Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We were all constantly reminded here on DCUM last year that ECNL MA division was one of the weakest divisions in the country. Has something really changed to the MA division?
The way I heard it last year almost half the MYS ECNL 05 team departed for DA. So where did MYS 05 ECNL get half a team to fill in? Coach must have had some out of club recruits in his back pocket. So that doesnt fare well for that clubs younger players, better get some extra training.
I am guessing that the dilution of competitive players in your age group is giving your team a slight advantage We all know not one single team has been attracting the 18 best of the best like in other areas. Its basically your average players vs our average players, some who are passed puberty, some who havent hit it yet. egos and traffic in the area wont ever let us have the best of the best. So keep bragging about winning MA records which is basic AF outside of a rec league.
So McLean 05 last year was terrible in a weak basic AF ECNL division? Now, after losing half their team, they are #2 in a weak basic AF ECNL division? Roger that!
I'm going with another theory on why things turned around.
Anonymous wrote:We were all constantly reminded here on DCUM last year that ECNL MA division was one of the weakest divisions in the country. Has something really changed to the MA division?
The way I heard it last year almost half the MYS ECNL 05 team departed for DA. So where did MYS 05 ECNL get half a team to fill in? Coach must have had some out of club recruits in his back pocket. So that doesnt fare well for that clubs younger players, better get some extra training.
I am guessing that the dilution of competitive players in your age group is giving your team a slight advantage We all know not one single team has been attracting the 18 best of the best like in other areas. Its basically your average players vs our average players, some who are passed puberty, some who havent hit it yet. egos and traffic in the area wont ever let us have the best of the best. So keep bragging about winning MA records which is basic AF outside of a rec league.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Your tone implies that I am pro-McLean. I am not but merely sharing facts. Your facts above are also worth considering.
Re: 05 team, it was considerably below average last year from what I have read in other post but today is the top ECNL team in the region.
It was implied a year ago that the top 05 talent went to WS VA last year.
Interesting how that worked out.
Kids went to Spirit and they obviously replaced them with better players. McLean and VDA have been trading places at 2 and 3 in the Mid Atlantic Conference. Looking at Loudoun’s scores against them, how can we assume Loudoun is going to be so bad next year? They’ve lost by a goal to both. They lost to McLean in the last minute too.
Loudoun lost to both by merely a goal??? and Mclean and VDA are bragging about being the best in the area??? Goodness that sure is some big brass ones. Loudoun who until recently was the pathway to FCV and maybe still is.
Anonymous wrote:We were all constantly reminded here on DCUM last year that ECNL MA division was one of the weakest divisions in the country. Has something really changed to the MA division?
The way I heard it last year almost half the MYS ECNL 05 team departed for DA. So where did MYS 05 ECNL get half a team to fill in? Coach must have had some out of club recruits in his back pocket. So that doesnt fare well for that clubs younger players, better get some extra training.
I am guessing that the dilution of competitive players in your age group is giving your team a slight advantage We all know not one single team has been attracting the 18 best of the best like in other areas. Its basically your average players vs our average players, some who are passed puberty, some who havent hit it yet. egos and traffic in the area wont ever let us have the best of the best. So keep bragging about winning MA records which is basic AF outside of a rec league.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Your tone implies that I am pro-McLean. I am not but merely sharing facts. Your facts above are also worth considering.
Re: 05 team, it was considerably below average last year from what I have read in other post but today is the top ECNL team in the region.
It was implied a year ago that the top 05 talent went to WS VA last year.
Interesting how that worked out.
Kids went to Spirit and they obviously replaced them with better players. McLean and VDA have been trading places at 2 and 3 in the Mid Atlantic Conference. Looking at Loudoun’s scores against them, how can we assume Loudoun is going to be so bad next year? They’ve lost by a goal to both. They lost to McLean in the last minute too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Your tone implies that I am pro-McLean. I am not but merely sharing facts. Your facts above are also worth considering.
Re: 05 team, it was considerably below average last year from what I have read in other post but today is the top ECNL team in the region.
It was implied a year ago that the top 05 talent went to WS VA last year.
Interesting how that worked out.
Kids went to Spirit and they obviously replaced them with better players. McLean and VDA have been trading places at 2 and 3 in the Mid Atlantic Conference. Looking at Loudoun’s scores against them, how can we assume Loudoun is going to be so bad next year? They’ve lost by a goal to both. They lost to McLean in the last minute too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Your tone implies that I am pro-McLean. I am not but merely sharing facts. Your facts above are also worth considering.
Re: 05 team, it was considerably below average last year from what I have read in other post but today is the top ECNL team in the region.
It was implied a year ago that the top 05 talent went to WS VA last year.
Interesting how that worked out.
Anonymous wrote:Your tone implies that I am pro-McLean. I am not but merely sharing facts. Your facts above are also worth considering.
Re: 05 team, it was considerably below average last year from what I have read in other post but today is the top ECNL team in the region.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:... has been impressive with teams winning or placing as finalists in the top divisions.
Didn't McLean's U18/19 ECNL team win the championship last year and its to[p player from that team win the ECNL player of the year?
Cool. What now?
Anonymous wrote:... has been impressive with teams winning or placing as finalists in the top divisions.
Didn't McLean's U18/19 ECNL team win the championship last year and its to[p player from that team win the ECNL player of the year?