Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:Sikh Temple in Oak Creek, Wisconsin, 2012 -- seven killed by white supremacist.

Charleston church, 2015 -- nine killed by white supremacist

Quebec City mosque, 2017 -- six killed by white supremacist.

Tree of Life Synagogue, 2018 -- eleven killed by white supremacist.

New Zealand Mosques, 2019 -- 49 killed by white supremacist.

Quite the trend.

I think we should stop calling them supremacists. They are just killers. Killers that are white. We need to stop dividing killers by race. It just feeds the divide. Killing is wrong.

You're quite right. They should pass a law making it illegal, that will surely stop this madness.

No. I just thing that these conversations just end up becoming race wars instead of focusing on murders as just human killers that need to be punished. All killing is wrong no matter the race or religion of the killer or the victim.

You're correct in that but I find it's a backlash to it almost always starts with a white comment. I'm sure some are just trolls stirring the pot, others have a server case of white guilt. Sometimes being a little pedantic is a good thing from separating segments of societies. If you notice in certain postings before this one, there is a definite lean towards all supremacists are white. I find they come in all colors, races, religions, cultures, castes and so on but by and far here, they are white.

On the separation part as a sample. The above is extremely proud that Obama did not state "radical Islamists". Fine with me then it was a group of Islamists that brought down the Twin Towers. Isis is composed of Islamists. Now with that, the propeller on top of their ball caps will start to spin and conjour up some sort of name for me, not provide any facts to dispute me and be satisfied. It's like arguing with a petulant child.

I was the original poster with the passing the law bit. Some here are so hell bent on passing a law thinking that it will be the end all solution. Exactly how many different laws do you need to say murder is forbidden and you will be at a minimum incarcerated. The other comment I gave to someone who brought up a sideways reference that the constitution pertains to muskets. Really? As again, empty headed sound bites with no facts provided. Look up a Puckel gun (It really was named after the inventor) and the year is was created. See what air-gun Lewis and Clark used. My reply was based on if we were restricted to use only what was commonly in use AT THAT TIME, we would need to go down to the village green to hear the town cryer proclaim what is news and not the electronics in use today. You simply can't cherry pick only what you as an individual considers important and ignore the whole.

Anonymous wrote:


Statement released by an Australian Senator

Fantastic.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:New Zealand??

Who cares??

It's literally on the other side of the planet. Sad - certainly. But ultimately irrelevant.

And stuff like this happens daily in Syria, Iraq, Yemen, etc. why is this news?

Exactly! Irrelevant!!! Why are people acting like it happened in the U.S.?

But I'm sure you changed your pictures for "I'm with Paris" when that happened. Or comment on things when Muslims attack people in Europe.

So who's up for arming Muslims with guns so they can protect themselves in mosques while they are praying?

I am waiting for all the 'good guy with a gun" folks to chime in.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:New Zealand??

Who cares??

It's literally on the other side of the planet. Sad - certainly. But ultimately irrelevant.

And stuff like this happens daily in Syria, Iraq, Yemen, etc. why is this news?

Exactly! Irrelevant!!! Why are people acting like it happened in the U.S.?

Apparently that even though this happened in another country, and no Americans were involved, and the perp states in his manifesto that he did not see Trump as his leader, Trump and white Americans are at fault. And Trump is supposed to leap frog the leader of NZ and take the lead of sussing out all the facts before the victims are identified and all facts are known.

“As a symbol of renewed white identity and common purpose? Sure. As a policy maker and leader? Dear god no.”


Even mass-murdering white supremacists have standards.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:New Zealand??

Who cares??

It's literally on the other side of the planet. Sad - certainly. But ultimately irrelevant.

And stuff like this happens daily in Syria, Iraq, Yemen, etc. why is this news?

Exactly! Irrelevant!!! Why are people acting like it happened in the U.S.?

Apparently that even though this happened in another country, and no Americans were involved, and the perp states in his manifesto that he did not see Trump as his leader, Trump and white Americans are at fault. And Trump is supposed to leap frog the leader of NZ and take the lead of sussing out all the facts before the victims are identified and all facts are known.

Anonymous wrote:New Zealand??

Who cares??

It's literally on the other side of the planet. Sad - certainly. But ultimately irrelevant.

And stuff like this happens daily in Syria, Iraq, Yemen, etc. why is this news?

Exactly! Irrelevant!!! Why are people acting like it happened in the U.S.?

Andrew yang predicted this.

Hours before some right winger tweeted a video of Andrew saying how some white shooter is gonna shoot up an asian church.

Lots of white pro types were railing on it.

Hours later, NZ happens

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:Sikh Temple in Oak Creek, Wisconsin, 2012 -- seven killed by white supremacist.

Charleston church, 2015 -- nine killed by white supremacist

Quebec City mosque, 2017 -- six killed by white supremacist.

Tree of Life Synagogue, 2018 -- eleven killed by white supremacist.

New Zealand Mosques, 2019 -- 49 killed by white supremacist.

Quite the trend.

I think we should stop calling them supremacists. They are just killers. Killers that are white. We need to stop dividing killers by race. It just feeds the divide. Killing is wrong.

You're quite right. They should pass a law making it illegal, that will surely stop this madness.

No. I just thing that these conversations just end up becoming race wars instead of focusing on murders as just human killers that need to be punished. All killing is wrong no matter the race or religion of the killer or the victim.

What is good for the goose is good for the gander, isn’t it? Remember all the times conservatives demanded that Obama say, “radical Islam”? That was even one of Trump’s campaign issues and he took great delight in saying it (to great cheers from the crowds). So, as they used to say, “why won’t you say ‘white supremacist’?”

This incident didn’t happen in America, nor were any Americans killed. I think Trump should let NZ and Australia governments take the lead on pronouncing such things first, maybe?

Should Trump really be “in charge” of this situation? To me, the country in which this incident took place and whose citizens were killed take precedence over Trump.

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:Sikh Temple in Oak Creek, Wisconsin, 2012 -- seven killed by white supremacist.

Charleston church, 2015 -- nine killed by white supremacist

Quebec City mosque, 2017 -- six killed by white supremacist.

Tree of Life Synagogue, 2018 -- eleven killed by white supremacist.

New Zealand Mosques, 2019 -- 49 killed by white supremacist.

Quite the trend.

I think we should stop calling them supremacists. They are just killers. Killers that are white. We need to stop dividing killers by race. It just feeds the divide. Killing is wrong.

You're quite right. They should pass a law making it illegal, that will surely stop this madness.

No. I just thing that these conversations just end up becoming race wars instead of focusing on murders as just human killers that need to be punished. All killing is wrong no matter the race or religion of the killer or the victim.

What is good for the goose is good for the gander, isn’t it? Remember all the times conservatives demanded that Obama say, “radical Islam”? That was even one of Trump’s campaign issues and he took great delight in saying it (to great cheers from the crowds). So, as they used to say, “why won’t you say ‘white supremacist’?”

Correct.


And Obama never gave in, never used the term.


So there ya go. There's the precedent.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:Sikh Temple in Oak Creek, Wisconsin, 2012 -- seven killed by white supremacist.

Charleston church, 2015 -- nine killed by white supremacist

Quebec City mosque, 2017 -- six killed by white supremacist.

Tree of Life Synagogue, 2018 -- eleven killed by white supremacist.

New Zealand Mosques, 2019 -- 49 killed by white supremacist.

Quite the trend.

I think we should stop calling them supremacists. They are just killers. Killers that are white. We need to stop dividing killers by race. It just feeds the divide. Killing is wrong.

You're quite right. They should pass a law making it illegal, that will surely stop this madness.

No. I just thing that these conversations just end up becoming race wars instead of focusing on murders as just human killers that need to be punished. All killing is wrong no matter the race or religion of the killer or the victim.

What is good for the goose is good for the gander, isn’t it? Remember all the times conservatives demanded that Obama say, “radical Islam”? That was even one of Trump’s campaign issues and he took great delight in saying it (to great cheers from the crowds). So, as they used to say, “why won’t you say ‘white supremacist’?”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:


Statement released by an Australian Senator

Wow

Read the DCUM school forum and be similarly shocked. The language is more veiled but the message is the same: immigrants ruin things.

Anonymous wrote:
NP. It's exhausting that you constantly blame violence by white supremacists on Trump or his "agenda" - which, btw, seeks to end ILLEGAL and not LEGAL immigration.

Regardless of this wacko agenda you and your fellow liberals love to peddle, Trump is not a "white supremacist/nationalist." He just isn't, and it's beyond pathetic that this is the narrative you keep trying to push. You may hate the man, and disagree with his politics - but he's not a white supremacist. And everytime you claim otherwise, you continue to lose credibilty.
>>>>>>>>>>>>

"Why are there so many people from sh:thole countries coming here?"

He also wants to and has been, severely limiting LEGAL immigration to the detriment of domestic businesses including in technology and agriculture. Your argument loses credibility if you cannot acknowledge all of the negative actions Trump is imposing on this country.

The author does not claim membership to any specific far-right group, and also denies being a Neo-Nazi. Instead, he expresses a sort of allegiance- and ideological sympathy, to several other mass shooters, including Dylann Roof and Anders Breivik. He claims to have been in contact with Breivik, and that the Norwegian mass-shooter’s manifesto was his “true inspiration”.

https://www.bellingcat.com/news/rest-of-world/2019/03/15/shitposting-inspirational-terrorism-and-the-christchurch-mosque-massacre/

Another brainwashed mouthbreather with a gun.