Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Okay, OP has disappeared, so it's time for this thread to die. Let it go people!
I'm still here. Not sure what I am supposed to say to defend myself at this point. I had no idea the thread would turn into this.
Don't play victim. You don't need to defend yourself, you just need to recognize your twisted thinking.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't understand you people. It is ok to cut off foreskin (for non religious reasons) and forcibly puncture infant's ears, but a little lemon juice in their hair means you are not happy with how they look?
I think there is a big difference with doing thing for cultural and religious reasons vs. doing it because you think your child is not pretty enough with her brown hair.
PP said for non-religious reasons. Plenty of people circumcise so DS can look like daddy.
So does the American Academy of Pediatricans also recommend that you put lemon juice in a child's hair to make them look more Aryan?
Please read precisely. AAP does not recommend routine circumcision for all newborn boys. They only say the health benefits, in their view, are great enough to warrant insurance coverage. (NB that the health benefits of circumcision are questionable enough for European countries to advocate against its routine performance.)
Obviously, highlighting hair does not have any health benefits. However, in circumcision debates (not looking to start one here), proponents often say they did it because daddy was circumcised, too. Those people's actions then are comparable to OP's.
You anti-circ people are like a dog with a damn bone, aren't you? LET. IT. GO. Not every thread has to turn into a debate on this topic.
No. As long as children are needlessly mutilated, I will speak up about it when the topic arises (I was not the PP who first brought it up). No matter how much you yell.
I circumcised my child and would do it again if I had a boy. Yell away. . .you won't change my mind. It's a personal choice, and one that is perfectly medically acceptable. I think I'll take the advice of my doctor over some sanctimonious random person on the internet offering me asinine unsolicited advice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Okay, OP has disappeared, so it's time for this thread to die. Let it go people!
I'm still here. Not sure what I am supposed to say to defend myself at this point. I had no idea the thread would turn into this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Okay, OP has disappeared, so it's time for this thread to die. Let it go people!
I'm still here. Not sure what I am supposed to say to defend myself at this point. I had no idea the thread would turn into this.
Anonymous wrote:Cruel and unrelated. I am not starving my daughter and would never think of allowing her to even diet.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Absolutely because of the hair thing. Mom should be the LAST one you expect to hear "you don't look good enough because..." from. So yes. Because of the hair thing..
OP only eats 500 calories per day. My guess is that will do far more damage than wanting to highlight her daughter's hair.
Cruel and unrelated. I am not starving my daughter and would never think of allowing her to even diet.
Anonymous wrote:Okay, OP has disappeared, so it's time for this thread to die. Let it go people!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Absolutely because of the hair thing. Mom should be the LAST one you expect to hear "you don't look good enough because..." from. So yes. Because of the hair thing..
OP only eats 500 calories per day. My guess is that will do far more damage than wanting to highlight her daughter's hair.
Anonymous wrote:Absolutely because of the hair thing. Mom should be the LAST one you expect to hear "you don't look good enough because..." from. So yes. Because of the hair thing..