Anonymous wrote:PP, what school do you send your child to? What are the kinds of increases you are seeing?
I ask b/c I am seeing b/t 3-4% increase annually at a Big 3 and I would love to know what others are seeing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Your question is intrusive, the answer is irrelevant to the point, again you fall back on personal attacks. Suffice it to say, that yearly uition hikes are pricing out the mc and umc and, worse, stressing the families who are trying to hold on. Your efforts to attack me personally will not distract me.
So just tell us what tuition was at your child's school for the past 6 years. That way, we all can see how big the hikes you're facing really are. You say tuition doubled in the past six years; I'd like to see the numbers.
Your refusal to provide info is baffling to me.
You are baiting.
Which is weird behavior since you do not have a child in private school and so the price gushing does not affect you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: Suffice it to say, that yearly uition hikes are pricing out the mc and umc and, worse, stressing the families who are trying to hold on. .
This is the most important part of this thread to me. We are upper middle class but have not had raises in 3-4 years. Meanwhile tuition goes up annually. I just wish the boards and admin of our DC's school would tighten their belts instead of hitting us up again. [/quote
My point exactly
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Your question is intrusive, the answer is irrelevant to the point, again you fall back on personal attacks. Suffice it to say, that yearly uition hikes are pricing out the mc and umc and, worse, stressing the families who are trying to hold on. Your efforts to attack me personally will not distract me.
So just tell us what tuition was at your child's school for the past 6 years. That way, we all can see how big the hikes you're facing really are. You say tuition doubled in the past six years; I'd like to see the numbers.
Your refusal to provide info is baffling to me.
Anonymous wrote: Suffice it to say, that yearly uition hikes are pricing out the mc and umc and, worse, stressing the families who are trying to hold on. .
Anonymous wrote:Your question is intrusive, the answer is irrelevant to the point, again you fall back on personal attacks. Suffice it to say, that yearly uition hikes are pricing out the mc and umc and, worse, stressing the families who are trying to hold on. Your efforts to attack me personally will not distract me.
Anonymous wrote:PP, you do NOT have a kid in private so you have NO IDEA the kind of strain this ever sky rocketing hiking of tuition is causing family's who do. Take your egoism elsewhere.
Anonymous wrote:OK, I got bored enough to actually research some of the tuition claims being made here. I focused on Sidwell because it's the most high profile school, and so easiest to find information for. Here's what I found ...
Anonymous wrote:... this year every school hiked tuition 4-6 % again, just like they did the year before and the year before , and the year before. ...
False. Here are actual Sidwell tuition figures for 2008-2014, with the % increase over each prior year.
2008-09 $29,442
2009-10 $30,842 4.76%
2010-11 $32,069 3.98%
2011-12 $32,960 2.78%
2012-13 $34,268 3.97%
2013-14 $35,228 2.80%
I guess PP was correct 1 out 5 times. A more accurate -- but less exciting -- statement would be "Sidwell hiked tuition 2-4% for the last four years!" But PP seems to have doubled the rate of tuition increase.
Anonymous wrote:... these figures are based on LAST YEARS Tuition, and next year it will be $2,000- $3,000 more at every school. ...
False. As revealed by the data above, Sidwell's tuition is increasing by $960 next year, not $2,000-3,000. PP seems to have tripled the rate of tuition increase.
Anonymous wrote:seriously, why has tuition quintupled in last 20 years and doubled in the last 6 years? ...
False and false. Over the last 6 years, Sidwell's tuition did not double. It increased $5,786, a 19.7% increase. Here, PP quintupled the rate of increase (19.7% versus 100%). Over the past 20 years, Sidwell's tuition did not quintuple. Sidwell tuition for 1992-93 was $10,885. Compared to the 2012-13 tuition (20 years later), that's a little more than double, and certainly not quintuple.
These tuition costs are incredibly high, and it's a legitimate conversation to discuss whether they're justified. However, PP has continuously exaggerated and falsified the rate of increase, which prevents any meaningful conversation from occurring. I hope this data can help advance the conversation.
Sam2
Anonymous wrote:Private schools compete by offering progressively more expensive "services" which go far beyond providing a solid college preparation. You are paying for those "services" like multiple sports teams, performing arts course, travel budgets to exotic places, etc. These schools become a status symbol and less a cost effective place to prepare the students for college.
My son went to a prep school in NJ that cost less than $15K/year and a third of the class went to the top 2% colleges. Sports were bare bones and the curriculum focused on non exotic subjects matter and small classes.
Parents here did not want to pay extra for the bourgeois acoutrements only for the important academics.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FWIW, Sidwell's tuition for 2013-14 is $35,228. That's an increase of $960 (2.8%) from this year's tuition of $34,268. Still a lot of money, but not even close to the 4-6% increase someone keeps claiming here.
Thanks, the more specifics the better in this discussion!