Anonymous wrote:It looks to me like all men should be banned from teen volleyball tournaments since they will walk around with erections.

As a ample breasted woman, are girls really playing volleyball without bras on these days? Sounds really painful.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Then don't be mad that teen boys are walking around with erections looking at your jiggling daughters!

That is exactly how their body is supposed to work, after all.

Sounds like those boys are the ones with a problem.

x100.

There is nothing wrong or unnatural about a teen boy getting an erection at the sight of breasts.

Just like there’s nothing wrong or unnatural about teen girls having breasts with nipples. How about the girls take care of any issues they’re having with their own parts, the boys take responsibility for any issues they’re having with their own parts, and we stop holding either of them responsible for the bodies of the other.

I don't take issue with teen boys getting erect at the sight of niples and breasts. I don't take issue with bare breastseither, or visible breasts through shirts. Hopefully you and your daughter won't take issue also at the sight of an erection.

In Irkutsk it is generally too cool or cold to go without bra. Maybe daughter should move to colder climate. No more problem with society nipple trauma.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Then don't be mad that teen boys are walking around with erections looking at your jiggling daughters!

That is exactly how their body is supposed to work, after all.

Sounds like those boys are the ones with a problem.

x100.

Sorry, why is an erect penis a "problem"? Men have penises, just like we have arms and legs. They get erect for all kinds of reasons, just like nipples and their primary daily use is for urination. Don't unduly sexualize them, especially when you are talking about teenage boys (children). If you don't like seeing erect ones, then look the other way. Not our problem.

I have no problem with boys and erections since it happens even without a source to blame it on... but the PP is responding to somebody who thinks erections are a problem.

I see them on the beach, at middle/high school, at home... on a bus, I see them on Gus, I see them on a train, I see them in the rain, I see them here and there, I see them everywhere.

Anonymous wrote:[flash]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It used to be expected that a woman would wear pantyhose, a hat and gloves. Bras are no different. I wear tight fitting spandex camisoles instead of bras often and I'm 48. And NOT small chested.
Deal with it.

That sounds even more uncomfortable than a bra.

It's not, brainiac. That's why I mention it.

Aren’t you a charmer.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Then don't be mad that teen boys are walking around with erections looking at your jiggling daughters!

That is exactly how their body is supposed to work, after all.

Sounds like those boys are the ones with a problem.

x100.

Sorry, why is an erect penis a "problem"? Men have penises, just like we have arms and legs. They get erect for all kinds of reasons, just like nipples and their primary daily use is for urination. Don't unduly sexualize them, especially when you are talking about teenage boys (children). If you don't like seeing erect ones, then look the other way. Not our problem.

OMG nipples. The horror! I had no idea all females had these! What a revelation!

It looks to me like all men should be banned from teen volleyball tournaments since they will walk around with erections.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This reminds me of the Notre Dame Mom who complained about girls wearing leggings.

Leggings are not pants. Repeat.

If you are wearing leggings, wear tops that cover your butt and camel toes. Gracias!

"Leggings are not pants" is my very most favorite DCUM sentence. I think I'm going to start saying it at random times in conversation, alternating with "Fifty-four forty or fight!"

(DCUM has never yet told me what leggings are. Shirts? Socks? An abomination?)

I’m a little weirded out by the poster who keeps referencing nudist colonies. Have you actually lived in one PP? Whenever I think of one, I just imagine it filled with really old saggy aged hippies with rashes and sunburn.

Assuming your not just generally pro-nudism, I think tHe whole bra question comes down to context—what you’re wearing and where. Unfortunately, teens aren’t always the greatest at making contextual decisions. A teen girl who is flashing grandpa probably should be told “Dp you realize you’re flashing grandpa every time you bend over to play your bridge hand? Maybe put on a t-shirt, or maybe a bra under the dress?” I don’t think that’s sexist. The male breast, female breast comparison is a false equivalency. If someone told a girl that she needed to be topless to compete on swim team, because there’s nothing sexual about breasts and the boys are also topless, we would recognize the false equivalency and say that was harassing and discriminatory. The fact of the matter is that gender relations are highly social constructed, and in our social structure, female breasts have a different connotation that male breasts.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just showed this thread to my 18-year-old daughter who rolled her eyes and refers you to the following link where none of the models are wearing bras.

https://www.urbanoutfitters.com/womens-tops

And they’ve all had their nipples airbrushed out (probably along with some other parts of their body), so I’m not sure they are a realistic reference point.

Point was braless is a thing these days (i.e., OP’s original question).

Anonymous wrote:I just showed this thread to my 18-year-old daughter who rolled her eyes and refers you to the following link where none of the models are wearing bras.

https://www.urbanoutfitters.com/womens-tops

And they’ve all had their nipples airbrushed out (probably along with some other parts of their body), so I’m not sure they are a realistic reference point.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I really struggle to understand people who sit and stare at others' bodies. Do you truly have nothing else going on in your life? I don't look at men to see if they are wearing tighty whities or boxers, why would I stare at teen girls' chests? It's disturbingly impulsive behavior, perhaps something to bring up to your doctor or therapist.

If the man is walking around in public without pants or is naked or is wearing only his underwear, I am sure I would stare in disgust and then report him to the police. Do not make it a gender issue. Sexual organs, breast, ass - they need to be covered. For hygiene and for modesty. Since men usually do not have boobs, they can go shirtless on a beach, but I will absolutely expect a man to be wearing a shirt in public place.

Breast are not sexual organs. Men have them too. The only difference is that female breast are able to nourish a child.

Anonymous wrote:Pp how do you know teen boys on nudist colonies don't get erections?

Do you know that a teen boy can have an erection over absolutely nothing?

Maybe the braless girl has nothing to do with a classmate's erection.

I'm sure they do get erections, it's a normal teenage thing. But they aren't walking around with a perma-erection from those slutty, slutty topless girls.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Then don't be mad that teen boys are walking around with erections looking at your jiggling daughters!

That is exactly how their body is supposed to work, after all.

Sounds like those boys are the ones with a problem.

x100.

There is nothing wrong or unnatural about a teen boy getting an erection at the sight of breasts.

Just like there’s nothing wrong or unnatural about teen girls having breasts with nipples. How about the girls take care of any issues they’re having with their own parts, the boys take responsibility for any issues they’re having with their own parts, and we stop holding either of them responsible for the bodies of the other.