Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the Arlington School Board proposed to sprinkle the poors equally between north and south, there would literally be a civil war in Arlington County. The families in North would claim they should not be forced to pay for the “poor” decisions of the families in the South. And the families in the South would claim that the families in the North should pay. In a capitalistic society where you have winners and poors, you will always have this dymamic- the wealthy want to stay away from the poors and the poors want to stay away from the other poors and latch onto the resources of the wealthy.
If there was equity, there would not be "poor" decisions. We all pay taxes, we're all entitled to equal education.
Eliminate choice schools and you'll get it.
Anonymous wrote:this is an Arlington County problem, not a N/S problem. Route 50 isn't a wall of some sort. Its disgusting that people continue to perpetuate this idea that it is only S Arlington and the S Arlington UMC's problem to solve.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the Arlington School Board proposed to sprinkle the poors equally between north and south, there would literally be a civil war in Arlington County. The families in North would claim they should not be forced to pay for the “poor” decisions of the families in the South. And the families in the South would claim that the families in the North should pay. In a capitalistic society where you have winners and poors, you will always have this dymamic- the wealthy want to stay away from the poors and the poors want to stay away from the other poors and latch onto the resources of the wealthy.
If there was equity, there would not be "poor" decisions. We all pay taxes, we're all entitled to equal education.
Eliminate choice schools and you'll get it.
Dp- you will Get familes moving and going private. You need to do some math. That will clear your crazy ideas up.
The only crazy idea is that the entire country should gyrate to fix a SA UMC problem that can be entirely solved by SA UMC people.
I’m not sure how many times more times we can point out that even if ALL SA UMC families currently choiced out went to their home school, it wouldn’t make up the difference. Those people will absolutely help some, but it is at its core a zoning issue.
If you take away the escape valve, the UMC in South Arlington who go public home school should at least get a tax credit or rebate of some kind for being forced to send their kids to school with high FARMS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the Arlington School Board proposed to sprinkle the poors equally between north and south, there would literally be a civil war in Arlington County. The families in North would claim they should not be forced to pay for the “poor” decisions of the families in the South. And the families in the South would claim that the families in the North should pay. In a capitalistic society where you have winners and poors, you will always have this dymamic- the wealthy want to stay away from the poors and the poors want to stay away from the other poors and latch onto the resources of the wealthy.
If there was equity, there would not be "poor" decisions. We all pay taxes, we're all entitled to equal education.
Eliminate choice schools and you'll get it.
Dp- you will Get familes moving and going private. You need to do some math. That will clear your crazy ideas up.
The only crazy idea is that the entire country should gyrate to fix a SA UMC problem that can be entirely solved by SA UMC people.
I’m not sure how many times more times we can point out that even if ALL SA UMC families currently choiced out went to their home school, it wouldn’t make up the difference. Those people will absolutely help some, but it is at its core a zoning issue.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the Arlington School Board proposed to sprinkle the poors equally between north and south, there would literally be a civil war in Arlington County. The families in North would claim they should not be forced to pay for the “poor” decisions of the families in the South. And the families in the South would claim that the families in the North should pay. In a capitalistic society where you have winners and poors, you will always have this dymamic- the wealthy want to stay away from the poors and the poors want to stay away from the other poors and latch onto the resources of the wealthy.
If there was equity, there would not be "poor" decisions. We all pay taxes, we're all entitled to equal education.
Eliminate choice schools and you'll get it.
Dp- you will Get familes moving and going private. You need to do some math. That will clear your crazy ideas up.
The only crazy idea is that the entire country should gyrate to fix a SA UMC problem that can be entirely solved by SA UMC people.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the Arlington School Board proposed to sprinkle the poors equally between north and south, there would literally be a civil war in Arlington County. The families in North would claim they should not be forced to pay for the “poor” decisions of the families in the South. And the families in the South would claim that the families in the North should pay. In a capitalistic society where you have winners and poors, you will always have this dymamic- the wealthy want to stay away from the poors and the poors want to stay away from the other poors and latch onto the resources of the wealthy.
If there was equity, there would not be "poor" decisions. We all pay taxes, we're all entitled to equal education.
Eliminate choice schools and you'll get it.
Dp- you will Get familes moving and going private. You need to do some math. That will clear your crazy ideas up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the Arlington School Board proposed to sprinkle the poors equally between north and south, there would literally be a civil war in Arlington County. The families in North would claim they should not be forced to pay for the “poor” decisions of the families in the South. And the families in the South would claim that the families in the North should pay. In a capitalistic society where you have winners and poors, you will always have this dymamic- the wealthy want to stay away from the poors and the poors want to stay away from the other poors and latch onto the resources of the wealthy.
If there was equity, there would not be "poor" decisions. We all pay taxes, we're all entitled to equal education.
Eliminate choice schools and you'll get it.
Dp- you will Get familes moving and going private. You need to do some math. That will clear your crazy ideas up.
Anonymous wrote:Must we go around and around again on this? I'd like a separate APS board with a sticky at the top that says these:
1. Housing policy creates segregation.
2. School board can't fix problems of #1 without busing.
3. No one, rich or poor, wants to be bused.
Lather, rinse, repeat.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the Arlington School Board proposed to sprinkle the poors equally between north and south, there would literally be a civil war in Arlington County. The families in North would claim they should not be forced to pay for the “poor” decisions of the families in the South. And the families in the South would claim that the families in the North should pay. In a capitalistic society where you have winners and poors, you will always have this dymamic- the wealthy want to stay away from the poors and the poors want to stay away from the other poors and latch onto the resources of the wealthy.
If there was equity, there would not be "poor" decisions. We all pay taxes, we're all entitled to equal education.
Eliminate choice schools and you'll get it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Must we go around and around again on this? I'd like a separate APS board with a sticky at the top that says these:
1. Housing policy creates segregation.
2. School board can't fix problems of #1 without busing.
3. No one, rich or poor, wants to be involuntarily bused.
Lather, rinse, repeat.
Except all the kids voluntarily attending option schools. And also those who live too far from any school to safely walk.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the Arlington School Board proposed to sprinkle the poors equally between north and south, there would literally be a civil war in Arlington County. The families in North would claim they should not be forced to pay for the “poor” decisions of the families in the South. And the families in the South would claim that the families in the North should pay. In a capitalistic society where you have winners and poors, you will always have this dymamic- the wealthy want to stay away from the poors and the poors want to stay away from the other poors and latch onto the resources of the wealthy.
If there was equity, there would not be "poor" decisions. We all pay taxes, we're all entitled to equal education.
Anonymous wrote:Must we go around and around again on this? I'd like a separate APS board with a sticky at the top that says these:
1. Housing policy creates segregation.
2. School board can't fix problems of #1 without busing.
3. No one, rich or poor, wants to be bused.
Lather, rinse, repeat.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Must we go around and around again on this? I'd like a separate APS board with a sticky at the top that says these:
1. Housing policy creates segregation.
2. School board can't fix problems of #1 without busing.
3. No one, rich or poor, wants to be bused.
Lather, rinse, repeat.
Yup. Love making self satisfied liberals in NA face their inner conservatism.