Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am a 54 YO Mom with a just turned 8 DD. She was our miracle surprise baby after 5 rounds of IVF to get her older brother who is 11. I had her when I was 46–I often think how young I was when her brother was born! I remember the parenting class at VHC in Arlington when he was born—I think I was the youngest mom in attendance at 42!
That doesn't sound too bad but then you do the math and you'll be 64 when she graduates high school? I can't fathom it.
Exactly!
You see all the posts on this forum about "sandwich generation," and you are forcing your child into being in that spot!
So, you're saying no one who replied to the OP should have had kids? What age is the cut off in your world for having a child?
FWIW, older parents tend to be better off financially and can help their children with college and other financial hard knocks that might come their way. And people are living longer regardless of when they have kids -- most people will be sandwiched no matter when they have kids.
Exactly...I am the one who just posted than I am 59 with a 5th grader and can confidently say her college fund is fully funded to attend any out of state college. Same with my older DS. One part of me wishes I had started my family earlier, but it didn't happen that way, so I say better late than never!
Does it concern you that if she waits till the same age to have a child, you will be 98--and most likely will never meet your grandchildren?
I am at peace with the fact that I may never meet my grandchildren. That could be the case even with a younger parent who might die young of breast cancer. Life is like that...unpredictable. If I do meet my grandchildren, I will be grateful.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am a 54 YO Mom with a just turned 8 DD. She was our miracle surprise baby after 5 rounds of IVF to get her older brother who is 11. I had her when I was 46–I often think how young I was when her brother was born! I remember the parenting class at VHC in Arlington when he was born—I think I was the youngest mom in attendance at 42!
That doesn't sound too bad but then you do the math and you'll be 64 when she graduates high school? I can't fathom it.
Exactly!
You see all the posts on this forum about "sandwich generation," and you are forcing your child into being in that spot!
So, you're saying no one who replied to the OP should have had kids? What age is the cut off in your world for having a child?
FWIW, older parents tend to be better off financially and can help their children with college and other financial hard knocks that might come their way. And people are living longer regardless of when they have kids -- most people will be sandwiched no matter when they have kids.
Exactly...I am the one who just posted than I am 59 with a 5th grader and can confidently say her college fund is fully funded to attend any out of state college. Same with my older DS. One part of me wishes I had started my family earlier, but it didn't happen that way, so I say better late than never!
Does it concern you that if she waits till the same age to have a child, you will be 98--and most likely will never meet your grandchildren?
Anonymous wrote:I'm 51 and my youngest is in fifth grade. I don't sweat the small stuff. I'm a 1970s kid! I climbed 60-foot-tall trees to our fort when I was eight. I'm not going to care if my kid is four feet off the ground at age 10. It's all perspective. Other kids tell me I'm fun because I let them have an extra cookie. Live it up, kid!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am a 54 YO Mom with a just turned 8 DD. She was our miracle surprise baby after 5 rounds of IVF to get her older brother who is 11. I had her when I was 46–I often think how young I was when her brother was born! I remember the parenting class at VHC in Arlington when he was born—I think I was the youngest mom in attendance at 42!
That doesn't sound too bad but then you do the math and you'll be 64 when she graduates high school? I can't fathom it.
Exactly!
You see all the posts on this forum about "sandwich generation," and you are forcing your child into being in that spot!
So, you're saying no one who replied to the OP should have had kids? What age is the cut off in your world for having a child?
FWIW, older parents tend to be better off financially and can help their children with college and other financial hard knocks that might come their way. And people are living longer regardless of when they have kids -- most people will be sandwiched no matter when they have kids.
Exactly...I am the one who just posted than I am 59 with a 5th grader and can confidently say her college fund is fully funded to attend any out of state college. Same with my older DS. One part of me wishes I had started my family earlier, but it didn't happen that way, so I say better late than never!
Does it concern you that if she waits till the same age to have a child, you will be 98--and most likely will never meet your grandchildren?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am a 54 YO Mom with a just turned 8 DD. She was our miracle surprise baby after 5 rounds of IVF to get her older brother who is 11. I had her when I was 46–I often think how young I was when her brother was born! I remember the parenting class at VHC in Arlington when he was born—I think I was the youngest mom in attendance at 42!
That doesn't sound too bad but then you do the math and you'll be 64 when she graduates high school? I can't fathom it.
Exactly!
You see all the posts on this forum about "sandwich generation," and you are forcing your child into being in that spot!
So, you're saying no one who replied to the OP should have had kids? What age is the cut off in your world for having a child?
FWIW, older parents tend to be better off financially and can help their children with college and other financial hard knocks that might come their way. And people are living longer regardless of when they have kids -- most people will be sandwiched no matter when they have kids.
Exactly...I am the one who just posted than I am 59 with a 5th grader and can confidently say her college fund is fully funded to attend any out of state college. Same with my older DS. One part of me wishes I had started my family earlier, but it didn't happen that way, so I say better late than never!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am a 54 YO Mom with a just turned 8 DD. She was our miracle surprise baby after 5 rounds of IVF to get her older brother who is 11. I had her when I was 46–I often think how young I was when her brother was born! I remember the parenting class at VHC in Arlington when he was born—I think I was the youngest mom in attendance at 42!
That doesn't sound too bad but then you do the math and you'll be 64 when she graduates high school? I can't fathom it.
Exactly!
You see all the posts on this forum about "sandwich generation," and you are forcing your child into being in that spot!
So, you're saying no one who replied to the OP should have had kids? What age is the cut off in your world for having a child?
FWIW, older parents tend to be better off financially and can help their children with college and other financial hard knocks that might come their way. And people are living longer regardless of when they have kids -- most people will be sandwiched no matter when they have kids.
Anonymous wrote:I am early 60’s with a 6th grader.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am a 54 YO Mom with a just turned 8 DD. She was our miracle surprise baby after 5 rounds of IVF to get her older brother who is 11. I had her when I was 46–I often think how young I was when her brother was born! I remember the parenting class at VHC in Arlington when he was born—I think I was the youngest mom in attendance at 42!
That doesn't sound too bad but then you do the math and you'll be 64 when she graduates high school? I can't fathom it.
Exactly!
You see all the posts on this forum about "sandwich generation," and you are forcing your child into being in that spot!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am a 54 YO Mom with a just turned 8 DD. She was our miracle surprise baby after 5 rounds of IVF to get her older brother who is 11. I had her when I was 46–I often think how young I was when her brother was born! I remember the parenting class at VHC in Arlington when he was born—I think I was the youngest mom in attendance at 42!
That doesn't sound too bad but then you do the math and you'll be 64 when she graduates high school? I can't fathom it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I shared this thread with my husband to get his opinions. His father was 40 when husband was born and died when husband was only 32. He misses his dad tremendously and would love it if he were still around. Your kids don’t care if you “traveled, and really got well established in your career” before you decided to have them. They would prefer that you be alive.
The “old parent” movement is just wrong. You people spend thousands and thousands on fertility treatments, drop the kids at daycare, pat yourself on the back for “having it all”, then drop dead when your kids are in their 20s.
Rant over.
You don't know when you are going to 'drop dead'!
I was a youngish parent (21) and had a later life dd (at 43, she's 4 now). One of my younger parent friends, a dad at 23, had a sudden heart attack at 40 and died. You just don't know. Life is always a risk.
My fil had a son in his 40's (he had remarried). I came into the family around this time and people talked about it, saying stuff like oh he won't live to see him grow up, ect. Well, son just married and FIL was there of course, and just last week helped us put up a fence in our backyard. People can say whatever they want but no one knows when they will go.