Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have no reason to think she's not a lovely person, but objecting to her self-presentation is not denying her her loveliness.
Maybe if she recast herself as someone trying to preserve some of the elements of the parenting she grew up with? A lot of what she does looks familiar; my mother did it and I do it. (We also sock away money like no one's business.)
That's not a bad idea. Or, maybe something linked to Depression-era values would resonate in this era of bad economies and concern about over-consumption.
Anonymous wrote:I have no reason to think she's not a lovely person, but objecting to her self-presentation is not denying her her loveliness.
Maybe if she recast herself as someone trying to preserve some of the elements of the parenting she grew up with? A lot of what she does looks familiar; my mother did it and I do it. (We also sock away money like no one's business.)
Anonymous wrote:I know her too and she is lovely. I really hope she doesn't read DCUM, I feel so bad about how she is getting ripped apart and undoubtedly never saw it coming.
While I actually don't agree with a number of the criticisms posted about this woman, she has chosen to put herself out in the public eye by agreeing to be the subject of the article. As a result of that, she has to accept that people are going to have opinions on her, and express them.
I know her too and she is lovely. I really hope she doesn't read DCUM, I feel so bad about how she is getting ripped apart and undoubtedly never saw it coming.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I actually know her and she is quite nice. For whatever that is worth.
It's worth nothing with these posters. They would tear Mother Theresa down on these boards in a NY Minute if she were still alive.
I know her too and she is lovely. I really hope she doesn't read DCUM, I feel so bad about how she is getting ripped apart and undoubtedly never saw it coming.
It's really not personal. Sigh. If we don't even know her, why would she take it personally? Honestly, maybe she could learn a thing or two if she could read it and just take away the ideas, and not take it personally.
She is not anonymous and the criticism is being directed at her, seems like she is being personally attacked to me.
Anonymous wrote:When someone who is 42 yo, with 4 kids and an expensive home that has just been decorated using a professional decorator, but who has no retirement savings self-righteously declares, "Some of us live within our budget and some don't" . . . well, you reap what you sow.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I feel like the constructive thing would be to help her recast her blog. It's interesting and beautifully presented. It's just that with her rising HHI and the expensive house, she's no longer (although she probably once was) in the penny-pinching demographic. Maybe the blog just needs to evolve a bit, to make it clear that she's targeting the "income under $250K in DC" crowd rather than the shoe-string budget crowd.
pp here. Warren Buffet has a BILLION dollars and people consider him frugal. But, then again, guys generally don't tear each other down.
Does Warren Buffet have a blog on how to live frugally? No, I don't believe he does.
Gosh, so many of you are missing the problem here. Is there a lack of critical thinkers on here today (and yesterday)?
Instead of posting a snide remark in retort, I will elaborate...If Frugal Mama has a $2m in family money then perhaps she IS frugal. Because she doesn't explain her finances, we don't know. Maybe she doesn't have retirement savings because they are going to inherit gobs of money. And, for all the people on these boards going into DEBT to pay for private school, I disagree with the pp's who said that public school is a given of frugality. People of any HHI can be frugal. If you would like to express your difference in thinking, please do so.
Yes, my difference of opinion is this: if FM considers herself frugal for her bank account set, please set up a blog for that type of readership. Please do not call herself frugal, b/c as another PP poster said up above, she is not frugal in the penny-pinching way. That is all. However, she, and the WaPo article, appeared to suggest that she is a penny-pinching mama, and this is not the case. Therefore, in comparing herself to WB,this is not accurate b/c WB does not have a blog on how to life frugally for his lifestyle.
I don't think "frugal" equated penny pinching. If you read, dollar stretcher, that is penny pinching as the name suggests. There are blogs/books on how to reuse tin foil. I think Frugal Mama is trying to cultivate her own demographic. You can google "frugal" and Warren Buffet and hundreds of links come up.