Anonymous wrote:For those with legitimate RA’s, it’s annoying as well. Should not be kept interim for months on end. It should not take that long to process. It’s 45 days under the SEC procedures and for many it’s been six or more months. All of these require medical documentation so those who think people are just working from home for no reason, think again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is it strange that all the RAs are being kept interim after a long time. Anyone have theirs go final or cancelled? Trying to figure out what their game plan is?
It annoys me- I think many of them are just trying work from home. It is not fair to the people who come in every day. OHR needs to process them more timely or require people to use leave or come in.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is it strange that all the RAs are being kept interim after a long time. Anyone have theirs go final or cancelled? Trying to figure out what their game plan is?
It annoys me- I think many of them are just trying work from home. It is not fair to the people who come in every day. OHR needs to process them more timely or require people to use leave or come in.
Anonymous wrote:Is it strange that all the RAs are being kept interim after a long time. Anyone have theirs go final or cancelled? Trying to figure out what their game plan is?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is it strange that all the RAs are being kept interim after a long time. Anyone have theirs go final or cancelled? Trying to figure out what their game plan is?
I don’t know, but it may be because they have been giving them out like candy at Halloween and they may want to have a bit greater flexibility to analyze whether they are really appropriate.
The reason is because FOH has to review them and FOH is backlogged beyond belief from all of the agencies that need assistance analyzing RAs. The SEC has to get in line along with everyone else.
Agencies have to run reasonable accommodation requests past people outside the agency? Is that a new requirement to centralize things?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is it strange that all the RAs are being kept interim after a long time. Anyone have theirs go final or cancelled? Trying to figure out what their game plan is?
I don’t know, but it may be because they have been giving them out like candy at Halloween and they may want to have a bit greater flexibility to analyze whether they are really appropriate.
The reason is because FOH has to review them and FOH is backlogged beyond belief from all of the agencies that need assistance analyzing RAs. The SEC has to get in line along with everyone else.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is it strange that all the RAs are being kept interim after a long time. Anyone have theirs go final or cancelled? Trying to figure out what their game plan is?
I don’t know, but it may be because they have been giving them out like candy at Halloween and they may want to have a bit greater flexibility to analyze whether they are really appropriate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I doubt there will be any settlement. Maybe with the Division directors asking for a day we get one day. But that is even highly doubtful.
Our division director asked him about returning to the old tradition of jeans on Fridays and he was berated for even asking. How dare the peasants request such things!
I don’t believe this. Based on what I’ve seen, it’s hard to imagine PA berating anyone. He is pretty steady Freddy.
A tongue lashing was the expression that was used to describe it. I suppose that is milder than berating.
I don’t even believe that version.
Anonymous wrote:Is it strange that all the RAs are being kept interim after a long time. Anyone have theirs go final or cancelled? Trying to figure out what their game plan is?
Anonymous wrote:I was gonna say why does it matter if he says yes or not to jeans on Friday - I'd venture to guess 50% of people wear them anyway.
Any truth to the fact that the division directors are asking for 1 day of TW? Bc I heard the Enf director asked - on her own not as part of this request - and was told no. So I don't see what the point is unless they think all the divisions asking jointly is better leverage or whatever.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I hear it is happening. And soon. And any thoughts about seating and lease terms and wondering how it will work and how can they do this with no telework are irrelevant. The agency doesn’t have control anymore. And even if they did this Chairman has no clue or doesn’t even ponder how this or anything else would impact staff.
While we had all thought things may have finally stabilized, this will throw DC into chaos and worry. No one realizes that nothing will get done while all the moving and shuffling is going on. Cleaning out offices. Moving your own stuff.
If any of this is true, losing SP2 maybe be a good thing long term, even if there is some short term pain.
Once there is an administration that is not so hostile telework (possible even under a non-Trump Republican administration) it will be easier to demonstrate the need with the lower footprint.
Everyone keep saying in three years . . . In three years. But it could be seven. And even if a more reasonable or humane person is chairman, this isn’t something they will change day 1.