Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:#28 van ness Prek4
Ugh I already know it won't happen
Nopes, but swami is still stunned by the weird PR created school that is VN
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PK 4
LAMB 16
HD Cooke 4
Shining Stars 42
Swami needs to know if these are WL numbers today or at initial release
These are as of today.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PK 4
LAMB 16
HD Cooke 4
Shining Stars 42
Swami needs to know if these are WL numbers today or at initial release
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:#3 at Murch for PK4?
Swami: Yes. By 15-Aug
Anonymous wrote:PK 4
LAMB 16
HD Cooke 4
Shining Stars 42
Anonymous wrote:#28 van ness Prek4
Ugh I already know it won't happen
Anonymous wrote:Dear Swami,
We applied for pk-3.
#1 Two Rivers at Young
#3 Inspired Teaching Demonstration
#9 Capitol Hill Montessori
#29 Elsie Whitlow Stokes Community Freedom PCS (French Language Program)
#39 School within school
What do you think?
Thanks
Anonymous wrote:Dearest Lottery Swami,
We will be moving to DC and applying for the lottery next year for PK-4 slot. Can you just make my list for me? But for real do you consult on lists pre-lottery?
Anonymous wrote:Thank you but do you think we will get in at either spot? Just noticed today we're now #2 at SWS!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:#3 at school within school
#38 at Brent
Matched at IB school in SWDC
You must have a very, very good master number. There are 30 IB kids on the PK4 waitlist at Brent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:#3 at Murch for PK4?
Swami says by 15-August
What about #5 for PK 4 at Murch - will this be the year all IB kids don't get a spot?
Anonymous wrote:PK3
13 at Peabody (IB)
9 at Tyler Spanish immersion
What say you, Swami?
Anonymous wrote:PK3:
15 at EL Haynes
22 at Bruce Monroe (DL, Eng)
Thoughts?
Anonymous wrote:#3 at Murch for PK4?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:#1 at LAMB for K.
I can't imagine a world where your kindergartener won't get in. Swami?
Swami thinks that you, personally, will be the ultimate test on whether LAMB intends to allow in order grades or add additional PK3 or PK4 children to reach their ceiling in the primary environment. So swami sits with you, thinking 65% no, 35% yes.
Does it change your analysis that the K child has a sibling matched for pk3?