Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP. Your issues large stem from conversational differences that set you guys up behind the eight ball before you even start a discussion. You have different ways of communicating and you have to learn to compromise and speak in ways that will make your partner more receptive to what you have to say.
I hope you are right. That is, I hope the problems arise from conversational differences. If so, I think we can solve our problems.
I wonder, though, if for some issues my wife simply can't reason her way through. She sometimes leaps from A to Z, and I'm unable to trace the thought process that falls in the middle. When I ask "can you explain why you feel that way?" she is sometimes unable. She can't explain how or why she reached her own conclusions. There have been odd lapses in judgment now and then which suggests that no real thinking is taking place ... kind of like a teenager who doesn't look before they leap. This makes me nervous, because when a parent is responsible for a child's life, the parent MUST look before they leap.
Anonymous wrote:OP. Your issues large stem from conversational differences that set you guys up behind the eight ball before you even start a discussion. You have different ways of communicating and you have to learn to compromise and speak in ways that will make your partner more receptive to what you have to say.
Anonymous wrote:OP. Your issues large stem from conversational differences that set you guys up behind the eight ball before you even start a discussion. You have different ways of communicating and you have to learn to compromise and speak in ways that will make your partner more receptive to what you have to say.
Short term: You need to start discussions long before they get to a bottleneck or boiling point. For the furniture, you need to discuss "can we each do a little research, get some ideas and then compare what we've picked. If we can't agree, we can discuss what we want and what we don't and then we can look for alternatives." In your example, she went into the research thinking she would find some alternatives. She put a lot of work into the selection and then you shot it down without any alternatives. It says that her work wasn't appreciated, her choice was criticized and you aren't offering to help, just making her do more work. So, before she gets to the point of making a suggestion and suggesting looking for alternatives, suggest a process to her that includes you each doing work, each providing ideas and then discussing options and alternatives. You felt like you were being open, but from her perspective, you were not.
For the driving, again you need to change the framework. After she started to drive, having some compassion that driving in a new country was a good start, but you should have focused on suggesting that she needs some more practice time driving rather than focusing on her driving with the children. Rather than being constructive and suggesting that she needs more practice, you immediately went to "you're endangering our children and I have to step in to stop you." Imagine if you took your children to the playground and wanted to let your child explore the jungle gym without standing below them. Your wife swoops in and says that you are endangering your child, that they could fall and break a limb or worse, their neck, and that she doesn't want you taking the children to the playground without her until she can trust you. Essentially in both cases, one parent is unilaterally saying that they don't trust the other parents' judgment and that they don't care for the safety of the children. Not good messages that will ever be received well.
Long term: You should get one of Deborah Tannen's Books "That's Not What I Meant!" or "You Just Don't Understand". She's written many good books on communication but these are a really good place to start. As a friend who is a professional linguist once said to me, these are Linguistics 101 for learning how to understand and communicate better. She frames them in the ways that men and woman are often taught to communicate. In your case, I think the basics to linguistics and learning to read your partner's communication style would be helpful. People have to understand that communication is half communicating the right message and half receiving the right message. If your conversation partner is not receiving the right message, then you need to adjust your communication methods to make sure that the right message is received. My wife and I were mostly on track when we first met, but we still had some miscommunication. This book definitely helped us learn how to communicate to each other better. It wasn't so much what we were saying, but how we were saying it. And techniques in the book helped us learn to read each other better and learn to communicate more in the manner which the partner would understand. 19 years later, we are still much better at framing messages to each other than we were. I frame things differently now when I speak to my wife vs speaking with others because I know how she'll receive my message better. She does the same.
https://www.amazon.com/You-Just-Dont-Understand-Conversation/dp/0060959622/ref=asap_bc?ie=UTF8
https://www.amazon.com/Thats-What-Meant-Conversational-Relationships/dp/0062062999/ref=asap_bc?ie=UTF8
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Advice is the same regardless of gender. Some people are persnickety, perfectionist. It drives people around them crazy.
The lady with the cheese plate example a few post back was exactly like OP. Sometimes it's better to just let things go. My spouse is doing our 4th of July event. The OP would probably want to discuss menu and all the things his wife should buy. I personally want to do it to my spouse as indont enjoy generic hot dog buns. But if I went to the store and 2 d guessed all his selections and was critical of his menu he would likely ask why am I doing this. Indont blame him. Ok, you need to look internally.
OP here. No, I wouldn't give a damn about cheese plates, or any of the many tiny decisions that are made on a daily basis.
I'm taking about big issues here ... the sorts of issues that arise just once in a while, rather than on a daily basis.
Another example -- discussing how best to take care of an aging parent. It would be nice to be able to chat about a major issue like this, but I find that my wife is on a knife's edge within 60 seconds of starting the conversation. If I suggest that we first get a sense of the range of options and choices we have available, she will interpret that to mean that I want to challenge her decision. In other words -- we can't talk about big issues. I mean we can't even get the conversation started. No, I don't yell. No, I don't tell her what to do. No, I don't tell her it is my way or the highway. None of these things. I lay out my thoughts on a conversational tone. But this approach doesn't work. It is almost as if she is opposed to reason itself -- that the mere act of THINKING before making an important choice is a challenge to her approach to decision-making.
Anonymous wrote:Advice is the same regardless of gender. Some people are persnickety, perfectionist. It drives people around them crazy.
The lady with the cheese plate example a few post back was exactly like OP. Sometimes it's better to just let things go. My spouse is doing our 4th of July event. The OP would probably want to discuss menu and all the things his wife should buy. I personally want to do it to my spouse as indont enjoy generic hot dog buns. But if I went to the store and 2 d guessed all his selections and was critical of his menu he would likely ask why am I doing this. Indont blame him. Ok, you need to look internally.
Anonymous wrote:The way you write it sure sounds like she's overreacting, but ask yourself whether you are frequently critical. Sometimes it's not that you didn't like the chair she picked, it's that you criticized the last 17 things she's suggested or done, and this is just the last straw. Or that you frequently criticize without offering alternatives (so that "let's consider alternatives" really means "you go find some more options for me to consider") so she's making all the suggestions and you're just shooting them down, rather than you offering alternatives.
Also consider your tone. You might think that the words you are saying are totally reasonable, but your tone might be coming across as condescending, abrupt, sharp, etc.
And the driving thing makes it sound like you don't really trust her judgment, and that vibe gets old fast, too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My wife recently asked me if I liked a particular piece of furniture she is considering. I wasn't fond of it and asked her if we could consider alternatives. Instead of exploring alternatives, she stopped looking altogether, and told me that I can just pick what I want, since "you don't like my choices". Well, that kind of spoils the fun of looking for furniture if we can't do it together.
Another example ... my wife didn't drive for many years, before we met. She lived downtown and simply didn't need a car. Recently, however, she started to drive again. Because her driving skills were rusty, I asked her to drive solo for a few weeks, without our kids in the car, in order to get the hang of it again. I should also add that she had never driven in the USA before (she is from another country). I didn't want our kids at risk while she went through the learning process. But after acclimating to USA roads, she told me she never wants to drive with the kids in the car, in order to avoid causing a fight with me.
There are countless similar examples. It is so damn frustrating. Her attitude makes it impossible for us to have any discussion unless our opinions align precisely.
Has anybody been in this situation? Did you find a remedy? If so, please share your approach.
I'm one of the pp's who gets where your wife is coming from. Just saying "I'm not fond of it" is useless information to her. You've rejected her choice, but given her no feedback to work with in looking at other things. You could have asked her what she liked about it. You could have figured out what elements of the furniture you did like, and what elements of the furniture you didn't like. How did you feel about the color? The style? The price? Having her do all the legwork, and then you simply accepting or dismissing her choices without explanation does not count as "doing it together". It's making her do all the work, and you are acting like the final decision maker. I totally get why she shut down after that.
Anonymous wrote:This discussion is no different than habing a husband eho complaind about your cooking.
The OP would argue that they should sit down and discuss recipes and ingredients and salting food to taste. All about what she should be doing.
The wife would say then you cook dinner ornim not cooking.
Then he would call her immature for disengaging.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't buy it either.
You probably felt you were gentle but you were being condescending and argumentative. You probably harped on and on about driving mistakes and she exploded and responded I'm never driving them again.
In the end, if she is a bad driver she shouldn't be driving the kids around. Great if she never drives them again
OP here. She was a bad driver because she hadn't driven in 10 years, and hadn't driven in the USA. Now she is much improved. It would make life easier for her if she drove now, but she seems hell-bent on playing the role of the martyr.
When I raised the driving issue initially, I began by explaining that I am uncomfortable driving in any new country. It takes me a while to acclimate, and it isn't wise to go through the acclimation process with kids in the car. I explained this using ME as the example. I then generalized, and said that I would hope that she would want some solo practice before driving with the kids.
I don't think I was condescending. Rather, I was careful and polite, because I knew, from experience, that I was walking on eggshells. And sure enough, those shells cracked. I'm not sure how to magically walk across those shells without breaking them. A two-ounce mouse could crack them.