Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:this is why mandatory paternity tests should be the law of the land. the moment a kid is popped out, there needs to be a paternity test administered before the father is put down on the birth certificate
Will never happen, would interrupt the female gravy train.
It'll never happen because who's going to pay for it? I'm certainly not paying for paternity tests on my child when I know for certain they're my husband's. And I don't think taxpayers want to pay those bills out of their pockets.
It already costs, what, $10k out of pocket for births? I'm sure you can find an extra $100 for a mandatory paternity test.
Face facts: The paternity test isn't mandatory because it's in the government's interest to allow women to pin paternity on paying chumps.
Anonymous wrote:Wife cheated and now I wonder if our son is mine. I love him madly and would be devastated if he weren't but I have to ask the question.
I have dark brown hair and WW has black hair. OM has red headed children.
Our son was born with a full head of red hair which has darkened a little over time to light brown with red highlights.
Google not real helpful to me.
Any genetics experts out there?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Eh, my DH was duped (years before we met) by his former fiance into thinking a child was his when it actually wasn't. He got a paternity test and left. Granted the child was months old but even if it wasn't, I don't think it's fair to expect saintly acts from mere mortals. I commend women and men who are able to raise other people's children but I do think it should be a choice. When that choice is taken from you in the form of betrayal, there are casualties and unfortunately the biggest casualty is the child but don't demonize the first victim for wanting to know and possibly choosing a chance at an honest relationship without baggage or little reminders of hurt.
Well said.
He had a choice, when the wife got pregnant and the kid was born and he already suspected infidelity. He made a choice--to be a father to the kid. There's nothing "saintly" about continuing to love a child you've loved for years. There's something horrific about throwing that away.
And if his love for his son changes one iota because the kid does or does not carry his DNA, there will be baggage and hurt. It just won't be his to bear.
Pp who posted the scenario with my own DH. So let me get this straight, your wife cheats on you, gets pregnant, and dupes you into thinking you're the father of her lover's child and when it comes to light it's your fault if your feelings change "one iota" toward this child that has to be a constant reminder of betrayal? I swear DCUM is like fucking twilight zone sometimes. So should he stay with his wife if in fact he proves her infidelity? That's bullshit, I don't believe in people sacrificing happiness and staying together for their own bio kids, let alone someone else's. So if they do split, does he work doubly hard to co-parent a child that isn't his from a distance? He would have no legal rights and the child could potentially be used as an emotional/financial pawn.
And another thing, if in fact, this kid isn't the OPs, doesn't the bio father have a right to know, love, and raise his own child? No he isn't a saint for sleeping with a married woman but OP's wife also took his choice away too by passing this child off as her husband's and that's not cool either.
Anonymous wrote:The redheaded kid in True Detective turned out to be Colin Farrell's, so... obviously this is OP's kid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Eh, my DH was duped (years before we met) by his former fiance into thinking a child was his when it actually wasn't. He got a paternity test and left. Granted the child was months old but even if it wasn't, I don't think it's fair to expect saintly acts from mere mortals. I commend women and men who are able to raise other people's children but I do think it should be a choice. When that choice is taken from you in the form of betrayal, there are casualties and unfortunately the biggest casualty is the child but don't demonize the first victim for wanting to know and possibly choosing a chance at an honest relationship without baggage or little reminders of hurt.
Well said.
He had a choice, when the wife got pregnant and the kid was born and he already suspected infidelity. He made a choice--to be a father to the kid. There's nothing "saintly" about continuing to love a child you've loved for years. There's something horrific about throwing that away.
And if his love for his son changes one iota because the kid does or does not carry his DNA, there will be baggage and hurt. It just won't be his to bear.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Eh, my DH was duped (years before we met) by his former fiance into thinking a child was his when it actually wasn't. He got a paternity test and left. Granted the child was months old but even if it wasn't, I don't think it's fair to expect saintly acts from mere mortals. I commend women and men who are able to raise other people's children but I do think it should be a choice. When that choice is taken from you in the form of betrayal, there are casualties and unfortunately the biggest casualty is the child but don't demonize the first victim for wanting to know and possibly choosing a chance at an honest relationship without baggage or little reminders of hurt.
Well said.
Anonymous wrote:SHE JUST SAID SHE NEEDED A MAN TO RAISE HER SON RIGHT. What about that are you failing to understand?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:this is why mandatory paternity tests should be the law of the land. the moment a kid is popped out, there needs to be a paternity test administered before the father is put down on the birth certificate
A man can ever fully know absent a test.
You are seriously messed up. I guarantee my DH "fully" knows and has never spent a minute questioning it.
Anonymous wrote:Eh, my DH was duped (years before we met) by his former fiance into thinking a child was his when it actually wasn't. He got a paternity test and left. Granted the child was months old but even if it wasn't, I don't think it's fair to expect saintly acts from mere mortals. I commend women and men who are able to raise other people's children but I do think it should be a choice. When that choice is taken from you in the form of betrayal, there are casualties and unfortunately the biggest casualty is the child but don't demonize the first victim for wanting to know and possibly choosing a chance at an honest relationship without baggage or little reminders of hurt.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I guess you could ask for a paternity test. But if your going to stay with your wife and you love the kid, what's the point? Your the only dad he will ever know and to him you are dad.
Well, she should have thought about that before she presented someone else's child as his own.
We don't know she did. We don't even know she cheated. She denies it. He says there's "ample evidence", but we don't even know what that is.
I've never cheated on my DH, but I'm a brunette and he's dark skinned, brown eyes and black hair. DD has bright orange hair, pale skin and green eyes. We know where in my ancestry that comes from, but we have no idea how he could possibly have a recessive red in his background. Nonetheless, unless I was Rufi'd and don't know it, the baby is definitely his.
Maybe you got the wrong baby at the hospital.
Hah! Unlikely since I saw her pulled out of me.
http://www.wfaa.com/story/news/local/dallas-county/2015/09/08/dallas-family-reunited-child-after-baby-swap/71904766/
She saw her baby pulled out of her too. Just sayin'.