Anonymous
Post 11/14/2015 21:43     Subject: Are we allowed to say "Islamic terrorists"?
Anonymous wrote:There's no violence in the New Testament. The old regulations were nailed to the cross with Jesus. He taught turn the other cheek, and he without son cast the first stone. The Old Testament brutal rules don't apply to Christianity.


Except this part?

"I will strike her children dead. Then all the churches will know that I am he who searches hearts and minds, and I will repay each of you according to your deeds."
jsteele
Post 11/14/2015 21:43     Subject: Are we allowed to say "Islamic terrorists"?
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Or is that islamophobic? Will this thread get whacked due to PC?


Did you call Timothy McVeigh a Christian terrorist? Do you think he represents Christianity?


Liberals do. On this forum. All the damn time.


Tim mcveigh doesn't meet the basic dictionary definition of a terrorist. Sorry libs - epic fail.


He actually meets it perfectly.
Anonymous
Post 11/14/2015 21:39     Subject: Are we allowed to say "Islamic terrorists"?
Without sin
Anonymous
Post 11/14/2015 21:39     Subject: Are we allowed to say "Islamic terrorists"?
There's no violence in the New Testament. The old regulations were nailed to the cross with Jesus. He taught turn the other cheek, and he without son cast the first stone. The Old Testament brutal rules don't apply to Christianity.
Anonymous
Post 11/14/2015 21:39     Subject: Are we allowed to say "Islamic terrorists"?
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You can say it. But you sound dumb an inbreed.these fools are just terrorists.
As I understand Islam it does not encourage this nonsense.
Is Christianity were globally more popular they'd do it in the name of Jesus


I am sorry but you obvious know zero about Jesus and his teachings.

Turn the other cheek and all that.


Please see: the crusades
Anonymous
Post 11/14/2015 21:36     Subject: Re:Are we allowed to say "Islamic terrorists"?
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What I would like to see is good Muslims not only denouncing terrorist acts in the name of Allah but also denouncing or at least clarifying/revising the scripture verses terrorist use to justify their violence. Denouncing the motive is more meaningful than denouncing the violent act.


I propose revising the bible to remove the part about taking glee in dashing babies against rocks, and so very many others.


would that be the old testament? try reading the new.


Have you read the New Testament? Revelations? Revelation 2:22?

I went through an evangelical upbringing and schooling. I had to memorize ridiculous amounts of the bible to graduate high school. You know what it says. I know what it says. It's a violent book.
Anonymous
Post 11/14/2015 21:27     Subject: Are we allowed to say "Islamic terrorists"?
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Or is that islamophobic? Will this thread get whacked due to PC?


Did you call Timothy McVeigh a Christian terrorist? Do you think he represents Christianity?


Liberals do. On this forum. All the damn time.


Tim mcveigh doesn't meet the basic dictionary definition of a terrorist. Sorry libs - epic fail.
Anonymous
Post 11/14/2015 21:25     Subject: Re:Are we allowed to say "Islamic terrorists"?
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What I would like to see is good Muslims not only denouncing terrorist acts in the name of Allah but also denouncing or at least clarifying/revising the scripture verses terrorist use to justify their violence. Denouncing the motive is more meaningful than denouncing the violent act.


I propose revising the bible to remove the part about taking glee in dashing babies against rocks, and so very many others.


would that be the old testament? try reading the new.


Why? Did God change his mind between the two?


NP here, but the Old Testament was never God's final plan.


Did God tell you this over a latte' one afternoon?


Another np. Some of us just actually know a bit about the bible
Anonymous
Post 11/14/2015 21:24     Subject: Are we allowed to say "Islamic terrorists"?
Anonymous wrote:You can say it. But you sound dumb an inbreed.these fools are just terrorists.
As I understand Islam it does not encourage this nonsense.
Is Christianity were globally more popular they'd do it in the name of Jesus


I am sorry but you obvious know zero about Jesus and his teachings.

Turn the other cheek and all that.
Anonymous
Post 11/14/2015 21:22     Subject: Are we allowed to say "Islamic terrorists"?
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Jeremiah 50:20-30 is shockingly violent.

Massacres ordered by God aren't unique to Islam. Somehow, almost all Christians understand they're not supposed to go out and slaughter people. Muslims get it too.

So why not change the verses to clearly reflect that understanding?


The bible is very clear that it cannot be changed. That happens to be a commandment taken seriously. But, how many millions of Christians understand it's not right with a revision?


Which Bible are you referring to?


The Christian bible. It's the one with the book of Jeremiah.
Anonymous
Post 11/14/2015 21:03     Subject: Are we allowed to say "Islamic terrorists"?
You can say it. But you sound dumb an inbreed.these fools are just terrorists.
As I understand Islam it does not encourage this nonsense.
Is Christianity were globally more popular they'd do it in the name of Jesus
Anonymous
Post 11/14/2015 21:01     Subject: Re:Are we allowed to say "Islamic terrorists"?
Anonymous wrote:If u are interested in theology, Yale had a GREAT divinity school.


Anonymous
Post 11/14/2015 20:58     Subject: Re:Are we allowed to say "Islamic terrorists"?
If u are interested in theology, Yale had a GREAT divinity school.
Anonymous
Post 11/14/2015 20:57     Subject: Re:Are we allowed to say "Islamic terrorists"?
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What I would like to see is good Muslims not only denouncing terrorist acts in the name of Allah but also denouncing or at least clarifying/revising the scripture verses terrorist use to justify their violence. Denouncing the motive is more meaningful than denouncing the violent act.


I propose revising the bible to remove the part about taking glee in dashing babies against rocks, and so very many others.


would that be the old testament? try reading the new.


Why? Did God change his mind between the two?


NP here, but the Old Testament was never God's final plan.


Did God tell you this over a latte' one afternoon?
Anonymous
Post 11/14/2015 20:53     Subject: Re:Are we allowed to say "Islamic terrorists"?
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What I would like to see is good Muslims not only denouncing terrorist acts in the name of Allah but also denouncing or at least clarifying/revising the scripture verses terrorist use to justify their violence. Denouncing the motive is more meaningful than denouncing the violent act.


I propose revising the bible to remove the part about taking glee in dashing babies against rocks, and so very many others.


would that be the old testament? try reading the new.


Why? Did God change his mind between the two?


NP here, but the Old Testament was never God's final plan.