Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Actually no need to guess. Today's Washington Post says the tax after the meal tax is for the metro fiasco. Gotta have a dedicated stream of money (in addition to all the other money). Even though the raise in the sales tax was supposed to specifically earmarked for transportation.
A new tax a year....with a pipeline of more. Sigh.....
Time to just say stop.
That's how it was in Maryland under o'malley. I couldn't believe that after I left Maryland they finally got a republican governor. After years of feeling like my vote was thrown away.
Anonymous wrote:Actually no need to guess. Today's Washington Post says the tax after the meal tax is for the metro fiasco. Gotta have a dedicated stream of money (in addition to all the other money). Even though the raise in the sales tax was supposed to specifically earmarked for transportation.
A new tax a year....with a pipeline of more. Sigh.....
Time to just say stop.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is this in addition to the proposed real estate tax increase? Or in lieu of?
in addition. it is my understanding the real estate tax increase is a done deal.
Anonymous wrote:Your part was our part before your left liberal hell holes to come pollute our well.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don't you just love how the democrats leave their jurisdictions with excessively high taxes and go to great places that they proceed to screw up just like the places that they left? Some people will never learn.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh my ass. You're going to stop eating out because it suddenly costs a teeny bit more? It's always cost more than simply throwing a chicken breast, a potato and some vegetables in the oven.
Don't believe me? Ok. It's not about the "teeny bit" of extra cost. It's about f.u. to the tax & spend democrats. And we don't eat much chicken or potatoes either. We eat mostly vegetarian.
And this pp wants republicans/conservatives to leave NOVA:
I don't even understand why conservatives or Republicans live in Fairfax County. You have a whole state who wants you. Leave our blue part alone or just know yes, you will be taxed to fund YOUR child's education and deal with it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All for the meals tax. Let the apartment-living ESL and FARM families contribute something toward the cost to educate their kids when they go to McDonalds.
Less cynically, every other area locally hams am meals tax. What's the rationale for Fairfax not to have one?
Loudoun doesn't. But even if it did, what sort of argument is "Well, every other county has one."? My teen is trying to convince us to buy her an iPhone using that same line of reasoning. Pretty juvenile.
It means it won't harm businesses, who are complaining that it will.
Yes it will.
Signed,
Np and a consumer
No, it won't. You are a minority in this. There may be a lot of people like you who will whine about it but there are very few who will stop eating out over a couple of dollars - particularly when many of the surrounding jurisdictions already have it in place.
+1
It might mean that diners will tip a little less, hurting the working class wait staff.
Taxes don't create wealth, they just shift it from one column to another.
Right, they don't. Would you prefer the real estate column or the meals column?
I'd prefer the county handle its finances better, keep the real estate tax rate where it is and let the increase in house values do its thing.
Anonymous wrote:Is this in addition to the proposed real estate tax increase? Or in lieu of?
Anonymous wrote:I really can't imagine that a meals tax will keep those who eat out from going out to eat.
If someone is really "poor", they probably should be preparing meals at home rather than eating out at Chipotle or Noodles 'n Company.
Anonymous wrote:It really shows the hipocrocy of liberals to push so hard for such a regressive tax.
Anonymous wrote:+1Anonymous wrote:They'll never be happy till 100% goes to the collective and they can dole out "free" stuff for the proletariat.
The majority of my income (literally, over 50%) goes to the state now. It's outta control, and getting worse.
+1Anonymous wrote:They'll never be happy till 100% goes to the collective and they can dole out "free" stuff for the proletariat.
The majority of my income (literally, over 50%) goes to the state now. It's outta control, and getting worse.

Anonymous wrote:Why on earth would anyone vote no to the meals tax? Right now the entire cost of schools rests on the shoulders of homeowners. Those who use the most services - FARM - pay nothing because they don't own homes. But the DO eat out. Yes, probably just fast food, but they should pay their share too. And the tax is barely noticeable to the consumer - most people don't even realize that many of the local cities have a meals tax.