You're so lazy! Don't be like your ancestors, do your own work Becky...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^ post their profile/stats and i can tell you why. that's no rocket science.

I just gave you their profile: The 42 white students ALL had lower scores than Abby Fisher. You have no problem opining about why non-white students are admitted with lower scores (without knowing anything else about their "profile" ). So please tell me why these white students were admitted with lower scores than Abby. Why shouldn't she sue over that? I mean, they did take "her" seat after all.

I don't consider your blanket statement their profile. Maybe they were in top 10% of their class even with lower scores. Give me applicant by applicant profile of gender, GPA, test scores, any hooks, % of class, ECs. Now, go get it. You can do it.

The top 10% were already admitted (that's based on grades, not SAT/ACT scores). Abby and the 42 white students with lower scores who were admitted did NOT graduate in the 10% of their class. They were considered in a different pool.

Just as I suspected...you have nothing but excuses for this pathetic lawsuit. You cannot defend the indefensible. You and Abby are both mediocre.

Sure bro. Whatever makes you happy.

Ok, Becky with the bad argument.

I don't know who Becky is but that's okay.

Let me know when you have their profiles and I can walk you thru one by one what happened.

I'll do that right after you answer my question. But you can't, so I won't. Bye Becky!

You are a strange little man. You are the one who asked the question on why those kids didn't get in. I am willing to help you if you post their profiles. Each student is different. Only way anyway can answer is review of each student's profile. If your intention is somehow trick me with your stupid (I mean clever) question, I'd say go pound sand. What is this Becky stuff anyway??

If you don't have it, go away little man.

You're so lazy! Don't be like your ancestors, do your own work Becky...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^ post their profile/stats and i can tell you why. that's no rocket science.

I just gave you their profile: The 42 white students ALL had lower scores than Abby Fisher. You have no problem opining about why non-white students are admitted with lower scores (without knowing anything else about their "profile" ). So please tell me why these white students were admitted with lower scores than Abby. Why shouldn't she sue over that? I mean, they did take "her" seat after all.

I don't consider your blanket statement their profile. Maybe they were in top 10% of their class even with lower scores. Give me applicant by applicant profile of gender, GPA, test scores, any hooks, % of class, ECs. Now, go get it. You can do it.

The top 10% were already admitted (that's based on grades, not SAT/ACT scores). Abby and the 42 white students with lower scores who were admitted did NOT graduate in the 10% of their class. They were considered in a different pool.

Just as I suspected...you have nothing but excuses for this pathetic lawsuit. You cannot defend the indefensible. You and Abby are both mediocre.

Sure bro. Whatever makes you happy.

Ok, Becky with the bad argument.

I don't know who Becky is but that's okay.

Let me know when you have their profiles and I can walk you thru one by one what happened.

I'll do that right after you answer my question. But you can't, so I won't. Bye Becky!

You are a strange little man. You are the one who asked the question on why those kids didn't get in. I am willing to help you if you post their profiles. Each student is different. Only way anyway can answer is review of each student's profile. If your intention is somehow trick me with your stupid (I mean clever) question, I'd say go pound sand. What is this Becky stuff anyway??

If you don't have it, go away little man.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Should I be concerned about proving anything to you or anyone else? I'm not.

However, I do recognize that if people don't believe me it's most likely because they don't want to believe me. A successful Black woman who has benefited from AA who embraces that fact. You want me to feel ashamed, and I don't. It also bothers you that I enjoy more material success than most of you posting here. If my arrogance offends you...too bad.

I think people have hard time understanding how you can live yourself knowing you didn't get where you are by your own merit.

New poster: First, I assume English is your second language from your diction so I thought I might fill you in about some American History. The Ivy league Universities (and most other colleges) were created for men born into a certain social class. Historically, there were no testing requirements for entry. There are still thousand of legacy, rich kids, and famous children attending elite schools because of their ancestors who would not be admitted based on their personal record. These same kids go onto elite jobs ot based on their record but their connection. Do you want them all to walk around embarrassed? Are you angry at the multi-generations of Kennedy, Rockefeller and Roosevelt Ivy leaguers? The kids of Fortune 100 company CEOs? At people who inherit money? Or is that all fine if they are white.

Please tell me why you think English is her second language . If it is , that would mean she's bilingual . Something many of you here can't say .

OP: She is missing words. "I think people have hard time"... "you can live yourself knowing". I know you want to offer a vigorous defense but that is not proper diction. It appears she either can not write or its her second language. Moreover, her reasoning was illogical... Essentially, don't you feel terrible with all those legacies, rich people and athletes that you were helped in your admittance. If she was American she would have made sure her kid fit in some category to increase their chances of admittance if that was the desired result. Basically, best at something in addition to test and GPA.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^ post their profile/stats and i can tell you why. that's no rocket science.

I just gave you their profile: The 42 white students ALL had lower scores than Abby Fisher. You have no problem opining about why non-white students are admitted with lower scores (without knowing anything else about their "profile" ). So please tell me why these white students were admitted with lower scores than Abby. Why shouldn't she sue over that? I mean, they did take "her" seat after all.

I don't consider your blanket statement their profile. Maybe they were in top 10% of their class even with lower scores. Give me applicant by applicant profile of gender, GPA, test scores, any hooks, % of class, ECs. Now, go get it. You can do it.

The top 10% were already admitted (that's based on grades, not SAT/ACT scores). Abby and the 42 white students with lower scores who were admitted did NOT graduate in the 10% of their class. They were considered in a different pool.

Just as I suspected...you have nothing but excuses for this pathetic lawsuit. You cannot defend the indefensible. You and Abby are both mediocre.

Sure bro. Whatever makes you happy.

Ok, Becky with the bad argument.

I don't know who Becky is but that's okay.

Let me know when you have their profiles and I can walk you thru one by one what happened.

I'll do that right after you answer my question. But you can't, so I won't. Bye Becky!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^ post their profile/stats and i can tell you why. that's no rocket science.

I just gave you their profile: The 42 white students ALL had lower scores than Abby Fisher. You have no problem opining about why non-white students are admitted with lower scores (without knowing anything else about their "profile" ). So please tell me why these white students were admitted with lower scores than Abby. Why shouldn't she sue over that? I mean, they did take "her" seat after all.

I don't consider your blanket statement their profile. Maybe they were in top 10% of their class even with lower scores. Give me applicant by applicant profile of gender, GPA, test scores, any hooks, % of class, ECs. Now, go get it. You can do it.

The top 10% were already admitted (that's based on grades, not SAT/ACT scores). Abby and the 42 white students with lower scores who were admitted did NOT graduate in the 10% of their class. They were considered in a different pool.

Just as I suspected...you have nothing but excuses for this pathetic lawsuit. You cannot defend the indefensible. You and Abby are both mediocre.

NP. Without more information on those 42, who knows why they were admitted. For example, my DS attends a top SLAC and his roommate went to a magnet high school in TX ranked in the top 30 in the country. He did not graduate in the top 10% due to the caliber of student that attends the high school but nevertheless has almost a full merit scholarship to the SLAC based on his high school record.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^ post their profile/stats and i can tell you why. that's no rocket science.

I just gave you their profile: The 42 white students ALL had lower scores than Abby Fisher. You have no problem opining about why non-white students are admitted with lower scores (without knowing anything else about their "profile" ). So please tell me why these white students were admitted with lower scores than Abby. Why shouldn't she sue over that? I mean, they did take "her" seat after all.

I don't consider your blanket statement their profile. Maybe they were in top 10% of their class even with lower scores. Give me applicant by applicant profile of gender, GPA, test scores, any hooks, % of class, ECs. Now, go get it. You can do it.

The top 10% were already admitted (that's based on grades, not SAT/ACT scores). Abby and the 42 white students with lower scores who were admitted did NOT graduate in the 10% of their class. They were considered in a different pool.

Just as I suspected...you have nothing but excuses for this pathetic lawsuit. You cannot defend the indefensible. You and Abby are both mediocre.

Sure bro. Whatever makes you happy.

Ok, Becky with the bad argument.

I don't know who Becky is but that's okay.

Let me know when you have their profiles and I can walk you thru one by one what happened.

Anonymous wrote:

I'm still waiting.

Maybe you should get back to work if you have a job.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^ post their profile/stats and i can tell you why. that's no rocket science.

I just gave you their profile: The 42 white students ALL had lower scores than Abby Fisher. You have no problem opining about why non-white students are admitted with lower scores (without knowing anything else about their "profile" ). So please tell me why these white students were admitted with lower scores than Abby. Why shouldn't she sue over that? I mean, they did take "her" seat after all.

I don't consider your blanket statement their profile. Maybe they were in top 10% of their class even with lower scores. Give me applicant by applicant profile of gender, GPA, test scores, any hooks, % of class, ECs. Now, go get it. You can do it.

The top 10% were already admitted (that's based on grades, not SAT/ACT scores). Abby and the 42 white students with lower scores who were admitted did NOT graduate in the 10% of their class. They were considered in a different pool.

Just as I suspected...you have nothing but excuses for this pathetic lawsuit. You cannot defend the indefensible. You and Abby are both mediocre.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Should I be concerned about proving anything to you or anyone else? I'm not.

However, I do recognize that if people don't believe me it's most likely because they don't want to believe me. A successful Black woman who has benefited from AA who embraces that fact. You want me to feel ashamed, and I don't. It also bothers you that I enjoy more material success than most of you posting here. If my arrogance offends you...too bad.

I think people have hard time understanding how you can live yourself knowing you didn't get where you are by your own merit.

New poster: First, I assume English is your second language from your diction so I thought I might fill you in about some American History. The Ivy league Universities (and most other colleges) were created for men born into a certain social class. Historically, there were no testing requirements for entry. There are still thousand of legacy, rich kids, and famous children attending elite schools because of their ancestors who would not be admitted based on their personal record. These same kids go onto elite jobs ot based on their record but their connection. Do you want them all to walk around embarrassed? Are you angry at the multi-generations of Kennedy, Rockefeller and Roosevelt Ivy leaguers? The kids of Fortune 100 company CEOs? At people who inherit money? Or is that all fine if they are white.

Please tell me why you think English is her second language . If it is , that would mean she's bilingual . Something many of you here can't say .

OP: She is missing words. "I think people have hard time"... "you can live yourself knowing". I know you want to offer a vigorous defense but that is not proper diction. It appears she either can not write or its her second language. Moreover, her reasoning was illogical... Essentially, don't you feel terrible with all those legacies, rich people and athletes that you were helped in your admittance. If she was American she would have made sure her kid fit in some category to increase their chances of admittance if that was the desired result. Basically, best at something in addition to test and GPA.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^ post their profile/stats and i can tell you why. that's no rocket science.

I just gave you their profile: The 42 white students ALL had lower scores than Abby Fisher. You have no problem opining about why non-white students are admitted with lower scores (without knowing anything else about their "profile" ). So please tell me why these white students were admitted with lower scores than Abby. Why shouldn't she sue over that? I mean, they did take "her" seat after all.

I don't consider your blanket statement their profile. Maybe they were in top 10% of their class even with lower scores. Give me applicant by applicant profile of gender, GPA, test scores, any hooks, % of class, ECs. Now, go get it. You can do it.

The top 10% were already admitted (that's based on grades, not SAT/ACT scores). Abby and the 42 white students with lower scores who were admitted did NOT graduate in the 10% of their class. They were considered in a different pool.

Just as I suspected...you have nothing but excuses for this pathetic lawsuit. You cannot defend the indefensible. You and Abby are both mediocre.

Sure bro. Whatever makes you happy.

Ok, Becky with the bad argument.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^ post their profile/stats and i can tell you why. that's no rocket science.

I just gave you their profile: The 42 white students ALL had lower scores than Abby Fisher. You have no problem opining about why non-white students are admitted with lower scores (without knowing anything else about their "profile" ). So please tell me why these white students were admitted with lower scores than Abby. Why shouldn't she sue over that? I mean, they did take "her" seat after all.

I don't consider your blanket statement their profile. Maybe they were in top 10% of their class even with lower scores. Give me applicant by applicant profile of gender, GPA, test scores, any hooks, % of class, ECs. Now, go get it. You can do it.

The top 10% were already admitted (that's based on grades, not SAT/ACT scores). Abby and the 42 white students with lower scores who were admitted did NOT graduate in the 10% of their class. They were considered in a different pool.

Just as I suspected...you have nothing but excuses for this pathetic lawsuit. You cannot defend the indefensible. You and Abby are both mediocre.

Sure bro. Whatever makes you happy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Should I be concerned about proving anything to you or anyone else? I'm not.

However, I do recognize that if people don't believe me it's most likely because they don't want to believe me. A successful Black woman who has benefited from AA who embraces that fact. You want me to feel ashamed, and I don't. It also bothers you that I enjoy more material success than most of you posting here. If my arrogance offends you...too bad.

I think people have hard time understanding how you can live yourself knowing you didn't get where you are by your own merit.

New poster: First, I assume English is your second language from your diction so I thought I might fill you in about some American History. The Ivy league Universities (and most other colleges) were created for men born into a certain social class. Historically, there were no testing requirements for entry. There are still thousand of legacy, rich kids, and famous children attending elite schools because of their ancestors who would not be admitted based on their personal record. These same kids go onto elite jobs ot based on their record but their connection. Do you want them all to walk around embarrassed? Are you angry at the multi-generations of Kennedy, Rockefeller and Roosevelt Ivy leaguers? The kids of Fortune 100 company CEOs? At people who inherit money? Or is that all fine if they are white.

Please tell me why you think English is her second language . If it is , that would mean she's bilingual . Something many of you here can't say .

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^ post their profile/stats and i can tell you why. that's no rocket science.

I just gave you their profile: The 42 white students ALL had lower scores than Abby Fisher. You have no problem opining about why non-white students are admitted with lower scores (without knowing anything else about their "profile" ). So please tell me why these white students were admitted with lower scores than Abby. Why shouldn't she sue over that? I mean, they did take "her" seat after all.

I don't consider your blanket statement their profile. Maybe they were in top 10% of their class even with lower scores. Give me applicant by applicant profile of gender, GPA, test scores, any hooks, % of class, ECs. Now, go get it. You can do it.

The top 10% were already admitted (that's based on grades, not SAT/ACT scores). Abby and the 42 white students with lower scores who were admitted did NOT graduate in the 10% of their class. They were considered in a different pool.

Just as I suspected...you have nothing but excuses for this pathetic lawsuit. You cannot defend the indefensible. You and Abby are both mediocre.