Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's has nothing to do with "deserving". It's time the able bodied pick themselves up.

Can't subsidize them forever, even though you would like that to happen.

Intergenerational welfare has to stop.

Then why are you bitching about shoes?

That was ME talking about poor people wasting money on $200 shoes....not the PP you're replying to. Why do liberals always assume they are talking to ONE conservative? Can't you tell the difference in writing style and content? Jeez.

You mean there is more than one f-ing idiot dotard?

You dotards all want to punish people for their sins - being poor, getting pregnant, etc.

The funny thing? People learn and grow through their mistakes. By providing cradle to grave handouts, you are actually keeping people poor and pregnant for generations.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Jfc, you assholes are so purposely deceitful. You damn well know the poor pay taxes: excise, property, payroll, and sales taxes.


Again, how do you wring blood out of a stone?

Don't give me that poor crap. Close to half the country is not contributing to the revenue base and that's economically unsustainable. Stop pleading poor at every discussion on just how far out of whack the numbers have become.

+ 1 We are now in a spot where half the people are "too poor" to contribute to the federal revenue base and liberals don't see a problem with that? Sorry, but if a poor person can afford to buy a $200 pair of sneakers, he can pay $100 to the government instead and "sacrifice" with a $100 pair.

Oh good grief. Where are you seeing all these poor people purchasing $200 sneakers and why are you so obsessed with them? I don’t know any poor people who pay anywhere close to that for sneakers. I do, in fact, see some poor people wearing nice sneakers. Here’s a newsflash for you - some people are generous and caring and help provide nice shoes for the poor and homeless! There are charities dedicated to this. My father and husband have both given homeless men the shoes off their feet. My daughter gave a homeless child her very nice new teddy bear. I could go on and on.

Also, many poor people are really great at shopping garage sales. I sell all the name brand clothing and shoes that my kids have outgrown at my garage sales every year. The clothes and shoes still look brand new. But these folks are buying them for $1! Maybe $4 or $5 for the nicest shoes.

My point is that just because you saw a poor person wearing something expensive doesn’t give you the right to assume they paid more than they could afford for those items.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well I had the experiences today of people talking about the tax bill. Happy guys all around. Will pay less.

More money in paycheck.

Boris - you need to refine your English grammar and syntax. No Christmas bonus for you!

This. Either the have been fewer trolls lately or they've gotten really good, but "more money in paycheck"? Lol, da!

Boris is on to something that you missed. More money will be in the paycheck because less tax will be withheld. How does it feel to be bested by a Russian bot? Must be as galling as watching the most qualified white girl on the planet lose a presidential election to a reality TV host.

You mean Dotard, who even treasoning with the damn useless Russians earned 3 million fewer votes? Oh my I am bested! By someone who doesn't understand the difference between payroll taxes and income taxes? Oh but I am BESTED!!

I dunno. Boris the bot knows that "treasoning" is not a word and that both reductions in payroll taxes paid by an employee and federal income taxes mean more money in a paycheck

Besting is so easy with those projecting their mental limitations onto others.

Again, terribly galling for your sort. L

Hey bot! You didn’t finish your sentence.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well I had the experiences today of people talking about the tax bill. Happy guys all around. Will pay less.

More money in paycheck.

Boris - you need to refine your English grammar and syntax. No Christmas bonus for you!

This. Either the have been fewer trolls lately or they've gotten really good, but "more money in paycheck"? Lol, da!

Boris is on to something that you missed. More money will be in the paycheck because less tax will be withheld. How does it feel to be bested by a Russian bot? Must be as galling as watching the most qualified white girl on the planet lose a presidential election to a reality TV host.

You mean Dotard, who even treasoning with the damn useless Russians earned 3 million fewer votes? Oh my I am bested! By someone who doesn't understand the difference between payroll taxes and income taxes? Oh but I am BESTED!!

I dunno. Boris the bot knows that "treasoning" is not a word and that both reductions in payroll taxes paid by an employee and federal income taxes mean more money in a paycheck

Besting is so easy with those projecting their mental limitations onto others.

Again, terribly galling for your sort. L

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well I had the experiences today of people talking about the tax bill. Happy guys all around. Will pay less.

More money in paycheck.

Boris - you need to refine your English grammar and syntax. No Christmas bonus for you!

This. Either the have been fewer trolls lately or they've gotten really good, but "more money in paycheck"? Lol, da!

Boris is on to something that you missed. More money will be in the paycheck because less tax will be withheld. How does it feel to be bested by a Russian bot? Must be as galling as watching the most qualified white girl on the planet lose a presidential election to a reality TV host.

You mean Dotard, who even treasoning with the damn useless Russians earned 3 million fewer votes? Oh my I am bested! By someone who doesn't understand the difference between payroll taxes and income taxes? Oh but I am BESTED!!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well I had the experiences today of people talking about the tax bill. Happy guys all around. Will pay less.

More money in paycheck.

Boris - you need to refine your English grammar and syntax. No Christmas bonus for you!

This. Either the have been fewer trolls lately or they've gotten really good, but "more money in paycheck"? Lol, da!

Boris is on to something that you missed. More money will be in the paycheck because less tax will be withheld. How does it feel to be bested by a Russian bot? Must be as galling as watching the most qualified white girl on the planet lose a presidential election to a reality TV host.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see plenty of white dudes with $200 sneakers bopping around in shiny jeeps, etc., that their daddies bought for them. What is the racist's obsession with black people and their shoes? So weird.

Nobody ever mentioned race. Why are you turning this into a race thing? Just so you can scream racist, as usual?

And....dimwit....if someone is bopping around in expensive shoes their daddies bought them, fine! We are talking about people on the government dole spending that kind of money.

Liberals are going insane trying to defend this. Why would you give as an example the fact that some kid gets his shoes paid for him by his father as justification for welfare dependents wasting taxpayer money on luxury items? Are you saying that in Liberal LaLa Land, a poor person dependent on taxpayers is as ENTITLED to expensive stuff as self-supporting people?

O....M.....G!

We all hear your dog whistle when you start talking about "poor people wearing expensive sneakers"--gmafb

You mean that poor black people buy expensive sneakers? Is that the dig whistle? Jesus what a cliche you are PP. with your stupid dog whistles.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well I had the experiences today of people talking about the tax bill. Happy guys all around. Will pay less.

More money in paycheck.

Boris - you need to refine your English grammar and syntax. No Christmas bonus for you!

This. Either the have been fewer trolls lately or they've gotten really good, but "more money in paycheck"? Lol, da!

All this winning is awesome!!!

Anonymous wrote:Well I had the experiences today of people talking about the tax bill. Happy guys all around. Will pay less.

More money in paycheck.

Boris - you need to refine your English grammar and syntax. No Christmas bonus for you!

Anonymous wrote:Bannon here on this thread spewing his alcohol-fueled, addle-brained trumpenomics.

I've been thinking this for the past few weeks or so.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The GOP is passing bills that the majority of voters don’t support. Who do they represent exactly?!

Corporations

And the uber rich like Trump and his swamp filled administration.

Well I had the experiences today of people talking about the tax bill. Happy guys all around. Will pay less.

More money in paycheck.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I fully expect violence against the economic and/or political elite within the next two years. Don't be surprised we start hearing about the murders of corporate execs, finance types, and lobbyist swamp creatures. It's only a matter of time - it hasn't happened in the US since the 1960s but we are quickly headed that way.

Read about the Lead Years in Italy in the 1970s...very scary times ahead:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Years_of_Lead_(Italy)

Libs and democrats have already demonstrated many times that they recquite capable of political violence, so I'd say we're already past the stage you predict happening.

What in the hell spdo you call the democrat guy shooting up the republican baseball team, if not political violence?

Hilarious! You selectively ignore all the other Republican violence, like Charlottesville.

Anonymous wrote:The GOP is passing bills that the majority of voters don’t support. Who do they represent exactly?!

Corporations