Anonymous wrote:There is really no cure for delusional rich peoples' disorder, other than layoff or some other significant drop in income.
Anonymous wrote:Again, upper-middle class incomes can buy an expanded range of life choices that still fall short of extravagance.
Wealthy incomes can buy solid gold toilet seats for private jets-- or at least occasionally charter private jets with gold plated toilet seats. There are lots of people in America who can do this.
Anonymous wrote:Again, upper-middle class incomes can buy an expanded range of life choices that still fall short of extravagance.
Wealthy incomes can buy solid gold toilet seats for private jets-- or at least occasionally charter private jets with gold plated toilet seats. There are lots of people in America who can do this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Exactly. People are subtracting their home that they own in the city (cause you know, they don't like commuting), their well-paid nanny and private schools and then saying well I'm not rich because I don't have a ton of disposable income. When most people, even well paid professionals in this area, can't afford a home in the city and a well paid nanny, and STILL DON'T HAVE A TON OF DISPOSABLE INCOME.
Here's how I come up with "Don't feel rich". I live in a house that in the early 1920s was owned by a clerk in the interior department. It's the same house. Maybe with stainless steel appliances, but it's a medium sized house with no closet space in a safe neighborhood. I send my two kids to schools which are "good". Which is probably what the clerk in the interior department was able to do with public school education. But I can't do it with public school. I prioritize time at home (and consequently a bigger mortgage) to commuting. I don't want the stress of it. I'm a single mom and I don't want to stress about getting home to the babysitter in time as I sit on 66 or 270.
I know I'm rich by money standards (250K exactly). But I look at my life, and I don't feel that much better off than the clerk who owned my house 100 years ago. He could walk to work, have a house large enough for the family (but not big), send his kids to a safe, good school, and feel like his kids were cared for when they weren't in school (in his case, by his wife). That's about all I have. It's just that those things are ridiculously expensive these days. Child care is horrendously expensive, but if you work, you need to PAY someone to take care of your children. Private school is incredibly expensive, but if your schools suck, you need to pay for schools. If I spent my money differently (living in the suburbs with a 1 hour commute every morning and evening) I could definitely feel "rich". But I don't want to live that way.
Anonymous wrote:
Exactly. People are subtracting their home that they own in the city (cause you know, they don't like commuting), their well-paid nanny and private schools and then saying well I'm not rich because I don't have a ton of disposable income. When most people, even well paid professionals in this area, can't afford a home in the city and a well paid nanny, and STILL DON'T HAVE A TON OF DISPOSABLE INCOME.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Having thoughts of belonging to the middle class while you afford a nanny, a near million dollar mortgage, and private school is clearly a symptom of delusional rich people's disorder.
Exactly. People are subtracting their home that they own in the city (cause you know, they don't like commuting), their well-paid nanny and private schools and then saying well I'm not rich because I don't have a ton of disposable income. When most people, even well paid professionals in this area, can't afford a home in the city and a well paid nanny, and STILL DON'T HAVE A TON OF DISPOSABLE INCOME.
I'm another 160K HHI, and we are doing just fine, but we can't afford a house in the city and we do daycare (it's high priced, but cheaper than a decently paid nanny). I realize we are doing better than most because we own a home close in that has retained a decent amount of value, we have good health insurance, and we are contributing to retirement, college, and other savings. I know we aren't rich but we are doing damn good. If we were making 250K we'd be doing better, even if we decided to get a nanny and move in the city. We'd still be doing better.
Anonymous wrote:Having thoughts of belonging to the middle class while you afford a nanny, a near million dollar mortgage, and private school is clearly a symptom of delusional rich people's disorder.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Having thoughts of belonging to the middle class while you afford a nanny, a near million dollar mortgage, and private school is clearly a symptom of delusional rich people's disorder.
amen and amen.
The total self absorption and delusion of people on this thread that think they're not wealthy while they manage to pay thousands (in fact more than the average American takes home in a YEAR!) for private school, etc is downright depressing. Is this who I live around in DC?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't get. We make 160K combined. We have a decent house in Vienna, two nice cars, a boat.
We pay for preschool, eat out a few times a week, have a decent wardrobe, some nice things.
I feel pretty "rich." Can't see how I would be complaining at all at the 250K level.
Wow.
If you are maxing out your retirement, are adequately insured with life and long-term disability, and are contributing the max for college expenses, and have a emergency fund of a years salary, then yes, Wow, you guys are doing great.