional "intact" families exist. You believe that families -- so long as there is not divorce -- cannot be involved in abuse of children (including psychological), that there are not parents who drive their biological children to be like them at the expense of the children's mental health, that Bad Things Do Not Happen to kids unless their parents are divorced.
That's really quite amazing.