Anonymous wrote: NP here. We are currently doing college tours, and I was interested in the response of DH, a successful and pragmatic businessman with a background in management consulting. To my surprise,he was totally turned off by the prestigious university where most of the undergrad tour guides introduced themselves as business majors. In his view, no one needs four years of business classes for an entry level business job. As he put it, if you don't spend your college years learning "why Beethoven matters," you likely will never know, and you and society as a whole will be poorer as a result. He described a med school for which he consults where the Dean told him he wants students with liberal arts backgrounds because they are more complete individuals and connect with others well. DH was most impressed with the SLAC we visited. According to their published lists of what recent grads have done, plenty have gotten jobs in the financial sector. To be sure, most went for grad degrees eventually. We will be happy if our DCs go that route, but admittedly it is very expensive and makes more sense if the SLAC is well regarded.
Wow, where did you study philosophy? Because part of a good philosophical education is to be able to frame an argument and support it with evidence. This is something that a good professor makes central to his/her course. You don't just memorize what various thoughtful people said. You're supposed to be able to work with the arguments yourself and make a convincing case for them and learn to articulate them effectively. These are important skills in the workplace. If you didn't get that in your philosophy education, you were robbed.Anonymous wrote:
Not the PP, but no, philosophy doesn't "teach you how to think". There is no such thing. Philosophy teaches you about certain kinds of issues or problems (what it means to know, how we know what exists etc), and what various thoughtful people thought about these (I know because I was a philosophy major). But it's not something you can use in the workplace. There exists a 'general thinking skill' but that' is intelligence and it can not be taught - either you have it or you don't. Whatever can be taught does not transfer to other areas.
Yes, it just makes me laugh that anyone is certain about what their sixth-grader will turn out to be like. Make it through adolescence first and then tell us about it.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op, I am with the few people that agree with you.
If the reason not taking STEM majors was to avoid Calculus, how about Accounting? It is 4 year BS, practical if pass CPA.
I have been brain washing my DD since.. well.. since she was born. She is in 6th grade now and is screening which type of doctor she wants to be (currently narrowed down to radiologist and anaesthetist). She will start internship as soon as she enters high school. She loves playing piano and violin, but never come across her mind to major in Music.
Yes well, in sixth grade I was screening what kind of lawyer I wanted to be.
In high school I did science internships and won chemistry and physics awards.
I'm now a government policy analyst.
Don't pat yourself on the back about your daughters medical career too early.
Anonymous wrote: NP here. We are currently doing college tours, and I was interested in the response of DH, a successful and pragmatic businessman with a background in management consulting. To my surprise,he was totally turned off by the prestigious university where most of the undergrad tour guides introduced themselves as business majors. In his view, no one needs four years of business classes for an entry level business job. As he put it, if you don't spend your college years learning "why Beethoven matters," you likely will never know, and you and society as a whole will be poorer as a result. He described a med school for which he consults where the Dean told him he wants students with liberal arts backgrounds because they are more complete individuals and connect with others well. DH was most impressed with the SLAC we visited. According to their published lists of what recent grads have done, plenty have gotten jobs in the financial sector. To be sure, most went for grad degrees eventually. We will be happy if our DCs go that route, but admittedly it is very expensive and makes more sense if the SLAC is well regarded.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My history major son is in the financial sector in NYC and making enough money for an apartment in Soho - no roommates. Younger son, an English major, is in the financial sector in this area. He graduated last year. I think they've been able to land jobs because they work hard, they believe in themselves and developed excellent writing and critical thinking skills through the liberal arts. And part of them believing in themselves is that their parents do too.
I feel sorry for OPs son. Having parents who don't believe in you is a real strike against you.
Good for your sons, but if someone wanted to work in the finance sector, why not just major in finance? That seems like much less of a gamble than majoring in Dnglish/History and expecting to work in the finance sector. I mean, if someone wants to work in the fields of history or English then great, major in history or English, but why major in them if you don't? Not sure I understand the point of your point.
Because finance can be learned on the job, or you can have the company pay for your MBA, which is how the investment banks have been doing it for years. They want sharp, educated people who can appreciate the world, the arts, sciences and literature, not just one-dimensional number crunchers.
This is not true unless you went to an IVY or a very high ranked school. And it's usually only true for Investment Banking which is overwhelmingly a sales job and has very little to do with actual finance work.
The majority of corporate finance/accounting jobs require a finance/accounting degree. My company specifies that an ideal candidate has a finance or accounting degree and three years as an analyst.
Anonymous wrote:Op, I am with the few people that agree with you.
If the reason not taking STEM majors was to avoid Calculus, how about Accounting? It is 4 year BS, practical if pass CPA.
I have been brain washing my DD since.. well.. since she was born. She is in 6th grade now and is screening which type of doctor she wants to be (currently narrowed down to radiologist and anaesthetist). She will start internship as soon as she enters high school. She loves playing piano and violin, but never come across her mind to major in Music.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op, I am with the few people that agree with you.
If the reason not taking STEM majors was to avoid Calculus, how about Accounting? It is 4 year BS, practical if pass CPA.
I have been brain washing my DD since.. well.. since she was born. She is in 6th grade now and is screening which type of doctor she wants to be (currently narrowed down to radiologist and anaesthetist). She will start internship as soon as she enters high school. She loves playing piano and violin, but never come across her mind to major in Music.
This is a recipe for disaster. And the parents who push their kids to take practical majors are often doing them a disservice. Years ago, I majored in accounting instead of English because it was "practical." I was good at math, yada, yada. Problem was I was miserable as an CPA. I mean barely able to get out of bed miserable. Ultimately, I learned my lesson and changed careers. I've been a much happier and more successful writer for the past 25 years.
I tell my kids to find something they love and work hard. The rest will take care of itself. I get that we're all worried about our children getting jobs, but I think we're kidding ourselves if we think steering or forcing them into a marketable major is the answer. Someone who doesn't like STEM isn't going to go far no matter what their aptitude. The same for an artist or musician jammed onto a business track.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My history major son is in the financial sector in NYC and making enough money for an apartment in Soho - no roommates. Younger son, an English major, is in the financial sector in this area. He graduated last year. I think they've been able to land jobs because they work hard, they believe in themselves and developed excellent writing and critical thinking skills through the liberal arts. And part of them believing in themselves is that their parents do too.
I feel sorry for OPs son. Having parents who don't believe in you is a real strike against you.
Good for your sons, but if someone wanted to work in the finance sector, why not just major in finance? That seems like much less of a gamble than majoring in Dnglish/History and expecting to work in the finance sector. I mean, if someone wants to work in the fields of history or English then great, major in history or English, but why major in them if you don't? Not sure I understand the point of your point.
Because finance can be learned on the job, or you can have the company pay for your MBA, which is how the investment banks have been doing it for years. They want sharp, educated people who can appreciate the world, the arts, sciences and literature, not just one-dimensional number crunchers.
Anonymous wrote:Op, I am with the few people that agree with you.
If the reason not taking STEM majors was to avoid Calculus, how about Accounting? It is 4 year BS, practical if pass CPA.
I have been brain washing my DD since.. well.. since she was born. She is in 6th grade now and is screening which type of doctor she wants to be (currently narrowed down to radiologist and anaesthetist). She will start internship as soon as she enters high school. She loves playing piano and violin, but never come across her mind to major in Music.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My history major son is in the financial sector in NYC and making enough money for an apartment in Soho - no roommates. Younger son, an English major, is in the financial sector in this area. He graduated last year. I think they've been able to land jobs because they work hard, they believe in themselves and developed excellent writing and critical thinking skills through the liberal arts. And part of them believing in themselves is that their parents do too.
I feel sorry for OPs son. Having parents who don't believe in you is a real strike against you.
Good for your sons, but if someone wanted to work in the finance sector, why not just major in finance? That seems like much less of a gamble than majoring in Dnglish/History and expecting to work in the finance sector. I mean, if someone wants to work in the fields of history or English then great, major in history or English, but why major in them if you don't? Not sure I understand the point of your point.
Because finance can be learned on the job, or you can have the company pay for your MBA, which is how the investment banks have been doing it for years. They want sharp, educated people who can appreciate the world, the arts, sciences and literature, not just one-dimensional number crunchers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op, I am with the few people that agree with you.
If the reason not taking STEM majors was to avoid Calculus, how about Accounting? It is 4 year BS, practical if pass CPA.
I have been brain washing my DD since.. well.. since she was born. She is in 6th grade now and is screening which type of doctor she wants to be (currently narrowed down to radiologist and anaesthetist). She will start internship as soon as she enters high school. She loves playing piano and violin, but never come across her mind to major in Music.
This is a recipe for disaster. And the parents who push their kids to take practical majors are often doing them a disservice. Years ago, I majored in accounting instead of English because it was "practical." I was good at math, yada, yada. Problem was I was miserable as an CPA. I mean barely able to get out of bed miserable. Ultimately, I learned my lesson and changed careers. I've been a much happier and more successful writer for the past 25 years.
I tell my kids to find something they love and work hard. The rest will take care of itself. I get that we're all worried about our children getting jobs, but I think we're kidding ourselves if we think steering or forcing them into a marketable major is the answer. Someone who doesn't like STEM isn't going to go far no matter what their aptitude. The same for an artist or musician jammed onto a business track.
Anonymous wrote:Op, I am with the few people that agree with you.
If the reason not taking STEM majors was to avoid Calculus, how about Accounting? It is 4 year BS, practical if pass CPA.
I have been brain washing my DD since.. well.. since she was born. She is in 6th grade now and is screening which type of doctor she wants to be (currently narrowed down to radiologist and anaesthetist). She will start internship as soon as she enters high school. She loves playing piano and violin, but never come across her mind to major in Music.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My history major son is in the financial sector in NYC and making enough money for an apartment in Soho - no roommates. Younger son, an English major, is in the financial sector in this area. He graduated last year. I think they've been able to land jobs because they work hard, they believe in themselves and developed excellent writing and critical thinking skills through the liberal arts. And part of them believing in themselves is that their parents do too.
I feel sorry for OPs son. Having parents who don't believe in you is a real strike against you.
Good for your sons, but if someone wanted to work in the finance sector, why not just major in finance? That seems like much less of a gamble than majoring in Dnglish/History and expecting to work in the finance sector. I mean, if someone wants to work in the fields of history or English then great, major in history or English, but why major in them if you don't? Not sure I understand the point of your point.