Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This film is powerful indictment of the Rhee/Henderson leadership.
Incredibly dedicated and caring faculty. Terrific principal. The problem? DCPS. This is a school system that has no idea what education is supposed to be. Education is opportunity to learn. It's not test scores or other metrics.
DC Met needed books, computers, a science lab. Additional staff to deal with the truancy and social problems of it's students. Did you see the scene of that wonderfully talented music teacher loading up a U-Haul trailer full of instruments he personally provided? And DCPS forced them to excess him?
Shame on you, DCPS, for not supporting this school and this principal.
It was Rhee who was trying to fix the shocking problems at Central Office of schools not having books and other materials they desperately needed. It was the prior DCPS administration that put that do-nothing, give-nothing infrastructure in place.
Correct -- Rhee/Henderson are not the only ineffective school leaders DCPS has ever seen, just the most recent ones -- and the worst ones in my opinion, because they had so much more authority, via mayoral control, than their predecessors, and they still made a mess of things.
How good is it that the books are delivered on time, if kids still can't read what's in them?
What books, they may not be in the warehouse any more but there not in the classroom either. Discouraged from using textbooks, teachers write their own curriculum folks, we still don't have a comprehensive one. Standards yes (Common Core) - curriculum NO!!!!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This film is powerful indictment of the Rhee/Henderson leadership.
Incredibly dedicated and caring faculty. Terrific principal. The problem? DCPS. This is a school system that has no idea what education is supposed to be. Education is opportunity to learn. It's not test scores or other metrics.
DC Met needed books, computers, a science lab. Additional staff to deal with the truancy and social problems of it's students. Did you see the scene of that wonderfully talented music teacher loading up a U-Haul trailer full of instruments he personally provided? And DCPS forced them to excess him?
Shame on you, DCPS, for not supporting this school and this principal.
It was Rhee who was trying to fix the shocking problems at Central Office of schools not having books and other materials they desperately needed. It was the prior DCPS administration that put that do-nothing, give-nothing infrastructure in place.
Correct -- Rhee/Henderson are not the only ineffective school leaders DCPS has ever seen, just the most recent ones -- and the worst ones in my opinion, because they had so much more authority, via mayoral control, than their predecessors, and they still made a mess of things.
How good is it that the books are delivered on time, if kids still can't read what's in them?
What books, they may not be in the warehouse any more but there not in the classroom either. Discouraged from using textbooks, teachers write their own curriculum folks, we still don't have a comprehensive one. Standards yes (Common Core) - curriculum NO!!!!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This film is powerful indictment of the Rhee/Henderson leadership.
Incredibly dedicated and caring faculty. Terrific principal. The problem? DCPS. This is a school system that has no idea what education is supposed to be. Education is opportunity to learn. It's not test scores or other metrics.
DC Met needed books, computers, a science lab. Additional staff to deal with the truancy and social problems of it's students. Did you see the scene of that wonderfully talented music teacher loading up a U-Haul trailer full of instruments he personally provided? And DCPS forced them to excess him?
Shame on you, DCPS, for not supporting this school and this principal.
It was Rhee who was trying to fix the shocking problems at Central Office of schools not having books and other materials they desperately needed. It was the prior DCPS administration that put that do-nothing, give-nothing infrastructure in place.
Correct -- Rhee/Henderson are not the only ineffective school leaders DCPS has ever seen, just the most recent ones -- and the worst ones in my opinion, because they had so much more authority, via mayoral control, than their predecessors, and they still made a mess of things.
How good is it that the books are delivered on time, if kids still can't read what's in them?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This film is powerful indictment of the Rhee/Henderson leadership.
Incredibly dedicated and caring faculty. Terrific principal. The problem? DCPS. This is a school system that has no idea what education is supposed to be. Education is opportunity to learn. It's not test scores or other metrics.
DC Met needed books, computers, a science lab. Additional staff to deal with the truancy and social problems of it's students. Did you see the scene of that wonderfully talented music teacher loading up a U-Haul trailer full of instruments he personally provided? And DCPS forced them to excess him?
Shame on you, DCPS, for not supporting this school and this principal.
It was Rhee who was trying to fix the shocking problems at Central Office of schools not having books and other materials they desperately needed. It was the prior DCPS administration that put that do-nothing, give-nothing infrastructure in place.
Anonymous wrote:Impact isn't magic. You can be minimally effective and keep your job for a while. Dc has a hard enough time getting teachers to stay and to stay in high needs schools. And in any case there's very few first year teachers who can be highly effective in one or two years. Meanwhile dc excesses/burns out plenty of quality educators.
Anonymous wrote:This film is powerful indictment of the Rhee/Henderson leadership.
Incredibly dedicated and caring faculty. Terrific principal. The problem? DCPS. This is a school system that has no idea what education is supposed to be. Education is opportunity to learn. It's not test scores or other metrics.
DC Met needed books, computers, a science lab. Additional staff to deal with the truancy and social problems of it's students. Did you see the scene of that wonderfully talented music teacher loading up a U-Haul trailer full of instruments he personally provided? And DCPS forced them to excess him?
Shame on you, DCPS, for not supporting this school and this principal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There's two sides to the coin - If there are kids who are a repeat behavior problem from class to class, regardless of teacher, it is that student who is the problem and addressing the student's bad behavior is where focus needs to be.
But at the same time, if teachers have inadequate classroom management skills, that's certainly also a huge problem - check for example YouTube for videos with teachers displaying completely ineffective or even completely inappropriate behavior - some teachers really really don't know how to manage students and classrooms effectively, and that's something that the school administration needs to diagnose and deal with effectively as well.
And with their zillion dollar IMPACT evaluation system, DCPS has surely gotten rid of all the teachers with poor classroom mgt skills.
What's your solution? Poor classroom management continues, and there are still lousy teachers. Rather than whining about IMPACT, or saying "get rid of IMPACT" the answer needs to be "what do we replace it with?" So... what is your answer?
One of great ironies of IMPACT is that many very good teachers who do a heroic job every day are being branded as minimally effective while some truly mediocre teachers who do very little have been labelled highly effective and given bonuses.
By what objective, quantifiable, independently verifiable measures were they so heroic or mediocre?
Anonymous wrote:
We should just keep firing DCPS leadership until gentrification reduces District poverty to the point where the public school system can actually function. Then we'll raise whoever's lucky enough to be sitting in the Chancellor's chair up on our shoulders and carry them around in a victory lap.
Anonymous wrote:I enjoyed the documentary, and definitely had a positive impression of the teachers. The one thing I noticed was how casually they dressed. On the one hand, I thought they were deliberately wearing college t-shirts from their alma maters to encourage the student. On the other hand, it just seemed really unprofessional to teach a class or come to a staff meeting in t shirt or sweatshirt. I don't remember any of my teachers growing up dressed so casually!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Definitely consider whether the teacher is working in a high needs demographic.
Where a teacher is working is separate from how heroic or mediocre a teacher actually is.
You haven't watched the film. Watch it. You might just get it.
I saw Part I but wasn't impressed. Maybe there's some magic in Part II that I missed.
But what are you saying about whether where they teach matters? That even lousy teachers should be considered heroes and get kudos and accolades just for teaching in a challenging district?
Not saying that. But the job that teachers do in high needs schools is much more difficult. And that should be considered when evaluating teachers.