Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think we should reference the position of pro-abortion & anti-abortion. Instead of pro-choice/pro-life.
Just because I am pro-choice, it does not imply that I am not pro-life.
Likewise just because I'm pro-choice, doesn't mean that I'm "pro-abortion". Abortion is a choice that should be available to everyone, but it doesn't mean I want people to have one. In an ideal world there would be no unplanned pregnancies, no unwanted pregnancies and no unhealthy pregnancies. But we don't live in an ideal world so elective abortion is available.
Do most of you know that the clinical term for a miscarriage is also abortion? I miscarried a very wanted baby at 12 weeks and found it recorded in my medical records as an abortion. And I couldn't get treatment until I provided clinical proof that my baby was already dead -- I couldn't even see the doctor for my D&C until it was proven that my baby had no heartbeat (which the doctor would of course have checked before doing the procedure). THIS is what the "pro-life" movement does. They make it more difficult for grieving women to get the treatment they need. Make me feel SHAME that my baby died. That's not pro-"LIFE" it's anti-life and anti-caring and anti-women. Show some compassion for your fellow women.
Me too. Which got me thinking - are these 'abortions' excluded when they do the stats on how many women have had abortions? Or are they lumping them together?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP again - that Rolling Stone article doesn't address the question. It wasn't a legal or constitutional question, but a data question. When collecting statistics on abortion, what 'counts' as an abortion. As a PP and I point out our medical records state 'abortion' but procedures secondary to miscarriage aren't what any sane person thinks about when having a debate on abortion.
PP here who posted Rolling Stone article - agree it doesn't address that issue, but I posted that for the macro point on body integrity. Sorry if not creating a new paragraph implied that I thought they were related - I was rushing to get dinner on the table.
I also had what you both experienced - twice. Once at 12 weeks, and once at six weeks. They were "missed miscarriages", but they are still spontaneous abortions, because your body ended the pregnancy. I had to have a D&C both times as well, and both times the fetus had already passed away. Spontaneous abortion does not require that your body expels the pregnancy (sorry to be graphic). Almost all medical records that I have been privy to make a distinction between elective and spontaneous. Your D&Cs were not elective abortions because you no longer had a viable pregnancy.
Anonymous wrote:The thing is, when you have a baby growing inside you, it's not just your Bidy anymore, you selfish, short-sighted jerks. It's the baby's body, too.
I find it hilarious that you libs have no problem killing off innocent babies, and at the same time lobby against putting rapists, torturers, and murderers to death.
Anonymous wrote:PP again - that Rolling Stone article doesn't address the question. It wasn't a legal or constitutional question, but a data question. When collecting statistics on abortion, what 'counts' as an abortion. As a PP and I point out our medical records state 'abortion' but procedures secondary to miscarriage aren't what any sane person thinks about when having a debate on abortion.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are a wide variety of reasons why someone may choose abortion. That is a serious decision for that person and her doctor to make. Not me. And certainly not the government.
The thing that I don't get is why pro-lifers stop caring about that life after it's born.
Why do you think they don't care?
Also I said that I am okay with abortion for extremely unfortunate circumstances. If a pregnancy is not viable or a danger to the mother, that is okay and should be legal everywhere. My issue is with frivolous abortions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only reason you pro choice people can be on this thread is because you weren't aborted. How many of you would be ok with it if your parent had decided to abort you?
I wouldn't be here to know.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think we should reference the position of pro-abortion & anti-abortion. Instead of pro-choice/pro-life.
Just because I am pro-choice, it does not imply that I am not pro-life.
Likewise just because I'm pro-choice, doesn't mean that I'm "pro-abortion". Abortion is a choice that should be available to everyone, but it doesn't mean I want people to have one. In an ideal world there would be no unplanned pregnancies, no unwanted pregnancies and no unhealthy pregnancies. But we don't live in an ideal world so elective abortion is available.
Do most of you know that the clinical term for a miscarriage is also abortion? I miscarried a very wanted baby at 12 weeks and found it recorded in my medical records as an abortion. And I couldn't get treatment until I provided clinical proof that my baby was already dead -- I couldn't even see the doctor for my D&C until it was proven that my baby had no heartbeat (which the doctor would of course have checked before doing the procedure). THIS is what the "pro-life" movement does. They make it more difficult for grieving women to get the treatment they need. Make me feel SHAME that my baby died. That's not pro-"LIFE" it's anti-life and anti-caring and anti-women. Show some compassion for your fellow women.
Me too. Which got me thinking - are these 'abortions' excluded when they do the stats on how many women have had abortions? Or are they lumping them together?
They are not lumped together. One is considered spontaneous (miscarriage) and the other is elective. The Constitution protects this right under the 4th and 15th amendments. http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/will-america-lose-roe-v-wade-under-trump-w461361
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think we should reference the position of pro-abortion & anti-abortion. Instead of pro-choice/pro-life.
Just because I am pro-choice, it does not imply that I am not pro-life.
Likewise just because I'm pro-choice, doesn't mean that I'm "pro-abortion". Abortion is a choice that should be available to everyone, but it doesn't mean I want people to have one. In an ideal world there would be no unplanned pregnancies, no unwanted pregnancies and no unhealthy pregnancies. But we don't live in an ideal world so elective abortion is available.
Do most of you know that the clinical term for a miscarriage is also abortion? I miscarried a very wanted baby at 12 weeks and found it recorded in my medical records as an abortion. And I couldn't get treatment until I provided clinical proof that my baby was already dead -- I couldn't even see the doctor for my D&C until it was proven that my baby had no heartbeat (which the doctor would of course have checked before doing the procedure). THIS is what the "pro-life" movement does. They make it more difficult for grieving women to get the treatment they need. Make me feel SHAME that my baby died. That's not pro-"LIFE" it's anti-life and anti-caring and anti-women. Show some compassion for your fellow women.
Me too. Which got me thinking - are these 'abortions' excluded when they do the stats on how many women have had abortions? Or are they lumping them together?
Anonymous wrote:The only reason you pro choice people can be on this thread is because you weren't aborted. How many of you would be ok with it if your parent had decided to abort you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think we should reference the position of pro-abortion & anti-abortion. Instead of pro-choice/pro-life.
Just because I am pro-choice, it does not imply that I am not pro-life.
Likewise just because I'm pro-choice, doesn't mean that I'm "pro-abortion". Abortion is a choice that should be available to everyone, but it doesn't mean I want people to have one. In an ideal world there would be no unplanned pregnancies, no unwanted pregnancies and no unhealthy pregnancies. But we don't live in an ideal world so elective abortion is available.
Do most of you know that the clinical term for a miscarriage is also abortion? I miscarried a very wanted baby at 12 weeks and found it recorded in my medical records as an abortion. And I couldn't get treatment until I provided clinical proof that my baby was already dead -- I couldn't even see the doctor for my D&C until it was proven that my baby had no heartbeat (which the doctor would of course have checked before doing the procedure). THIS is what the "pro-life" movement does. They make it more difficult for grieving women to get the treatment they need. Make me feel SHAME that my baby died. That's not pro-"LIFE" it's anti-life and anti-caring and anti-women. Show some compassion for your fellow women.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are a wide variety of reasons why someone may choose abortion. That is a serious decision for that person and her doctor to make. Not me. And certainly not the government.
The thing that I don't get is why pro-lifers stop caring about that life after it's born.
Why do you think they don't care?
Also I said that I am okay with abortion for extremely unfortunate circumstances. If a pregnancy is not viable or a danger to the mother, that is okay and should be legal everywhere. My issue is with frivolous abortions.
What is frivolous to you in your life may not be frivolous to someone else in their life. Why is this so complicated for you to understand? It's my body. It's my damn choice. Not yours. You worry about what you do, and I'll worry about what I do. I hate that anyone else thinks they know my life or can dictate what I should / shouldn't be able to do with my body. And yes, I do hate pro-lifers because for the life of me, I cannot understand why you can't keep your business out of the lives of others.
+1