Anonymous wrote:Sounds like Dr Dahlgren is not the most ethical person and might just be saying things to make parents feel better.
Anonymous wrote:Sounds like Dr Dahlgren is not the most ethical person and might just be saying things to make parents feel better.
Anonymous wrote:Sounds like Dr Dahlgren is not the most ethical person and might just be saying things to make parents feel better.[/quote
I don't like knocking other professionals but it might be the choice of tester. If you scroll back through these forums and look at the scores linked with this doctors name they seem interesting.
Most psychologists see a rough equivalent of the bell curve regarding test scores. In this area you do see more 115-125 FSIQ scores but not the 135-150 I see posted on this board. Certainly not enough to represent the amount of children in the differentiated services in the various public and private schools.
As a tester you have a small amount of lee way when recording and interpreting answers. You certainly can frame things in your clinical interpretation. If FCPS sees a large amount of children coming with inflated scores from one tester over the years...well it will make them pause.
GMU put out two interesting studies (you can use Google scholar to look them up) about children brought in by their parents for WISC testing for the AAP program the average IQ was in the 120s for both studies.
Anonymous wrote:She said the same reason FCPS is reducing the number of students from private school and we might go through similar issue if we apply from private school next year too
Anonymous wrote:
Nope. They are only required to have a program with procedures for referring and identifying. Test scores alone are not enough. Based on the work samples OP said she provided, I’m not convinced he qualifies or needs it.
http://www.doe.virginia.gov/instruction/gifted_ed/faq.shtml
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am the other poster who is in a similar situation as op. I also emailed Oscar but have not heard back yet. However, I know that I am not the only one in this situation. We had done our wisc with Delgrahn, as someone on this forum had suggested. She was shocked that we didn't get in first round, but she also said that FCPS do limit based on which school you apply as she use to be on the committee for aap. She noted that is the reason they as you on the original application your home ES. At this point I plan on staying in private school for now and feel blessed to have that option, but dontb think it's right for so many people who don't have that option and have extremely high scores.
Isn't this information confidential?
Anonymous wrote:Op here
I don’t think PP is trolling
We too did Wisc with Dr.Dahlgren and 2 of my sons classmates did.
One of them got selected in appeal
She said the same reason FCPS is reducing the number of students from private school and we might go through similar issue if we apply from private school next year too
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We had done our wisc with Delgrahn, as someone on this forum had suggested. She was shocked that we didn't get in first round, but she also said that FCPS do limit based on which school you apply as she use to be on the committee for aap.
If Delgrahn [sic] stated what you posted here, she is wrong. FCPS does not limit AAP placement based on which school you apply to/from.
(Personally, I think you misheard Dr. Dahlgren.)
~a former member of GTAC/AAPAC
Anonymous wrote:We had done our wisc with Delgrahn, as someone on this forum had suggested. She was shocked that we didn't get in first round, but she also said that FCPS do limit based on which school you apply as she use to be on the committee for aap.
Anonymous wrote:I am the other poster who is in a similar situation as op. I also emailed Oscar but have not heard back yet. However, I know that I am not the only one in this situation. We had done our wisc with Delgrahn, as someone on this forum had suggested. She was shocked that we didn't get in first round, but she also said that FCPS do limit based on which school you apply as she use to be on the committee for aap. She noted that is the reason they as you on the original application your home ES. At this point I plan on staying in private school for now and feel blessed to have that option, but dontb think it's right for so many people who don't have that option and have extremely high scores.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t get this
AAP is a generic program that is offered for all fc residents if found gifted
Isn’t it against law or discrimination if they select differently if they come from private schools?
Nope. They are only required to have a program with procedures for referring and identifying. Test scores alone are not enough. Based on the work samples OP said she provided, I’m not convinced he qualifies or needs it.
http://www.doe.virginia.gov/instruction/gifted_ed/faq.shtml
work samples or a lack thereof should not trump a high WISC. You're basically saying ignore the CogAT, NNAT, WISC and GBRS because this parent may not have selected wisely in submitting work samples? That's what's wrong with this process, it's completely arbitrary. Anonymous wrote:I don’t get this
AAP is a generic program that is offered for all fc residents if found gifted
Isn’t it against law or discrimination if they select differently if they come from private schools?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The story of these two kids looks like Advanced Trolling. 8 pages of responses so far.
+1, wish this forum forces sign-in so that only quality/informational threads are posted!