Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:40-50k
Why? Are you serious? Why? Why not take a trip around the world?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:40-50k
Why? Are you serious? Why? Why not take a trip around the world?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1 carat diamond, 1996. 3k?
I didn't buy it, so...
Yeah, I was just wondering this. How do so many of you know how much it cost? I have no clue!
You didn't see the receipt when you took it in for an independent appraisal? Mmmmm-kay.
You took your loved one's present for an appraisal? Mmmmm-kay.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:$14,000. He paid cash.
We both owned houses, so I think the "should have been used as a down payment" argument is the stupidest thing I've ever heard. What would we have done with a third? Stop with the stupid assumptions.
I'm a PP who already had a house (and so did she) and honestly, I think the money for an expensive ring is sort of stupid. Even if you don't need a down payment, the depreciation on a new ring is instant and very very hefty. Diamonds are not scarce; the appraisals are for "replacement cost" - ie, what you would have to pay to get a new one in the artificial market. I bought my used diamond (already in a setting which I tossed) for 40% of what the same diamond alone new would have cost - from a divorced woman on CL.
These things are worth only the display and sentimental value - ostentatious, conspicuous consumption; they are in no way any kind of "investment". Anyone who still believes in their "value" should try to sell one in the secondary market. Pure marketing garbage.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:40-50k
Why? Are you serious? Why? Why not take a trip around the world?
Because we have much more to do that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:40-50k
Why? Are you serious? Why? Why not take a trip around the world?
Anonymous wrote:7000 - .5 carat tiffanys. All the money my dh had in the world and then some.
I would never "upgrade." That being said, if he had skipped the diamond and we had just done bands, that would have been fine with me too.
Anonymous wrote:$14,000. He paid cash.
We both owned houses, so I think the "should have been used as a down payment" argument is the stupidest thing I've ever heard. What would we have done with a third? Stop with the stupid assumptions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:$14,000. He paid cash.
We both owned houses, so I think the "should have been used as a down payment" argument is the stupidest thing I've ever heard. What would we have done with a third? Stop with the stupid assumptions.
Do you think that most couples getting married own two homes already?
Depends how old the couple is.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:$14,000. He paid cash.
We both owned houses, so I think the "should have been used as a down payment" argument is the stupidest thing I've ever heard. What would we have done with a third? Stop with the stupid assumptions.
Do you think that most couples getting married own two homes already?
Anonymous wrote:40-50k