Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread should win -- most misleading title...
I read the story and don't see what is misleading about the title of the thread.
My take-away for what it's worth is the mom and daughter wanted to stick it to TJ (who tipped the Post to the story?).
How is going to USC at 16 sticking it to TJ or grads who will go onto better schools?
Obviously they wanted the world to know that although TJ rejected her, it's their loss -- accepted at age 16 into a good University program (USC ranked 25 by U.S. News and World Report) and it's being paid for by a scholarship and grants. Still gotta wonder how the Post got wind of this in the first place. Also, when you say "better," if you live in L.A. there's no better alumni network.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread should win -- most misleading title...
I read the story and don't see what is misleading about the title of the thread.
My take-away for what it's worth is the mom and daughter wanted to stick it to TJ (who tipped the Post to the story?).
How is going to USC at 16 sticking it to TJ or grads who will go onto better schools?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread should win -- most misleading title...
I read the story and don't see what is misleading about the title of the thread.
My take-away for what it's worth is the mom and daughter wanted to stick it to TJ (who tipped the Post to the story?).
Anonymous wrote:This thread should win -- most misleading title...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread should win -- most misleading title...
The title of this thread was trying to say: Marshall srudent is better than TJ student.
Lolz tj srudent good at math not english
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread should win -- most misleading title...
The title of this thread was trying to say: Marshall srudent is better than TJ student.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread should win -- most misleading title...
The title of this thread was trying to say: Marshall srudent is better than TJ student.
Anonymous wrote:This thread should win -- most misleading title...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:. . . you are mistaken if you believe McLean is "almost exclusively white." . . . some parts of McLean have up to a 40% minority population.Anonymous wrote:
I was following a recent thread in the VA Public Schools forum schools that discussed diversity in FFC. If you are looking for a diverse community, McLean is a multi-ethnic and diverse city in Fairfax County according to the posters in that thread (quoted above).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread should win -- most misleading title...
I think if you collapsed the thread it would be:
- Local girl at Marshall gets into USC at 16;
- Oh really, isn't USC dangerous?
- Yes, no, maybe (depends on how high the gates are)
- Former McLean resident now in LA: LA is diverse and Fairfax County is white bread
- Current Fairfax County residents: we're pretty diverse now, too, just safer than South Central LA
- Oh really, where's the diversity? Certainly not in McLean.
- No, McLean's getting more diverse, too.
- Prove it.
Has the girl graduated from USC yet?
Thanks, now I don't have to plow through the whole thing.Anonymous wrote:This thread should win -- most misleading title...