Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm going to express my frustration by never spending a $ in OC!
It's gross there anyways.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Teachers have the week between Christmas and New Years and the week of Spring break to have professional in service days in addition to summer. There are 261 non-weekend days in a year. Most of us get 10 federal holidays a year and do not get a week off at Christmas and a week off in March. Accounting for the 9 federal holidays (July 4 is not in teh school year), that leaves 252 weekdays a year. Take off 180 days for school and there are still 71 week days. The teachers can have their professional days on those 71 week days. That's typically 5 days at Christmas, 5 days for Spring break and 61 days spread across the summer. They need to handle their in-service days on those days. And if the issue is the pay, then the union needs to negotiate an appropriate payment level to compensate the teachers. However, that is a discussion outside the scheduling of the school year. There are 185 days between 4 Sep 2018 and 14 Jun 2019 that are not any of the federal holidays, the week between Christmas and New Year and one week for spring break. There should not be a problem fitting in 180 days of school. There's even some leeway if you need snow days (up to 5).
False, according to the following MCPS e-mail snippet:
Next year, we will have even fewer days to work with than in years past to accommodate our instructional traditions, such as having 184 instructional days, and our non-instructional traditions, such as a full week for Spring Break. As we design next year’s calendar, we start with several requirements from the State:
September 4–June 14: the permissible time frame for instruction
180: the minimum number of instructional days required
15: the number of State mandated days that schools must be closed
3: the number of snow make-up days required at the end of the year (before June 14)
Once the calendar accounts for these State required elements, a total of six days remain that can be programmed for other, non-required educational or operational priorities, such as Spring Break or instructional days above the state minimum of 180. How to allocate these days among our multiple calendar priorities is our challenge.
QED. You have been defeated.
I beg to differ. Here's the 2018-2019 calendar with notes
This includes 15 days off (Columbus Day, 2 Thanksgiving days, 7 days for Christmas/New Years, MLK day, President's day, 2 days for Easter, Memorial Day).
There are 184 possible days of instruction including 4 days at the end of the school year to handle snow days without compromising holidays.
What the school district doesn't want to do it give up teacher paid days without students. However, while you need to have a winter break and spring break for students, employees aren't required to get those breaks. Take a teacher in-service day the week between Christmas and New Years and another one during the Spring break week. They can take one or more days the week before school opens.
2 Days off for Easter? but it's actually 6, and you said 5. I am confused.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Teachers have the week between Christmas and New Years and the week of Spring break to have professional in service days in addition to summer. There are 261 non-weekend days in a year. Most of us get 10 federal holidays a year and do not get a week off at Christmas and a week off in March. Accounting for the 9 federal holidays (July 4 is not in teh school year), that leaves 252 weekdays a year. Take off 180 days for school and there are still 71 week days. The teachers can have their professional days on those 71 week days. That's typically 5 days at Christmas, 5 days for Spring break and 61 days spread across the summer. They need to handle their in-service days on those days. And if the issue is the pay, then the union needs to negotiate an appropriate payment level to compensate the teachers. However, that is a discussion outside the scheduling of the school year. There are 185 days between 4 Sep 2018 and 14 Jun 2019 that are not any of the federal holidays, the week between Christmas and New Year and one week for spring break. There should not be a problem fitting in 180 days of school. There's even some leeway if you need snow days (up to 5).
False, according to the following MCPS e-mail snippet:
Next year, we will have even fewer days to work with than in years past to accommodate our instructional traditions, such as having 184 instructional days, and our non-instructional traditions, such as a full week for Spring Break. As we design next year’s calendar, we start with several requirements from the State:
September 4–June 14: the permissible time frame for instruction
180: the minimum number of instructional days required
15: the number of State mandated days that schools must be closed
3: the number of snow make-up days required at the end of the year (before June 14)
Once the calendar accounts for these State required elements, a total of six days remain that can be programmed for other, non-required educational or operational priorities, such as Spring Break or instructional days above the state minimum of 180. How to allocate these days among our multiple calendar priorities is our challenge.
QED. You have been defeated.
I beg to differ. Here's the 2018-2019 calendar with notes
This includes 15 days off (Columbus Day, 2 Thanksgiving days, 7 days for Christmas/New Years, MLK day, President's day, 2 days for Easter, Memorial Day).
There are 184 possible days of instruction including 4 days at the end of the school year to handle snow days without compromising holidays.
What the school district doesn't want to do it give up teacher paid days without students. However, while you need to have a winter break and spring break for students, employees aren't required to get those breaks. Take a teacher in-service day the week between Christmas and New Years and another one during the Spring break week. They can take one or more days the week before school opens.
Anonymous wrote:I'm going to express my frustration by never spending a $ in OC!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Not only political but the BOE is making it seem like you either have to be for Jewish holidays or for Spring Break. But then again, I think that was their point to start the complaints.
You’re right.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MCPS is already proposing a schedule option with no professional days during the school year. So I don't understand why you keep saying that the professional days are the problem.
Also, are you seriously proposing putting professional days during Christmas and New Year's? Is that when your office holds training sessions?
No, professional days can be the week before school starts. However, others are also saying that the teachers need days for grading, for cleaning their rooms, and for additional non-student activities that are non-training days. Teachers can take a day during the week between Christmas and New Year's (not on the actual days) or Spring Break if they need additional non-student days for such activities.
Anonymous wrote:MCPS is already proposing a schedule option with no professional days during the school year. So I don't understand why you keep saying that the professional days are the problem.
Also, are you seriously proposing putting professional days during Christmas and New Year's? Is that when your office holds training sessions?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Doesn't seem that crazy. In NY, we started school the Wednesday after labor day and then finished in late June (22 or 23 ish) and that included a week off in February for 'mid-winter recess'. Since they don't have that down here, it doesn't seem crazy.
Also the case where I went to school in NJ. They were still able to fit in the -80 Days.
OK, then you propose a calendar. MCPS gave you all of the information you need for it.
I wasn’t saying that I want to propose a calendar. I was just pointing out that other districts/states make this work.
First of all, it’s the BOE’s job to do that. They’ve been able to do it for years and should be able to make it work this time, without sending out a whiny email complaining about the new ‘challenge’ due to Hogan.
Several people have given examples of possibilities and the BOE has given it’s own options. Pick one and go with it.
What’s the point of an email like the one they sent out other than to make it political.
Not only political but the BOE is making it seem like you either have to be for Jewish holidays or for Spring Break. But then again, I think that was their point to start the complaints.
Anonymous wrote: If Anthony Brown had won and this was his calendar proposal everybody would be singing his praises and about how he cares about Maryland small businesses in Ocean City etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What calendar are you looking at? There's no day off for Columbus Day.
I tossed that in looking for a 15th state-mandated closure date. The 2016 public school calendar only had 12 required closure dates. Not sure where they get 15 state-mandated closure date. Substitute Columbus Day for whatever the 15th mandated closure date that MCPS is using.
Consider finding that out first?
Anonymous wrote:
Howard County last day June 14th
Frederick County last day June 15th
PG County last day June 15th
Baltimore County last day June 15th
Anne Arundel County last day June 15th
Baltimore City last day June 14th
Don't feel like looking any more up. I would assume most of the others don't have Jewish or Muslim holidays for days off and may get out a little earlier.