Anonymous wrote:And I want to hear from parents of a non-CES child, currently attending a W-feeder ES, who is accepted to either of the magnets.
Please tell me that unicorns do exist!![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else have a child who consistently scores at the top on standardized tests but did very poorly on the CogAT? Our DC (currently in a DCC CES) bombed the nonverbal and quantitative sections, and his verbal was lower too. He didn't get into either magnet. We weren't counting on his getting in, but it was disconcerting to see the scores so much lower.
DC consistently gets 97-99% on MAP-R and always 99% on MAP-M. Consistently has among highest MAP scores in CES. On CogAT, DC got (MCPS) 83%V, 94%Q, 99%Q. Rejected.
I also want to note that MAP-R scores among DC's CES for the winter were surprisingly low, and many showed little or no growth, or even went down in scores compared to the fall, according to DC's discussions with friends.
DC who is in a CES didn't have that much growth either - his fall score was lower than last year's spring score, and his winter score went back up to that spring score, no higher.
It's all mysterious to me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else have a child who consistently scores at the top on standardized tests but did very poorly on the CogAT? Our DC (currently in a DCC CES) bombed the nonverbal and quantitative sections, and his verbal was lower too. He didn't get into either magnet. We weren't counting on his getting in, but it was disconcerting to see the scores so much lower.
DC consistently gets 97-99% on MAP-R and always 99% on MAP-M. Consistently has among highest MAP scores in CES. On CogAT, DC got (MCPS) 83%V, 94%Q, 99%Q. Rejected.
I also want to note that MAP-R scores among DC's CES for the winter were surprisingly low, and many showed little or no growth, or even went down in scores compared to the fall, according to DC's discussions with friends.
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else have a child who consistently scores at the top on standardized tests but did very poorly on the CogAT? Our DC (currently in a DCC CES) bombed the nonverbal and quantitative sections, and his verbal was lower too. He didn't get into either magnet. We weren't counting on his getting in, but it was disconcerting to see the scores so much lower.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else have a child who consistently scores at the top on standardized tests but did very poorly on the CogAT? Our DC (currently in a DCC CES) bombed the nonverbal and quantitative sections, and his verbal was lower too. He didn't get into either magnet. We weren't counting on his getting in, but it was disconcerting to see the scores so much lower.
When you say he "bombed" are you talking about his national percentile or his MCPS percentile? Scores "so much lower" than what?
Because if you are talking about the MCPS percentile, remember that is comparing your son to only students in MCPS who were invited to test due to strong academic data and/or whose parents requested testing-- less than half of the current 5th grade class. So, you would expect lower percentiles when you are changing the group you are comparing against. This group already removed most of the "outliers" who would typically score in the lower quartile- percentiles are like the old bell curve- some are at the top, most in the middle and a few at the bottom- so when MCPS is only looking at what would typically be their top half, the distribution of scores is going to change.
I was talking about the MCPS percentiles. Thanks for this context - it makes more sense now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else have a child who consistently scores at the top on standardized tests but did very poorly on the CogAT? Our DC (currently in a DCC CES) bombed the nonverbal and quantitative sections, and his verbal was lower too. He didn't get into either magnet. We weren't counting on his getting in, but it was disconcerting to see the scores so much lower.
When you say he "bombed" are you talking about his national percentile or his MCPS percentile? Scores "so much lower" than what?
Because if you are talking about the MCPS percentile, remember that is comparing your son to only students in MCPS who were invited to test due to strong academic data and/or whose parents requested testing-- less than half of the current 5th grade class. So, you would expect lower percentiles when you are changing the group you are comparing against. This group already removed most of the "outliers" who would typically score in the lower quartile- percentiles are like the old bell curve- some are at the top, most in the middle and a few at the bottom- so when MCPS is only looking at what would typically be their top half, the distribution of scores is going to change.
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else have a child who consistently scores at the top on standardized tests but did very poorly on the CogAT? Our DC (currently in a DCC CES) bombed the nonverbal and quantitative sections, and his verbal was lower too. He didn't get into either magnet. We weren't counting on his getting in, but it was disconcerting to see the scores so much lower.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am sorry some folks seem to be making light of the Lee MS situation. Look up the stats, people! The PPs have every reason to be concerned.
Rent a condo/ apartment in Parkwood or in any of the many buildings that feed Ashburton. MBMS is great - strong cohort.
Definitely a viable option.
Or, see if you can use a friend's address as your kid's mailing address.
We are at a non-W school, and there are several families that do this. Most friends would be happy to let you use their address.
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else have a child who consistently scores at the top on standardized tests but did very poorly on the CogAT? Our DC (currently in a DCC CES) bombed the nonverbal and quantitative sections, and his verbal was lower too. He didn't get into either magnet. We weren't counting on his getting in, but it was disconcerting to see the scores so much lower.
Anonymous wrote:I am sorry some folks seem to be making light of the Lee MS situation. Look up the stats, people! The PPs have every reason to be concerned.
Rent a condo/ apartment in Parkwood or in any of the many buildings that feed Ashburton. MBMS is great - strong cohort.