Anonymous wrote:OP here.
I agree that Kate’s dress was pretty, and I wish I looked half as great at my wedding. But my point is that, this is a public occasion and it seems to lack that flair. Kate’s dress looked limp. It could have used more oomph, fullness, whatever. While Princess Diana’s gown looks dated now, it had that fairy-tale element. It was sensational. I will always remember it.
Anonymous wrote:The Middleton kids DO look old. Even my dad was telling my mom (50's) that Kate looks older than her. Now he was exaggerating but she definitely looks way old. Maybe it's her whole "look" or that she wears too much eyeliner underneath her eyes. Or she just needs to gain 5lbs and plump out those cheeks a bit.
Anonymous wrote:The Middleton kids DO look old. Even my dad was telling my mom (50's) that Kate looks older than her. Now he was exaggerating but she definitely looks way old. Maybe it's her whole "look" or that she wears too much eyeliner underneath her eyes. Or she just needs to gain 5lbs and plump out those cheeks a bit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
And, well, they should have been. They are 5th and 6th in line to the throne and whatever else Sarah Ferguson has done, she has done a good job in rearing her children, which is better than one can say for the Queen, Charles, Andrew, and Anne, who rumor has it that she is having an affair with Camilla's ex.
Andrew is their dad and Fergie's ex.
Anonymous wrote:Here's the evening wear...I really like both dresses:
![]()
Anonymous wrote:I liked her reception dress better.... But I'm curious as to why the sister and so many guests seemed to have vpl...isn't british underwear supposedly topnotch?
Anonymous wrote:Wow. Cake pr0n:
![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:ahh yes
I see the symbolism in the cake.
Anonymous wrote:
Can you share?