Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MM's excessive spending on designer clothing fits the "gold-digger" profile. The Brits are wary of her high-spending ways.

And Kate wasn't? Also, you can't generalize about "the Brits." I mean, a good portion of the younger ones don't even want a monarchy.

Definitely weird and inconsistent. With the focus on really, really weird.

See what I mean about MM fans -- they insult anyone who criticizes MM by then attacking Kate. You are pathetic and dim.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Queen Rania can do whatever she wants. Meghan Markle is not supposed to borrow or pay anything less than full retail.

I don't get why people care what she pays. It seems so weird.

I understand why there are rules for her. That's different than being fascinated or horrified by her profligacy.

Yes, but I don't understand the people who are obsessed about what she pays. Especially because these are often the same people who will fight to the death about Kate's and Will's lack of work and how nobody should criticize them for not working. It's all just forms of subsidy that the British are okay with. I don't see how you can simultaneously make a fuss about whatever MM spends on clothes but then turn around and be totally fine with Will and Kate's lack of work. It seems weird and inconsistent.

Of course it is. It's a lot of black-and-white (maybe even literally) hating Meghan for her role but also being an apologetic Kate stan/supporter.

Can I just say, as an objective viewer, that the MM fans really started the DCUM feud between the MM/Kate supporters. MM fans were first to criticize Kate for being "lazy" and that MM would show Kate "how it's done." I also think that MM fans are quick to paint anyone who doesn't agree with them or who criticize MM legitimately (such as her spending) as racists. That is appalling and gets everyone's backs up.

Anonymous wrote:Why is Eugenie suddenly in the press? She is just prince Williams cousin, nothing more. He has several cousins, from his mother's side as wet

Eugenie is the one that had the extravagant August wedding modeled after Meghan's that no one showed up to.

If you meant Beatrice - she's dating a man she snatched out from under the fiance who lived with him and their newborn.

Anonymous wrote:MM's excessive spending on designer clothing fits the "gold-digger" profile. The Brits are wary of her high-spending ways.

And Kate wasn't? Also, you can't generalize about "the Brits." I mean, a good portion of the younger ones don't even want a monarchy.

Definitely weird and inconsistent. With the focus on really, really weird.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Queen Rania can do whatever she wants. Meghan Markle is not supposed to borrow or pay anything less than full retail.

I don't get why people care what she pays. It seems so weird.

I understand why there are rules for her. That's different than being fascinated or horrified by her profligacy.

Yes, but I don't understand the people who are obsessed about what she pays. Especially because these are often the same people who will fight to the death about Kate's and Will's lack of work and how nobody should criticize them for not working. It's all just forms of subsidy that the British are okay with. I don't see how you can simultaneously make a fuss about whatever MM spends on clothes but then turn around and be totally fine with Will and Kate's lack of work. It seems weird and inconsistent.

Of course it is. It's a lot of black-and-white (maybe even literally) hating Meghan for her role but also being an apologetic Kate stan/supporter.

MM's excessive spending on designer clothing fits the "gold-digger" profile. The Brits are wary of her high-spending ways.

Why is Eugenie suddenly in the press? She is just prince Williams cousin, nothing more. He has several cousins, from his mother's side as wet

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Queen Rania can do whatever she wants. Meghan Markle is not supposed to borrow or pay anything less than full retail.

I don't get why people care what she pays. It seems so weird.

I understand why there are rules for her. That's different than being fascinated or horrified by her profligacy.

Yes, but I don't understand the people who are obsessed about what she pays. Especially because these are often the same people who will fight to the death about Kate's and Will's lack of work and how nobody should criticize them for not working. It's all just forms of subsidy that the British are okay with. I don't see how you can simultaneously make a fuss about whatever MM spends on clothes but then turn around and be totally fine with Will and Kate's lack of work. It seems weird and inconsistent.

I don't have a problem with Meghan's spending on clothes just like I don't have a problem with Kate's spending. Meghan has a long history of keeping her nice clothes and shoes in good shape and wearing them over many years. I believe that will continue with her royal wardrobe. She's also being deliberate, it appears, to wear more pared-down, modern jewelry than Kate - with more high street brands in the mix. Just like Kate is more spare on her purses than Meghan. That's fine, they have different tastes.

On a side note - One of the reasons I don't credit the tiara tantrum story is that is so opposite of Meghan's jewelry aesthetic and with a large emerald tiara (I don't mean Eugenie's but one that was known about like the Vladimir tiara). Meghan would have had to have done a lot of research to have known about and requested the Greville Emerald Kokoshnik from the Queen.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Queen Rania can do whatever she wants. Meghan Markle is not supposed to borrow or pay anything less than full retail.

I don't get why people care what she pays. It seems so weird.

Once you are at that level, designers can make a name for themselves by you being photographed wearing their outfit. The picture is further used for advertising.
So some are given clothes, others lent
Like Oscars, actresses have to return gowns

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Queen Rania can do whatever she wants. Meghan Markle is not supposed to borrow or pay anything less than full retail.

I don't get why people care what she pays. It seems so weird.

I understand why there are rules for her. That's different than being fascinated or horrified by her profligacy.

Anonymous wrote:Queen Rania can do whatever she wants. Meghan Markle is not supposed to borrow or pay anything less than full retail.

I don't get why people care what she pays. It seems so weird.

Anonymous wrote:The English are very tribal.
Harry and Meghan are happy. They should just ignore.
Harry will never be king, so they have more freedom from Royal rules.
Just let go from a lot of the sillyness. There will be judged by today's generation, not the ones Elizabeth had to live up to.

But English are English. The rest of the world is tired of hearing about their royals, let the English love them if they so wish.

Americans want to hear about the British royals. Maybe you don't, but we do.

The English are very tribal.
Harry and Meghan are happy. They should just ignore.
Harry will never be king, so they have more freedom from Royal rules.
Just let go from a lot of the sillyness. There will be judged by today's generation, not the ones Elizabeth had to live up to.

But English are English. The rest of the world is tired of hearing about their royals, let the English love them if they so wish.

Queen Rania can do whatever she wants. Meghan Markle is not supposed to borrow or pay anything less than full retail.