Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“Women should speak up” is what you’ll tell your daughter? Disgusting. How about “we will support you, in the highly likely event you’re assaulted, even if you were breaking the rules and drinking or using drugs”? How about “I will be there for you, or your friend, not with judgment but support, and we will figure out if you want to speak up or not together”?
When I was raped in college, those are things that might have lead to me telling my mom. Instead she still doesn’t know today. Because she’s like you PP. Blames women for not wanting to tear their lives apart.
I'm upset that PP jumped on you after you posted such personal and painful information. I hope you find peace.
+1 If that poster is an example of Holton parents... no thanks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“Women should speak up” is what you’ll tell your daughter? Disgusting. How about “we will support you, in the highly likely event you’re assaulted, even if you were breaking the rules and drinking or using drugs”? How about “I will be there for you, or your friend, not with judgment but support, and we will figure out if you want to speak up or not together”?
When I was raped in college, those are things that might have lead to me telling my mom. Instead she still doesn’t know today. Because she’s like you PP. Blames women for not wanting to tear their lives apart.
I'm upset that PP jumped on you after you posted such personal and painful information. I hope you find peace.
Anonymous wrote:“Women should speak up” is what you’ll tell your daughter? Disgusting. How about “we will support you, in the highly likely event you’re assaulted, even if you were breaking the rules and drinking or using drugs”? How about “I will be there for you, or your friend, not with judgment but support, and we will figure out if you want to speak up or not together”?
When I was raped in college, those are things that might have lead to me telling my mom. Instead she still doesn’t know today. Because she’s like you PP. Blames women for not wanting to tear their lives apart.
Anonymous wrote:“Women should speak up” is what you’ll tell your daughter? Disgusting.[b]How about “we will support you, in the highly likely event you’re assaulted, even if you were breaking the rules and drinking or using drugs”? How about “I will be there for you, or your friend, not with judgment but support, and we will figure out if you want to speak up or not together”?
When I was raped in college, those are things that might have lead to me telling my mom. Instead she still doesn’t know today. Because she’s like you PP. Blames women for not wanting to tear their lives apart.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just to get back to the original question for a minute:
My guess is that the numbers of applicants to Prep and Holton won't change, but the political leanings of the applicants will.
I know the parents of three girls at Holton whose daughters are happy there now but who are very unhappy with the school's current "believe ALL women!" push which is facially pro-woman but they see as is just liberal bias. I think many fewer Catholics will apply to Holton this year.
[i]
As for Prep, it is the poster child for conservative male entitlement right now, and as such I think many liberal parents will not want their liberal friends to see that "GP" sticker on their Prius.
I don't think other area schools will be affected at all. The commenters above who do seem to be doing so out of wishful thinking against a school or group of schools that they personally dislike.
Really? So, Hilton parents aren’t ‘pro female’ ? No thanks!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Prep had a record turnout at this year’s open house and expects record applicant pool. I guess there really is no such thing as bad publicity. After all, how many schools can claim two sitting SCOTUS justices and Federal Reserve Chair at the same time.
Hate to break it to you, but none of the private schools in Washington, D.C. are hard to get into (assuming you can afford the tuition). Relatively few people apply (though the application numbers are inflated by the same students applying to multiple schools) and the schools need to fill the seats, so all of them have high acceptance rates (though they don't advertise that).
Oh how I wish this were true!!Anonymous wrote:Prep had a record turnout at this year’s open house and expects record applicant pool. I guess there really is no such thing as bad publicity. After all, how many schools can claim two sitting SCOTUS justices and Federal Reserve Chair at the same time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Since the Kavanaugh confirmation hearing, traffic on Prep’s online store increased 7,000 percent—that’s right, 7,000. They expect their largest attendance ever at this year’s open house. After all, how many schools can boast two sitting SCOTUS justices along current Federal Reserve Chair, along with NFL and MLB executives, countless government/business/military leaders, Medal of Honor, Emmy Award, Pulitzer Prize and Olympic gold medal recipients, and the creator of modern chemotherapy?
![]()
You have learned nothing from this ordeal. Nothing.
We learned that Prep has produced plenty of successful graduates.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Prep had a record turnout at this year’s open house and expects record applicant pool. I guess there really is no such thing as bad publicity. After all, how many schools can claim two sitting SCOTUS justices and Federal Reserve Chair at the same time.
Hate to break it to you, but none of the private schools in Washington, D.C. are hard to get into (assuming you can afford the tuition). Relatively few people apply (though the application numbers are inflated by the same students applying to multiple schools) and the schools need to fill the seats, so all of them have high acceptance rates (though they don't advertise that).
Anonymous wrote:Prep had a record turnout at this year’s open house and expects record applicant pool. I guess there really is no such thing as bad publicity. After all, how many schools can claim two sitting SCOTUS justices and Federal Reserve Chair at the same time.