Anonymous wrote:Do schools really not have hallway cameras? Obviously not in the bathroom, but a camera outside of the bathroom would put an end to the speculation. I know many schools that have this and I can’t come up with a good reason not to have them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes the timing of the email from the family is curious. They waited an entire year until right before admissions decisions come out to email the entire community. And they emailed during the school day versus waiting until after school when parents could speak with their kids about it before they heard it at school.
False - It's clear from the family's letter that they have tried for many months to engage w/ the HOS and the board and have waited patiently for the school to send a letter to all parents telling. them that an incident occured. The letter says the board refused or refused to even meet with them. So they probably reached their limit and send the email. The school's response seemed canned and ready so I'm guessing they knew that the parents were upset and were going to go public.
I'm sure the press (not just the Augur Bit) will be all over this son - well if we had a local paper that covered our region. I worry that the MAGA media will pick this up - "Antiracist Baby Ketanji school fails victim" - and frankly that might be deserved here
Anonymous wrote:Do schools really not have hallway cameras? Obviously not in the bathroom, but a camera outside of the bathroom would put an end to the speculation. I know many schools that have this and I can’t come up with a good reason not to have them.
Anonymous wrote:I am curious about the mask/voice altering situation. The voice alteration seems particularly interesting - because how would that actually work?
It is very possible that this happened and the kids were not in disguise and the victim knows exactly who it was but is still too frightened to say.
Anonymous wrote:Do schools really not have hallway cameras? Obviously not in the bathroom, but a camera outside of the bathroom would put an end to the speculation. I know many schools that have this and I can’t come up with a good reason not to have them.
Anonymous wrote:What is the evidence burden here for MPD?
Is it: physical evidence - well the victim reported this 6 weeks after the fact to his parents so a rape kit would not work
Is it: camera evidence - my guess is GDS does not have cameras in or near bathrooms so that will not be it
If the victim knows who one or both perps are or has a reasonable guess, i assume that is not evidence -
I sense we are stuck here between "credible" and what the MPD needs.
GDS is of course hiding behind their lawyers. Fact that they did not send the school a notification in 2025 that an incident had occured at school against a child that they were investigating tells me that they DO NOT believe the victim. Shame on this board and russell.
Anonymous wrote:Yes the timing of the email from the family is curious. They waited an entire year until right before admissions decisions come out to email the entire community. And they emailed during the school day versus waiting until after school when parents could speak with their kids about it before they heard it at school.
Anonymous wrote:The goal of the family was clearly to wreck havoc on the school especially given the timing. It was completely inappropriate to send that email directly to current students sharing that level of detail in the middle of their school day. Parents should be able to navigate those conversations with their children. Asking Middle Schoolers if they remember anything unusual about a day from November of 2024 through a blast email unlikely to yield meaningful information.