Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You people are just sick saying that an infant who cannot even speak yet can possibly fathom that intercourse is happening and/or gives a shit. Grow up and to each his own, do what makes you comfortable and stay out of others business.

A 13 month old is not an infant. Mine has words and mimics much of what she sees. She is like sponge taking in everything around her. She isn't some inanimate brainless blob.

How about while she's asleep?

Let's be serious, a 13 month old who still cosleeps isn't a good sleeper. Probably wakes up 6 times a night to breastfeed only to find the boob in dad's mouth.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You people are just sick saying that an infant who cannot even speak yet can possibly fathom that intercourse is happening and/or gives a shit. Grow up and to each his own, do what makes you comfortable and stay out of others business.

A 13 month old is not an infant. Mine has words and mimics much of what she sees. She is like sponge taking in everything around her. She isn't some inanimate brainless blob.

How about while she's asleep?

Anonymous wrote:You people are just sick saying that an infant who cannot even speak yet can possibly fathom that intercourse is happening and/or gives a shit. Grow up and to each his own, do what makes you comfortable and stay out of others business.

A 13 month old is not an infant. Mine has words and mimics much of what she sees. She is like sponge taking in everything around her. She isn't some inanimate brainless blob.

Anonymous wrote:You people are just sick saying that an infant who cannot even speak yet can possibly fathom that intercourse is happening and/or gives a shit. Grow up and to each his own, do what makes you comfortable and stay out of others business.

Ahaha you are hilarious. You dont think its sick to have sex next to your child? Something is wrong with YOU!

You people are just sick saying that an infant who cannot even speak yet can possibly fathom that intercourse is happening and/or gives a shit. Grow up and to each his own, do what makes you comfortable and stay out of others business.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Get real people. Before you all had 6000sf homes, generations have been living in one room huts. Parents have been fucking in front of sleeping kids for ages.

+10000000000

Our house is small and one-level (6,000 sq ft, suuuure) and yet we still manage to have sex without our child being inches away! Amazing! How do we ever pull it off??? Oh yeah, a crib.

Come on, I don't care how fanatical you are about co-sleeping - give yourselves some privacy and let your baby sleep in peace. People live in one-room huts because they HAVE to, not because of some trendy attachment parenting trend. You have better options, so use them.

You great great grand father and mother thought it was fine to do so.

+1. Personally, it would not be so fun for me to do it with an older baby a couple of feet away, but I just don't think it's such a big deal. Not optimal, but not child abuse.
We had a large bedroom with the mattress on the floor and a small firm mat next to it where I'd nurse the baby to sleep and then roll back into my own bed. We managed.

by sleeping with, I mean having sex with

In cave man days, they might have been sleeping with their brothers or uncles too. So that is cool today then? Because the 'cavemen' or other cultures are ok with it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Get real people. Before you all had 6000sf homes, generations have been living in one room huts. Parents have been fucking in front of sleeping kids for ages.

+10000000000

Our house is small and one-level (6,000 sq ft, suuuure) and yet we still manage to have sex without our child being inches away! Amazing! How do we ever pull it off??? Oh yeah, a crib.

Come on, I don't care how fanatical you are about co-sleeping - give yourselves some privacy and let your baby sleep in peace. People live in one-room huts because they HAVE to, not because of some trendy attachment parenting trend. You have better options, so use them.

You great great grand father and mother thought it was fine to do so.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the last two PP's - your logic is clearly lacking. The point about the one room huts? Not valid to compare current society to cavemen. The point is that we as people have EVOLVED. We DON'T live in caves anymore. I am not even going to waste my time outlining it any further for you.

As for the woman that made the crude post about having sex while pregnant. Sobered up this morning and trying to back track? You are one foul mouthed thing.

No one said that pregnant women shouldn't have sex.

I stand by my original statement that it is strange, odd and creepy to have sex with a 13 month old on the same bed. For those of you that think it's fine - SMH.

This post is so ignorant and obnoxious. Both of which come up often on DCUM, but you may have taken the prize for the month PP. Do yourself a favor, get out of NW or whatever area of DMV you live in. Go somewhere where people actually make their homes and food themselves. Meet people who have more talent, skill and know-how in their little fingers than you have in your entire body or life experience. Oh, and run the "We don't live in caves anymore" comment by them, I'm sure they'll enjoy it.

Hmmmm...... I get the prize for the month? Read your post.

You must be the woman that likes to have sex with her child on the bed beside you. I do not think I have to say anything else.

Well I will say this. If in fact, you are having sex with your 13 month old child beside you something is WRONG with you and I do not care if you live here in a four square in Chevy Chase Village or in a yurt in Mexico.

Parents should not have sex in front of their children. Over and done. Anyone who thinks otherwise has a screw loose. It does not matter what age the child is.

Over and out.

I love you pp!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Get real people. Before you all had 6000sf homes, generations have been living in one room huts. Parents have been fucking in front of sleeping kids for ages.

+10000000000

Our house is small and one-level (6,000 sq ft, suuuure) and yet we still manage to have sex without our child being inches away! Amazing! How do we ever pull it off??? Oh yeah, a crib.

Come on, I don't care how fanatical you are about co-sleeping - give yourselves some privacy and let your baby sleep in peace. People live in one-room huts because they HAVE to, not because of some trendy attachment parenting trend. You have better options, so use them.

I saw a documentary about a really primitive culture in some rain forest somewhere, where they all slept in one hut together. The interviewer asked how they handled sex in front of others, and they were like, "Ph God no, we don't have sex in the hut -- we do that off by ourselves in the woods." So yeah, I doubt people have been having sex in front of others for ages.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the last two PP's - your logic is clearly lacking. The point about the one room huts? Not valid to compare current society to cavemen. The point is that we as people have EVOLVED. We DON'T live in caves anymore. I am not even going to waste my time outlining it any further for you.

As for the woman that made the crude post about having sex while pregnant. Sobered up this morning and trying to back track? You are one foul mouthed thing.

No one said that pregnant women shouldn't have sex.

I stand by my original statement that it is strange, odd and creepy to have sex with a 13 month old on the same bed. For those of you that think it's fine - SMH.

This post is so ignorant and obnoxious. Both of which come up often on DCUM, but you may have taken the prize for the month PP. Do yourself a favor, get out of NW or whatever area of DMV you live in. Go somewhere where people actually make their homes and food themselves. Meet people who have more talent, skill and know-how in their little fingers than you have in your entire body or life experience. Oh, and run the "We don't live in caves anymore" comment by them, I'm sure they'll enjoy it.

Hmmmm...... I get the prize for the month? Read your post.

You must be the woman that likes to have sex with her child on the bed beside you. I do not think I have to say anything else.

Well I will say this. If in fact, you are having sex with your 13 month old child beside you something is WRONG with you and I do not care if you live here in a four square in Chevy Chase Village or in a yurt in Mexico.

Parents should not have sex in front of their children. Over and done. Anyone who thinks otherwise has a screw loose. It does not matter what age the child is.

Over and out.

People who live in one room house have no choice. their decision to have sex with children in the room is forced by circumstance. I doubt many if given the option to live in multiple rooms would still choose to bring their children into ed while they have sex. Few here have to deal with the confines of a one room house. You have multiple rooms, multiple beds, multiple options. What makes it odd to me is to choose the option of having sex with your children in the bed with you when you have a plethora of other options. What makes someone want to have sex with their kids in bed with them rather than sex alone in bed? What does having sex with your kids in bed with you add to your sex life?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There's a movie with Diane Keaton like this where she loses custody of her (older) daughter. I forget the name, it was made in the 80s late 80s I believe.

The Good Mother.

In the book, the mother's boyfriend showers with the girl, gets an erection and lets her touch it. That's why she loses custody.

I'm more disturbed a 13 mo old is still co sleeping in parents' bed. Cut the apron strings and move the kid to his/her own crib already.