Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And she should chop off a bunch of inches from that long, stringy hair. It looks ridiculous on a woman her age.
What? Most people think long hair on a mid-30s woman is just fine.
Huh? It’s very unprofessional.
Long hair in your 30s isn't unprofessional. Come out of the dark ages.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And she should chop off a bunch of inches from that long, stringy hair. It looks ridiculous on a woman her age.
What? Most people think long hair on a mid-30s woman is just fine.
Huh? It’s very unprofessional.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SHS is the kind of woman who would be considered attractive (if plump) in any normal workplace.
No way. Most guys aren't attracted to women with one lazy eye and another that droops.
I agree.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SHS is the kind of woman who would be considered attractive (if plump) in any normal workplace.
No way. Most guys aren't attracted to women with one lazy eye and another that droops.
Anonymous wrote:SHS is the kind of woman who would be considered attractive (if plump) in any normal workplace.
Anonymous wrote:No, the truly unprofessional part is non-stop lying.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And she should chop off a bunch of inches from that long, stringy hair. It looks ridiculous on a woman her age.
What? Most people think long hair on a mid-30s woman is just fine.
Huh? It’s very unprofessional.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And she should chop off a bunch of inches from that long, stringy hair. It looks ridiculous on a woman her age.
What? Most people think long hair on a mid-30s woman is just fine.
Anonymous wrote:And she should chop off a bunch of inches from that long, stringy hair. It looks ridiculous on a woman her age.