Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kristof mentions two people with firsthand accounts. One of them Isso Amro, has changed his story. His initial accounts on multiple occasions have no mention of sexual assault. The New York Times was apparently ignorant of this, or just didn't care.
STOP WITH THE LIES.
I have had enough of you dragging that good man’s name in the mud. Just stop it.
The NYT typically has good fact checking and certainly would have perfected it for this piece
It is really disorienting to see the same people who loudly excoriated the NYT for its reporting about the rape and torture of women on 10/7 now praising the NYT lavishly, while their counterparts have switched their positions. Opposite Day.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kristof mentions two people with firsthand accounts. One of them Isso Amro, has changed his story. His initial accounts on multiple occasions have no mention of sexual assault. The New York Times was apparently ignorant of this, or just didn't care.
STOP WITH THE LIES.
I have had enough of you dragging that good man’s name in the mud. Just stop it.
The NYT typically has good fact checking and certainly would have perfected it for this piece
It is really disorienting to see the same people who loudly excoriated the NYT for its reporting about the rape and torture of women on 10/7 now praising the NYT lavishly, while their counterparts have switched their positions. Opposite Day.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kristof mentions two people with firsthand accounts. One of them Isso Amro, has changed his story. His initial accounts on multiple occasions have no mention of sexual assault. The New York Times was apparently ignorant of this, or just didn't care.
STOP WITH THE LIES.
I have had enough of you dragging that good man’s name in the mud. Just stop it.
The NYT typically has good fact checking and certainly would have perfected it for this piece
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kristof mentions two people with firsthand accounts. One of them Isso Amro, has changed his story. His initial accounts on multiple occasions have no mention of sexual assault. The New York Times was apparently ignorant of this, or just didn't care.
STOP WITH THE LIES.
I have had enough of you dragging that good man’s name in the mud. Just stop it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kristof mentions two people with firsthand accounts. One of them Isso Amro, has changed his story. His initial accounts on multiple occasions have no mention of sexual assault. The New York Times was apparently ignorant of this, or just didn't care.
STOP WITH THE LIES.
I have had enough of you dragging that good man’s name in the mud. Just stop it.
Anonymous wrote:Kristof mentions two people with firsthand accounts. One of them Isso Amro, has changed his story. His initial accounts on multiple occasions have no mention of sexual assault. The New York Times was apparently ignorant of this, or just didn't care.
Anonymous wrote:Kristof mentions two people with firsthand accounts. One of them Isso Amro, has changed his story. His initial accounts on multiple occasions have no mention of sexual assault. The New York Times was apparently ignorant of this, or just didn't care.
Anonymous wrote:I find it interesting to see the other thread right next to this one re opening the October 7 discussion on rapes
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The lunatics are trying to claim that dogs can’t rape as if the one holding the leash wouldn’t be the one who’s actually using the dog to penetrate. Suddenly bestiality doesn’t exist at all. It’s amazing how these demons just move the goal posts, meanwhile, Pinochet’s Chile and Nazis did it, so I guess now we can question that the Nazis did it since the very people currently claiming it’s a lie are saying Jews lied about Nazis doing it, right?
All you have to do is watch the translation of Israeli TV. These demons admit everything that they do with smiles on their faces, They’re depraved monsters.
Zionist best argument is canine rape is impossible, despite the many Palestinians who have described it, and that at least three different medical journal articles discuss rectal injuries in humans from anal penetration by dogs. It was also used in Pinochet’s prisons.