Anonymous wrote:Carrie and Big defined the 2000s and contributed greatly to the erosion of dating, marriage, and American values.
1) A chauffeured loner is supposed to be a "cool finance guy." He's not. He's an uncharismatic dork doing a Gordon Gekko impression.
2) A middle aged shrew advice columnist nobody reads is the "hot girl." She's not.
3) Their on-again/off-again sometimes f buddies, sometimes just phone pals crap is mockery of family values. It was the vangard for gen-x and millennial quasi-polyamorous floating listlessly through life.
4) They're not funny. Think of the funniest thing either one of them did. Can you think of *anything*? Even throw in Charlotte and Sam. In retrospect, I'm struggling to think of one time the cast made me smirk. It later evolved to, we're all just watching for the...hideous fashion and to see if Big will ever marry the shrew?
5) After breaking women's brains with SATC, they salted the earth with a few movies and now this senior citizen 'just like that' streaming series. "Just do whatever, girl bosses focus on career and shoes and vodka cocktails, family can wait, we're so fun, quirky and hard to please hehe"...how is this aspirational again?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She was too complicated for him. He married Natasha because he wanted simple, uncomplicated arm candy. See the last episode of season 2.
I think that is the explanation that makes the most sense but what I am wondering is, what is so dang complicated about her that he keeps running from? She doesn't seem complicated to me. In the early seasons, her main interests were Big, her girlfriends, fashion, going out, and writing her column. She wasn't even that into her career (they make her more into a "career woman" after she starts writing her first book).
And he later decides he's all in just because she left NY for Paris?
It's very confusing and sends a mixed message to female viewers.
Anonymous wrote:The part where he leaves her at the altar in the first movie is a bridge too far for me. After all their breakups and reunions and the growth he shows over 6 seasons, I don't think he would do that. Yes he might get scared and freaked out but you don't leave someone at the altar in front of ~ 300 guests. Decent people just don't do that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:lAnonymous wrote:I love this thread. What else about SATC can we talk about? Not the movies.
Trey is getting a bad rap in this thread for being stiff and boring but so was Charlotte. They were equally matched IMO.
Speaking of those 2, something that always bugged me was him giving her the apartment in the divorce. That was prime real estate and had been in his family for generations - and he gives her the house, where she moves her new husband in and has a family there.
Trey and Charlotte couldn't have been married more than 15 months and that includes a separation. I'm usually not team MIL, but Bunny really should have pulled out the big guns, maybe had Trey declared insane - whatever it took to put a stop to that nonsense.
Ha! I think he felt guilty about his "issues".
Exactly. He realized he didn't hold up his end of the marital bargain. He knew she wanted a full sexual partner and children. This was the best he could give her to "make her whole."
Yep. He was just a decent guy. I always liked Trey. Char must've made millions out of this short marriage!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trey is old money wealthy. His family is wealthy, probably from multiple generations of wealth. He went to top schools and got a nice paying job as a doctor.
Big is new money wealthy. He didn't come from wealth (or only modestly wealthy), but went to school and got a very high paying job in NYC.
It's pretty apparent that they were differentiating between old and new money with these two characters.
Where did the show reveal that Big was new money? The episode where he went to the Episcopalian church with his mother made him seem very old money. He always seemed to be connected, too...and the 24/7 driver. Also, his name was John James Preston. I think both he and Trey were old money, and that is why Big wound up with Natasha. He just wasn't as stuffy as Trey. We don't learn as much about his background bc he was supposed to remain a mystery.
No. No. Trey was old money from generational wealth. Big was self-made in finance with UMC wealthy parents (but not family office sort of money). Many wall st. bankers had black cars the firm would expense out for late nights at the office so that’s a moot point
Anonymous wrote:I'm re watching the series and wondering about this.
The first couple of seasons, they're back and forth, back and forth. You get the impression that Carrie wants a commitment and would marry him if he asked but Bif is your typical commitment phobe with FOMO. Ok makes sense.
But then he randomly marries Natasha? Who he couldn't have been dating for that long after Carrie. Wtf, I thought he was a commitment phobe? Then he conducts the affair with Carie, letting you think Carrie is really the woman he is in love with. Carrie leaves him because of the situation and humiliation of the scene with Natasha finding out and chasing them down the stairs and breaking her tooth but I do think that if Big had made his big romantic gesture at that point, a la the finale, she would have fallen into his arms. Then there's an episode in the 5th season where he reaches out to her, they have sex, and he gets scared again and retreats.
So his commitment issues were clearly related to Carrie in particular. What do you think it was about her that scared him? Any thoughts about this.
(I realize this is all fictional and I'm putting too much thought into this)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trey is old money wealthy. His family is wealthy, probably from multiple generations of wealth. He went to top schools and got a nice paying job as a doctor.
Big is new money wealthy. He didn't come from wealth (or only modestly wealthy), but went to school and got a very high paying job in NYC.
It's pretty apparent that they were differentiating between old and new money with these two characters.
+1
SATC did an excellent job portraying NYers from different socioeconomic backgrounds.
Even though there was a social discrepancy between Big and Carrie, Big was not truly upper class. He was cosplaying as upper class socially due to likely having amassed wealth in his profession as a banker to compete with the upper classes.
Like Carrie he was a social climber and his choice of wife reflected that every time. Now that he wanted in , he targeted women from the NYC upper class.
The one-time appearance of his mother does raise questions, however, as she had the airs of someone who was upper class. Her behavior contradicts Big's ostentatious displays of wealth and status. So Maybe he Is supposed to also be upper class?