Anonymous wrote:"It kills the liberals running this program that they have not found an arguably equitable way to cram those disadvantaged kids into the program."
Nice work. As if AAP is not devisive enough, let's inject liberal/conservative politics into the matter.
Anonymous wrote:Why not? We all know Janie Strauss doesn't mind overcrowding the Cluster 1 schools in favor of the "disadvantaged" FCPS because the parents won't let their kid "slip through the cracks"-never mind that we pay triple or more the property taxes to live in the school district to begin with.....liberals love that one!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Seriously, you are all focusing on the age. The fact that FCPS "locally normed" the test was not based on age. What they have done is grouped the schools based on heterogenous factors and then set up a percentile ranking based on that group of students. So, if your child is in a high-performing school, your child's percentile will drop. The net effect of this is that every school will provide the same percentage of kids into the pool. The reason that you're not getting a raw score is because FCPS doesn't want you to know that your child's score of "132" is judged as lower than a "122" in another school because your locally normed 95% is "134" while the other school's locally normed 95% is "120". It's a mean to expand the pool of candidates, adjusting for socio-economic factors - not age!
LOL. Nice troll.
Anonymous wrote:Seriously, you are all focusing on the age. The fact that FCPS "locally normed" the test was not based on age. What they have done is grouped the schools based on heterogenous factors and then set up a percentile ranking based on that group of students. So, if your child is in a high-performing school, your child's percentile will drop. The net effect of this is that every school will provide the same percentage of kids into the pool. The reason that you're not getting a raw score is because FCPS doesn't want you to know that your child's score of "132" is judged as lower than a "122" in another school because your locally normed 95% is "134" while the other school's locally normed 95% is "120". It's a mean to expand the pool of candidates, adjusting for socio-economic factors - not age!
Anonymous wrote:Interesting. I know this won't be a popular argument here, but I could see the argument that "marginal" kids from lower performing schools need AAP more than "marginal" kids from high performing schools.
For example, take a kid who scores 130. A kid at a school where 130 is one of the highest scores in the school is probably not going to be challenged at the base school, whereas a kid who scores 130 and there are 20 kids who scored higher (and presumably a bunch right around 130 and just below that probably wouldn't go either), probably will be challenged because he will have more of a cohort at the base school.
I could see FCPS, as a policy matter, deciding that they will give an advantage to kids from the lower performing school because they don't have as much opportunity at their home school. In lower income schools, the PTA doesn't raise as much money so they won't have as many of the extras, etc.
Like I said, I'm sure people here would hate the idea, but I could see it happening.
Anonymous wrote:Seriously, you are all focusing on the age. The fact that FCPS "locally normed" the test was not based on age. What they have done is grouped the schools based on heterogenous factors and then set up a percentile ranking based on that group of students. So, if your child is in a high-performing school, your child's percentile will drop. The net effect of this is that every school will provide the same percentage of kids into the pool. The reason that you're not getting a raw score is because FCPS doesn't want you to know that your child's score of "132" is judged as lower than a "122" in another school because your locally normed 95% is "134" while the other school's locally normed 95% is "120". It's a mean to expand the pool of candidates, adjusting for socio-economic factors - not age!
Anonymous wrote:Seriously, you are all focusing on the age. The fact that FCPS "locally normed" the test was not based on age. What they have done is grouped the schools based on heterogenous factors and then set up a percentile ranking based on that group of students. So, if your child is in a high-performing school, your child's percentile will drop. The net effect of this is that every school will provide the same percentage of kids into the pool. The reason that you're not getting a raw score is because FCPS doesn't want you to know that your child's score of "132" is judged as lower than a "122" in another school because your locally normed 95% is "134" while the other school's locally normed 95% is "120". It's a mean to expand the pool of candidates, adjusting for socio-economic factors - not age!