Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^Agreed, it's a statement about sexual desire, and PP seems to feel that sexual desire should never be studied or discussed critically, which makes sense given her personal experiences.

As demonstrated, it doesn't make the statement correct.

Now you're just making shit up.

"anyone who shames sexuality is nuts"

Anyone who shames their spouse for sexually desiring them with an out of hand dismissal and a comment to just use their hand and get over it is nuts. And an asshole.
Be real about the discussion you were having.

That's not what she said. In fact, I quoted her directly.

Talk about making shit up.

Lmao- someone needs to scroll up. Or take something for their memory. This tap dancing you're doing is amazing.

Yeah and that person is you.

As stated, I quoted directly.

You, on the other hand..... did not.

Everyone can read the convo here and see you tried to shame the man by telling him things changed and he needs to just deal with it and take matters into his own hands. That knee jerk shaming of his desire was wrong. And everyone who cares about their marriage knows that that dismissive attitude isn't what you take when trying to resolve marital issues. And a sudden change in the status quo is a marital issue. Both parties get to be heard and both get a say. But by all means,keep up the good fight against compromise!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^Agreed, it's a statement about sexual desire, and PP seems to feel that sexual desire should never be studied or discussed critically, which makes sense given her personal experiences.

As demonstrated, it doesn't make the statement correct.

Now you're just making shit up.

"anyone who shames sexuality is nuts"

Anyone who shames their spouse for sexually desiring them with an out of hand dismissal and a comment to just use their hand and get over it is nuts. And an asshole.
Be real about the discussion you were having.

Reading back over the thread the point is when one spouse tries to make it a obligation or a job. Therein lies the real problem.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^Agreed, it's a statement about sexual desire, and PP seems to feel that sexual desire should never be studied or discussed critically, which makes sense given her personal experiences.

As demonstrated, it doesn't make the statement correct.

Now you're just making shit up.

"anyone who shames sexuality is nuts"

Anyone who shames their spouse for sexually desiring them with an out of hand dismissal and a comment to just use their hand and get over it is nuts. And an asshole.
Be real about the discussion you were having.

That's not what she said. In fact, I quoted her directly.

Talk about making shit up.

Lmao- someone needs to scroll up. Or take something for their memory. This tap dancing you're doing is amazing.

Yeah and that person is you.

As stated, I quoted directly.

You, on the other hand..... did not.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^Agreed, it's a statement about sexual desire, and PP seems to feel that sexual desire should never be studied or discussed critically, which makes sense given her personal experiences.

As demonstrated, it doesn't make the statement correct.

Now you're just making shit up.

"anyone who shames sexuality is nuts"

Anyone who shames their spouse for sexually desiring them with an out of hand dismissal and a comment to just use their hand and get over it is nuts. And an asshole.
Be real about the discussion you were having.

That's not what she said. In fact, I quoted her directly.

Talk about making shit up.

Lmao- someone needs to scroll up. Or take something for their memory. This tap dancing you're doing is amazing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Refreshing honesty from alot of the ladies here.
Sounds like a lot women who no longer care for sex.
How sad. Don't be surprised when your men stray with a younger woman who still has some libido.

Not true for many of us ladies at all.
And not true for partners who love and respect each other's needs either way. It sounds like that's a rare thing.

Sex has all sorts of positive benefits on your mood, sleep and health too:

http://news.softpedia.com/news/Why-Having-Sex-20-Good-Health-Reasons-71825.shtml

That is unpossible. Sex is a tool of the patriarchy to dominate and marginalize women. Now slap yourself for internalizing their misogyny.

I dont know if I would go that far, but it sure has been used as an excuse for some pretty shitty things, like the afore-mentioned pedophilia.

Thinking critically about the sex drive, and understanding that being turned on does not entitle you to sex, regardless of the situation, is a step in the right direction, towards a happier future. And it's something everyone can work for, both those who are married and those who are not.

Your feminist ideological fervor is lacking. Report yourself to the nearest political officer.

What about your men's rights cards? Have you reported in with Roosh or Paul Elam today?

I am not now, nor have I ever been, a card carrying member of any men's organization. I am merely an independent thinker who is creeped out by your bizarre brand of feminism.

But...Pedophilia! Sex trafficking! Porn! Clubbed baby seals!
Oh, we aren't playing the game where we throw out random hot button issues to try to make something stick?

If you can't see how pedophilia and trafficking relates to male sexual entitlement, then you have bigger issues.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Refreshing honesty from alot of the ladies here.
Sounds like a lot women who no longer care for sex.
How sad. Don't be surprised when your men stray with a younger woman who still has some libido.

Not true for many of us ladies at all.
And not true for partners who love and respect each other's needs either way. It sounds like that's a rare thing.

Sex has all sorts of positive benefits on your mood, sleep and health too:

http://news.softpedia.com/news/Why-Having-Sex-20-Good-Health-Reasons-71825.shtml

That is unpossible. Sex is a tool of the patriarchy to dominate and marginalize women. Now slap yourself for internalizing their misogyny.

I dont know if I would go that far, but it sure has been used as an excuse for some pretty shitty things, like the afore-mentioned pedophilia.

Thinking critically about the sex drive, and understanding that being turned on does not entitle you to sex, regardless of the situation, is a step in the right direction, towards a happier future. And it's something everyone can work for, both those who are married and those who are not.

Your feminist ideological fervor is lacking. Report yourself to the nearest political officer.

What about your men's rights cards? Have you reported in with Roosh or Paul Elam today?

I am not now, nor have I ever been, a card carrying member of any men's organization. I am merely an independent thinker who is creeped out by your bizarre brand of feminism.

But...Pedophilia! Sex trafficking! Porn! Clubbed baby seals!
Oh, we aren't playing the game where we throw out random hot button issues to try to make something stick?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Refreshing honesty from alot of the ladies here.
Sounds like a lot women who no longer care for sex.
How sad. Don't be surprised when your men stray with a younger woman who still has some libido.

Not true for many of us ladies at all.
And not true for partners who love and respect each other's needs either way. It sounds like that's a rare thing.

Sex has all sorts of positive benefits on your mood, sleep and health too:

http://news.softpedia.com/news/Why-Having-Sex-20-Good-Health-Reasons-71825.shtml

That is unpossible. Sex is a tool of the patriarchy to dominate and marginalize women. Now slap yourself for internalizing their misogyny.

I dont know if I would go that far, but it sure has been used as an excuse for some pretty shitty things, like the afore-mentioned pedophilia.

Thinking critically about the sex drive, and understanding that being turned on does not entitle you to sex, regardless of the situation, is a step in the right direction, towards a happier future. And it's something everyone can work for, both those who are married and those who are not.

Your feminist ideological fervor is lacking. Report yourself to the nearest political officer.

What about your men's rights cards? Have you reported in with Roosh or Paul Elam today?

I am not now, nor have I ever been, a card carrying member of any men's organization. I am merely an independent thinker who is creeped out by your bizarre brand of feminism.

Men have been creeped out by feminism since its inception. Female autonomy in general, really.

So that's nothing new.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^Agreed, it's a statement about sexual desire, and PP seems to feel that sexual desire should never be studied or discussed critically, which makes sense given her personal experiences.

As demonstrated, it doesn't make the statement correct.

Now you're just making shit up.

"anyone who shames sexuality is nuts"

Anyone who shames their spouse for sexually desiring them with an out of hand dismissal and a comment to just use their hand and get over it is nuts. And an asshole.
Be real about the discussion you were having.

That's not what she said. In fact, I quoted her directly.

Talk about making shit up.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^Agreed, it's a statement about sexual desire, and PP seems to feel that sexual desire should never be studied or discussed critically, which makes sense given her personal experiences.

As demonstrated, it doesn't make the statement correct.

Now you're just making shit up.

"anyone who shames sexuality is nuts"

Anyone who shames their spouse for sexually desiring them with an out of hand dismissal and a comment to just use their hand and get over it is nuts. And an asshole.
Be real about the discussion you were having.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Refreshing honesty from alot of the ladies here.
Sounds like a lot women who no longer care for sex.
How sad. Don't be surprised when your men stray with a younger woman who still has some libido.

Not true for many of us ladies at all.
And not true for partners who love and respect each other's needs either way. It sounds like that's a rare thing.

Sex has all sorts of positive benefits on your mood, sleep and health too:

http://news.softpedia.com/news/Why-Having-Sex-20-Good-Health-Reasons-71825.shtml

That is unpossible. Sex is a tool of the patriarchy to dominate and marginalize women. Now slap yourself for internalizing their misogyny.

I dont know if I would go that far, but it sure has been used as an excuse for some pretty shitty things, like the afore-mentioned pedophilia.

Thinking critically about the sex drive, and understanding that being turned on does not entitle you to sex, regardless of the situation, is a step in the right direction, towards a happier future. And it's something everyone can work for, both those who are married and those who are not.

Your feminist ideological fervor is lacking. Report yourself to the nearest political officer.

What about your men's rights cards? Have you reported in with Roosh or Paul Elam today?

I am not now, nor have I ever been, a card carrying member of any men's organization. I am merely an independent thinker who is creeped out by your bizarre brand of feminism.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^Agreed, it's a statement about sexual desire, and PP seems to feel that sexual desire should never be studied or discussed critically, which makes sense given her personal experiences.

As demonstrated, it doesn't make the statement correct.

Now you're just making shit up.

"anyone who shames sexuality is nuts"

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Refreshing honesty from alot of the ladies here.
Sounds like a lot women who no longer care for sex.
How sad. Don't be surprised when your men stray with a younger woman who still has some libido.

Not true for many of us ladies at all.
And not true for partners who love and respect each other's needs either way. It sounds like that's a rare thing.

Sex has all sorts of positive benefits on your mood, sleep and health too:

http://news.softpedia.com/news/Why-Having-Sex-20-Good-Health-Reasons-71825.shtml

That is unpossible. Sex is a tool of the patriarchy to dominate and marginalize women. Now slap yourself for internalizing their misogyny.

I dont know if I would go that far, but it sure has been used as an excuse for some pretty shitty things, like the afore-mentioned pedophilia.

Thinking critically about the sex drive, and understanding that being turned on does not entitle you to sex, regardless of the situation, is a step in the right direction, towards a happier future. And it's something everyone can work for, both those who are married and those who are not.

Your feminist ideological fervor is lacking. Report yourself to the nearest political officer.

What about your men's rights cards? Have you reported in with Roosh or Paul Elam today?

Anonymous wrote:^Agreed, it's a statement about sexual desire, and PP seems to feel that sexual desire should never be studied or discussed critically, which makes sense given her personal experiences.

As demonstrated, it doesn't make the statement correct.

Now you're just making shit up.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^Agreed, it's a statement about sexual desire, and PP seems to feel that sexual desire should never be studied or discussed critically, which makes sense given her personal experiences.

As demonstrated, it doesn't make the statement correct.

Someone(s) disagrees and thinks you are wrong. Are you going to be able to deal with it?

Oh, I'm sure a lot of people disagree. Plenty of people would love if the world was absolutely centered around the sex drive, specifically men! LOL, this is nothing new.

But I am glad that we seem to be turning over a new leaf in our society. People are being more sex critical, less centered around the desires of the turned-on party and more aware of the consequences those actions can have upon the "desired" party. It's great to see.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Refreshing honesty from alot of the ladies here.
Sounds like a lot women who no longer care for sex.
How sad. Don't be surprised when your men stray with a younger woman who still has some libido.

Not true for many of us ladies at all.
And not true for partners who love and respect each other's needs either way. It sounds like that's a rare thing.

Sex has all sorts of positive benefits on your mood, sleep and health too:

http://news.softpedia.com/news/Why-Having-Sex-20-Good-Health-Reasons-71825.shtml

That is unpossible. Sex is a tool of the patriarchy to dominate and marginalize women. Now slap yourself for internalizing their misogyny.

I dont know if I would go that far, but it sure has been used as an excuse for some pretty shitty things, like the afore-mentioned pedophilia.

Thinking critically about the sex drive, and understanding that being turned on does not entitle you to sex, regardless of the situation, is a step in the right direction, towards a happier future. And it's something everyone can work for, both those who are married and those who are not.

Your feminist ideological fervor is lacking. Report yourself to the nearest political officer.