Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Expect more of your public servants. The idea that a teenager being kicked out of a party has a larger responsibility to behave appropriately and with respect than does a sworn officer of the law is offensive. You PPs' attempts to absolve the officer of guilt in this situation are offensive
THIS, a thousand times, every time there's a cop/idiot interaction where people blame the citizen. I expect more from trained officers.
This may be news to you, but the police are public servants of the CITIZENS, not of the CRIMINALS (petty or otherwise).
The police stopped being public servants of the teenager when she:
- trespassed property
- was part of a mob attacking a resident
- didn't comply with police requests
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
This may be news to you, but the police are public servants of the CITIZENS, not of the CRIMINALS (petty or otherwise).
The police stopped being public servants of the teenager when she:
- trespassed property
- was part of a mob attacking a resident
- didn't comply with police requests
It's also news to lawyers and the courts. The police are servants of the public, which includes everybody.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Right, because white kids have never been known to sneak into a pool. Never!!
Seriously, with the hijinks my (white, middle class) brothers got up to as teens, I shudder to think what would have happened if they were black.
You guys stormed a pool in broad daylight, cops getting called and attempted to flee? Sorry that is completely different than skinny dipping at night with a few friends at the community pool. In fact when I grew up the cops did get called on a group of high schoolers who snuck into a pool, they were arrested without incident and had to do community service. They didn't resist or mouth off when caught because they understood the repercussions.
What are you trying to say, white teen boys never do anything like this? My brothers may not have done this particular prank, but trust me they did a lot of stuff, ranging from stupidly dangerous to very illegal.
Anonymous wrote:
This may be news to you, but the police are public servants of the CITIZENS, not of the CRIMINALS (petty or otherwise).
The police stopped being public servants of the teenager when she:
- trespassed property
- was part of a mob attacking a resident
- didn't comply with police requests
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Someone FROM the neighborhood speaks but you probably won't like what you read.
https://www.facebook.com/benet.embry/posts/10152901015923202
Oh please. Scroll through the rest of his page. He's an attention whore for his radio show.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Expect more of your public servants. The idea that a teenager being kicked out of a party has a larger responsibility to behave appropriately and with respect than does a sworn officer of the law is offensive. You PPs' attempts to absolve the officer of guilt in this situation are offensive
THIS, a thousand times, every time there's a cop/idiot interaction where people blame the citizen. I expect more from trained officers.
This may be news to you, but the police are public servants of the CITIZENS, not of the CRIMINALS (petty or otherwise).
The police stopped being public servants of the teenager when she:
- trespassed property
- was part of a mob attacking a resident
- didn't comply with police requests
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Right, because white kids have never been known to sneak into a pool. Never!!
Seriously, with the hijinks my (white, middle class) brothers got up to as teens, I shudder to think what would have happened if they were black.
You guys stormed a pool in broad daylight, cops getting called and attempted to flee? Sorry that is completely different than skinny dipping at night with a few friends at the community pool. In fact when I grew up the cops did get called on a group of high schoolers who snuck into a pool, they were arrested without incident and had to do community service. They didn't resist or mouth off when caught because they understood the repercussions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So what has to happen, PPs, for you to agree that there is a problem of police brutality perpetrated against people of color in this country?
It sounds like what you guys are in search of is the "perfect victim." I don't know how you expect that to happen, because the police are not going to show up unless someone in the immediate area is perceived to be breaking the law.
Expect more of your public servants. The idea that a teenager being kicked out of a party has a larger responsibility to behave appropriately and with respect than does a sworn officer of the law is offensive. You PPs' attempts to absolve the officer of guilt in this situation are offensive.
I'm not absolving this officer of guilt. Clearly he needs a different career.
I'm also not absolving the teens of guilt for trespassing or alleviating their parents of their responsibility to raise respectful citizens.
I see 50+ kids crashing a party they weren't invited to.
I see no parents making an effort to know what their children were doing. I know what my kids post on the internet because i make it a point to. If nothing else, for their own safety. And when they say "I'm going here" I pick up the phone and verify that they are in fact going where they say they are.
How in the name of all that is holy do you know exactly how many kids were uninvited? How do you know this?
Anonymous wrote:
Expect more of your public servants. The idea that a teenager being kicked out of a party has a larger responsibility to behave appropriately and with respect than does a sworn officer of the law is offensive. You PPs' attempts to absolve the officer of guilt in this situation are offensive
THIS, a thousand times, every time there's a cop/idiot interaction where people blame the citizen. I expect more from trained officers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder if it has gotten to the point where black cops should always take the lead in responding to crimes involving blacks. Like female officers are the only ones allowed to search female suspects & often required to transport one. At least then race could be taken out of the equation since that is always the first thing anyone looks at.
Maybe black citizens that have had special training can volunteer to ride along with white cops, since there probably aren't enough black cops to response to all the calls.
??
The cops (white) were there to protect the neighbors (white) from the thugs-in-the-making (black).
Are you saying that cops should be asking for the demographic characteristics of the OFFENDERS before deciding whom to send? What if among the offenders there's a black woman, a transgender, a Jesuit priest and a Frenchman?
If you call 911 regarding an incident with another person one of the first questions they ask is, "Is the person white, hispanic, or African-American?"
That has not been my experience when calling 911, even when I witnessed an assault in a parking.lot. they have asked me to describe the suspect, after being asked to describe the emergency. I was not immediately asked the skin color of the guy performing the assault.[/quote]
I have called 911 5 times regarding altercations and every time have been asked that question. There must be a script because it is always in the same order, white, Hispanic, AA. Even if I volunteer the information when first asked "What is the nature of your emergency? " they still ask it later.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So what has to happen, PPs, for you to agree that there is a problem of police brutality perpetrated against people of color in this country?
It sounds like what you guys are in search of is the "perfect victim." I don't know how you expect that to happen, because the police are not going to show up unless someone in the immediate area is perceived to be breaking the law.
Expect more of your public servants. The idea that a teenager being kicked out of a party has a larger responsibility to behave appropriately and with respect than does a sworn officer of the law is offensive. You PPs' attempts to absolve the officer of guilt in this situation are offensive.
I'm not absolving this officer of guilt. Clearly he needs a different career.
I'm also not absolving the teens of guilt for trespassing or alleviating their parents of their responsibility to raise respectful citizens.
I see 50+ kids crashing a party they weren't invited to.
I see no parents making an effort to know what their children were doing. I know what my kids post on the internet because i make it a point to. If nothing else, for their own safety. And when they say "I'm going here" I pick up the phone and verify that they are in fact going where they say they are.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It appears to me that there issues on both sides.
Some of the black teens were uninvited guests at a private pool. The white lady and police officer behaved very badly. Both sides were wrong.
However, I didn't really see the other cops doing much of anything to diffuse the situation and I did see teens swarming all around the area. I heard them being asked by the officer to 'sit on the ground until they get to the bottom of this.' That is a reasonable request no matter what color you are. Why did they not do this? Is the officer expected to leave unruly teens swarm around and out of sight? His first priority is to defend and protect himself. Those 2 boys came at him when his back was turned. I can't hear what they may have said to provoke the reaction of him unholstering his weapon.
There are too many missing facts here to pass judgement. However calling this an act of racism is jumping the gun a tad too quickly. Not every incident involving white cops and black people is racism.
The problem is that this incident didn't happen in a vacuum. Consistently we see that incidents involving white perpetrators (college kids rioting over pumpkins in New Hampshire, Hell's Angels getting into a shootout with police a few weeks ago) are diffused without police violence, but incidents involving black perpetrators end with dead kids much more often.
So, no, we can't look into that particular officer's heart and know whether he is a racist. But he's part of an institution that consistently acts in a racist manner. You don't have to take my word for it. http://www.propublica.org/article/deadly-force-in-black-and-white?utm_source=et&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=dailynewsletter
"Young black males in recent years were at a far greater risk of being shot dead by police than their white counterparts – 21 times greater i, according to a ProPublica analysis of federally collected data on fatal police shootings."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So what has to happen, PPs, for you to agree that there is a problem of police brutality perpetrated against people of color in this country?
It sounds like what you guys are in search of is the "perfect victim." I don't know how you expect that to happen, because the police are not going to show up unless someone in the immediate area is perceived to be breaking the law.
Expect more of your public servants. The idea that a teenager being kicked out of a party has a larger responsibility to behave appropriately and with respect than does a sworn officer of the law is offensive. You PPs' attempts to absolve the officer of guilt in this situation are offensive.
I'm not absolving this officer of guilt. Clearly he needs a different career.
I'm also not absolving the teens of guilt for trespassing or alleviating their parents of their responsibility to raise respectful citizens.
I see 50+ kids crashing a party they weren't invited to.
I see no parents making an effort to know what their children were doing. I know what my kids post on the internet because i make it a point to. If nothing else, for their own safety. And when they say "I'm going here" I pick up the phone and verify that they are in fact going where they say they are.