Anonymous wrote:Were the Republican candidates invited?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Will the Herndon pta or any other Herndon community groups be hosting candidate forums? I didn't find anything from Google.
Sheila Olem and Cesar Del Aguila organized a Herndon event for Elaine Tholen on Station Street in early September.
Anonymous wrote:Will the Herndon pta or any other Herndon community groups be hosting candidate forums? I didn't find anything from Google.
. Did you even look at the stats?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Will the Herndon pta or any other Herndon community groups be hosting candidate forums? I didn't find anything from Google.
Unfortunately for Herndon there isn’t much organizing. Also very unfair there are very few special ed kids in Herndon because $10k to pay a doctor to get ADHD diagnosis is unaffordable to most so Herndon kids don’t have extra time to take tests, all the McLean kids get more time on tests - nobody looks out for Herndon...
Unfortunately for Herndon there isn’t much organizing. Also very unfair there are very few special ed kids in Herndon because $10k to pay a doctor to get ADHD diagnosis is unaffordable to most so Herndon kids don’t have extra time to take tests, all the McLean kids get more time on tests - nobody looks out for Herndon...
Anonymous wrote:Will the Herndon pta or any other Herndon community groups be hosting candidate forums? I didn't find anything from Google.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They don’t even own the land for a new high school so thst is a ways off unless they come up with a huge chunk of money. The root issue for those opposing the current issue of the board is not using One Fairfax as an excuse to push socioeconomic and racial diversity as a solution to the achievement gap.
Not one school district has done this successfully so to pursue it (by reviewing the boundary policy through the OF lens of equity to ensure that future boundary issues must prioritize that diversity) is social engineering to avoid hard, intractable problems. The law of averages makes the Sb look better but does not help struggling schools and struggling children
Just because you say these things does not make them true.
Anonymous wrote:They don’t even own the land for a new high school so thst is a ways off unless they come up with a huge chunk of money. The root issue for those opposing the current issue of the board is not using One Fairfax as an excuse to push socioeconomic and racial diversity as a solution to the achievement gap.
Not one school district has done this successfully so to pursue it (by reviewing the boundary policy through the OF lens of equity to ensure that future boundary issues must prioritize that diversity) is social engineering to avoid hard, intractable problems. The law of averages makes the Sb look better but does not help struggling schools and struggling children
Anonymous wrote:They don’t even own the land for a new high school so thst is a ways off unless they come up with a huge chunk of money. The root issue for those opposing the current issue of the board is not using One Fairfax as an excuse to push socioeconomic and racial diversity as a solution to the achievement gap.
Not one school district has done this successfully so to pursue it (by reviewing the boundary policy through the OF lens of equity to ensure that future boundary issues must prioritize that diversity) is social engineering to avoid hard, intractable problems. The law of averages makes the Sb look better but does not help struggling schools and struggling children
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To be fair, that’s not actually how she said it..... it was more “I’m not sure I want to hear about it for the next 10 years”..... with a little laugh. She seemed a tad condescending referring to those annoying constituents that expect to have their representatives advocate for them rather than manipulate them
Why would an at-large representative be expected to advocate for keeping kids in western Fairfax at Langley if a new high school were built?