Anonymous wrote:
Apparently there was a red brick sale or perhaps the owners are in the brick industry

Now now, be fair: There are bricks AND brick-colored pavers.

I am assuming the builder shit a brick. Or a ton of 'em.

Anonymous wrote:
on Yorktown Blvd in Arlington

Apparently there was a red brick sale or perhaps the owners are in the brick industry

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is interesting.

Whoever posted this has picked up on a few elements of a typical mcmansion, but then posted a picture of the source of those elements!

This house is lovely. Wouldn't change a thing.

This is one ugly ass old mcmansion

+1

No, this is a 3-4 bedroom home from 1932. This is where your grandparents lived.

antique mcmansion! looks like the roof will rot away any day now shotty work

on Yorktown Blvd in Arlington

Anonymous wrote:

Haha, love this!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is interesting.

Whoever posted this has picked up on a few elements of a typical mcmansion, but then posted a picture of the source of those elements!

This house is lovely. Wouldn't change a thing.

This is one ugly ass old mcmansion

+1

No, this is a 3-4 bedroom home from 1932. This is where your grandparents lived.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is interesting.

Whoever posted this has picked up on a few elements of a typical mcmansion, but then posted a picture of the source of those elements!

This house is lovely. Wouldn't change a thing.

This is one ugly ass old mcmansion

+1

It's not entirely on Street Maps, but the beginning of the neighborhood is:

http://goo.gl/maps/9VxLt

I drive past it every day from Wilson Lane. Notice how close each house it. I think you can reach from one kitchen to the other to borrow a cup of sugar.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

We have a winner!

Definitely the winner!

+1

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is interesting.

Whoever posted this has picked up on a few elements of a typical mcmansion, but then posted a picture of the source of those elements!

This house is lovely. Wouldn't change a thing.

This is one ugly ass old mcmansion

If you still haven't understood the definition of McMansion, your opinion is worthless in this thread. Perhaps you'd be more comfortable on the claw clips thread.

Anonymous wrote:Anyone who can't understand why 00:15 is a McMansion but 23:17 is not, should not be commenting on this thread. Rather, they should be reading and trying to understand.

+1. I think whoever posted 23:17 was having an argument with someone else in an "Arlington vs Kent" thread and posted it to try to score a point.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

We have a winner!

Definitely the winner!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is interesting.

Whoever posted this has picked up on a few elements of a typical mcmansion, but then posted a picture of the source of those elements!

This house is lovely. Wouldn't change a thing.

This is one ugly ass old mcmansion

Do historic parts of Leesburg and Frederick pass muster here, or does a historic house have to be inside the Beltway to be housing police approved?